Dispossessing Resident Voice: Municipal Receiverships and the Public Trust

Juliet M. Moringiello
{"title":"Dispossessing Resident Voice: Municipal Receiverships and the Public Trust","authors":"Juliet M. Moringiello","doi":"10.36646/mjlr.53.4.dispossessing.moringiello","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The residents of struggling cities suffer property dispossessions both as individual owners and as municipal residents. Their individual dispossessions are part of a cycle that often begins with industrial decline. In Detroit, for example, more than 100,000 residents have lost their homes to tax foreclosure over a four-year period that bracketed the city’s bankruptcy filing. Falling property values, job losses, and foreclosures affect municipal budgets by reducing tax revenues. As individual dispossessions exacerbate municipal financial crises, residents can also face the loss of municipal property. Struggling cities and towns often sell publicly owned property—from parks to parking systems—to balance municipal budgets. This article discusses the relationship between property dispossessions and proceedings to resolve municipal financial distress, with a focus on another important loss faced by residents of distressed municipalities—the loss of their voice in municipal government. A municipal financial crisis, by itself, has no effect on the property of any individuals who live in the city, and a city’s bankruptcy does not take a city’s assets in the same way that a corporate or personal bankruptcy can take the property of a business or individual. Yet even though creditors cannot force the sale of city-owned assets, the decision to transfer the property may be made by unelected officials appointed by the state government to replace city government in times of financial crisis. This results in another type of collective dispossession—the dispossession of resident voice in local government affairs. This article discusses how insolvency proceedings, including Chapter 9 bankruptcy, can deprive residents of their voice and, in turn, deprive them of the city’s assets that the city holds for them in public trust and proposes some suggestions for states for balancing the need for resident voice with higher-level financial oversight as they determine how to manage the financial distress of their cities. * Associate Dean for Research and Faculty Development, Widener University Commonwealth Law School. Many thanks to the editors and staff of the Michigan Journal of Law Reform for hosting the thought-provoking symposium, Dispossessing Detroit, for which this Ar-","PeriodicalId":83420,"journal":{"name":"University of Michigan journal of law reform. University of Michigan. Law School","volume":"14 1","pages":"733-754"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Michigan journal of law reform. University of Michigan. Law School","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36646/mjlr.53.4.dispossessing.moringiello","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The residents of struggling cities suffer property dispossessions both as individual owners and as municipal residents. Their individual dispossessions are part of a cycle that often begins with industrial decline. In Detroit, for example, more than 100,000 residents have lost their homes to tax foreclosure over a four-year period that bracketed the city’s bankruptcy filing. Falling property values, job losses, and foreclosures affect municipal budgets by reducing tax revenues. As individual dispossessions exacerbate municipal financial crises, residents can also face the loss of municipal property. Struggling cities and towns often sell publicly owned property—from parks to parking systems—to balance municipal budgets. This article discusses the relationship between property dispossessions and proceedings to resolve municipal financial distress, with a focus on another important loss faced by residents of distressed municipalities—the loss of their voice in municipal government. A municipal financial crisis, by itself, has no effect on the property of any individuals who live in the city, and a city’s bankruptcy does not take a city’s assets in the same way that a corporate or personal bankruptcy can take the property of a business or individual. Yet even though creditors cannot force the sale of city-owned assets, the decision to transfer the property may be made by unelected officials appointed by the state government to replace city government in times of financial crisis. This results in another type of collective dispossession—the dispossession of resident voice in local government affairs. This article discusses how insolvency proceedings, including Chapter 9 bankruptcy, can deprive residents of their voice and, in turn, deprive them of the city’s assets that the city holds for them in public trust and proposes some suggestions for states for balancing the need for resident voice with higher-level financial oversight as they determine how to manage the financial distress of their cities. * Associate Dean for Research and Faculty Development, Widener University Commonwealth Law School. Many thanks to the editors and staff of the Michigan Journal of Law Reform for hosting the thought-provoking symposium, Dispossessing Detroit, for which this Ar-
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
剥夺居民的声音:市政破产管理和公共信托
挣扎城市的居民无论是作为个人业主还是作为市政居民,都遭受着财产被剥夺的痛苦。他们个人的财产被剥夺是一个周期的一部分,这个周期往往始于工业衰退。以底特律为例,在该市申请破产之前的四年时间里,超过10万居民因税收丧失抵押品赎回权而失去了住房。房地产价值下跌、失业和丧失抵押品赎回权通过减少税收收入影响市政预算。由于个人财产的剥夺加剧了市政财政危机,居民也可能面临市政财产的损失。挣扎中的城镇通常会出售公共财产——从公园到停车系统——以平衡市政预算。本文讨论了财产剥夺与解决市政财政困境的诉讼程序之间的关系,重点讨论了陷入困境的市政居民面临的另一个重要损失——在市政府中失去发言权。市政金融危机本身不会对居住在该市的任何个人的财产产生影响,一个城市的破产不会像公司或个人破产那样夺走一个城市的资产。但是,即使债权团不能强制出售城市所有资产,但在财政危机时,由州政府任命代替市政府的非民选官员来决定财产转移。这导致了另一种形式的集体剥夺——剥夺居民在地方政府事务中的发言权。本文讨论了包括第9章破产在内的破产程序如何剥夺了居民的发言权,进而剥夺了城市在公众信任下为他们保管的城市资产,并为各州在决定如何管理其城市的财务困境时平衡居民发言权的需求与更高级别的财务监督提出了一些建议。*怀德纳大学联邦法学院研究与师资发展副院长。非常感谢《密歇根法律改革杂志》的编辑和工作人员主办了这场发人深省的研讨会,“剥夺底特律”,为此,我要向大家致谢
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A System Out of Balance: A Critical Analysis of Philosophical Justifications for Copyright Law Through the Lenz of Users' Rights Giving the Fourth Amendment Meaning: Creating an Adversarial Warrant Proceeding to Protect From Unreasonable Searches and Seizures Private Caregiver Presumption For Elder Caregivers The Short Unhappy Life of the Negotiation Class Former Whistleblowers: Why the False Claims Act's Anti-Retaliation Provision Should Protect Former Employees
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1