Implant Survival in Tissue-Engineered Mandibular Reconstruction-Early Experiences.

IF 0.8 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction Pub Date : 2023-09-01 Epub Date: 2022-07-21 DOI:10.1177/19433875221116962
Victoria A Mañón, Nicholas Oda, Emeric Boudreaux, Huy Tran, Simon Young, James C Melville
{"title":"Implant Survival in Tissue-Engineered Mandibular Reconstruction-Early Experiences.","authors":"Victoria A Mañón, Nicholas Oda, Emeric Boudreaux, Huy Tran, Simon Young, James C Melville","doi":"10.1177/19433875221116962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>This article is to evaluate the early outcomes of dental implants placed in bone generated with tissueengineering techniques, specifically recombinant human bone morphogenic protein-2 (rhBMP-2), allogeneicbone particulate, and bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) in patients with resection of benignpathology.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the long-term prognosis of dental implants placed in tissue engineered mandibular reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively evaluated 12 patient records, all of whom underwent segmental mandibular resection of benign pathology and reconstruction with a combination of BMAC, rhBMP-2, and allogeneic bone. Collecteddata points included the patient's age, gender, medical and social histories, implant site and placement date, resection/reconstruction date, final prosthesis, pathology resected, and follow-up dates (average 25 monthsof follow-up). Implant success was defined as clinical osseointegration (immobility), absence of peri-implantradiolucency, and absence of infection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve patients met inclusion criteria with a total of 46 implants. The overall implant survival rate was 91.3%. There were 4 implant failures occurring in two patients: 1 failure in Patient 3 and 3 failures in Patient 8. Neitherpatient had any existing medical comorbidities or social history known to increase the risk for implant failure. The average implant placement occurred 11.6 months after mandibular reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preliminary findings of implant placement in bone generated with tissue engineering techniques have shown to be another predictable alternative for orofacial rehabilitation. Practical Implications: Dental rehabilitationusing dental implants is a predictable treatment option for patients that have required reconstruction of largebony defects status post resection of benign pathology using novel tissue engineering techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":46447,"journal":{"name":"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10638974/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19433875221116962","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: This article is to evaluate the early outcomes of dental implants placed in bone generated with tissueengineering techniques, specifically recombinant human bone morphogenic protein-2 (rhBMP-2), allogeneicbone particulate, and bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) in patients with resection of benignpathology.

Objective: To evaluate the long-term prognosis of dental implants placed in tissue engineered mandibular reconstruction.

Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 12 patient records, all of whom underwent segmental mandibular resection of benign pathology and reconstruction with a combination of BMAC, rhBMP-2, and allogeneic bone. Collecteddata points included the patient's age, gender, medical and social histories, implant site and placement date, resection/reconstruction date, final prosthesis, pathology resected, and follow-up dates (average 25 monthsof follow-up). Implant success was defined as clinical osseointegration (immobility), absence of peri-implantradiolucency, and absence of infection.

Results: Twelve patients met inclusion criteria with a total of 46 implants. The overall implant survival rate was 91.3%. There were 4 implant failures occurring in two patients: 1 failure in Patient 3 and 3 failures in Patient 8. Neitherpatient had any existing medical comorbidities or social history known to increase the risk for implant failure. The average implant placement occurred 11.6 months after mandibular reconstruction.

Conclusions: Preliminary findings of implant placement in bone generated with tissue engineering techniques have shown to be another predictable alternative for orofacial rehabilitation. Practical Implications: Dental rehabilitationusing dental implants is a predictable treatment option for patients that have required reconstruction of largebony defects status post resection of benign pathology using novel tissue engineering techniques.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
组织工程下颌骨重建中种植体存活的早期经验。
研究设计:本文旨在评估用组织工程技术,特别是重组人骨形态发生蛋白-2 (rhBMP-2)、异基因骨颗粒和骨髓抽液浓缩液(BMAC)植入良性病变切除患者骨中的早期结果。目的:探讨种植体在组织工程下颌骨重建术中的远期预后。方法:我们回顾性评估了12例患者的记录,所有患者都接受了良性病理的下颌骨节段性切除和BMAC、rhBMP-2和异体骨联合重建。收集的数据点包括患者的年龄、性别、病史和社会史、种植体位置和放置日期、切除/重建日期、最终假体、病理切除和随访日期(平均随访25个月)。种植体成功被定义为临床骨整合(固定),种植体周围无撕裂,无感染。结果:12例患者符合纳入标准,共种植体46颗。种植体整体存活率为91.3%。2例患者发生4次植入失败:患者3 1次失败,患者8 3次失败。两例患者均无已知增加植入失败风险的合并症或社会史。种植体平均在下颌骨重建后11.6个月植入。结论:在组织工程技术生成的骨中植入种植体的初步研究结果表明,这是口腔面部康复的另一种可预测的选择。实际意义:对于良性病理切除后需要重建大骨缺损的患者,使用种植体进行牙科康复是一种可预测的治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction
Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
期刊最新文献
Anatomical Landmarks and Branching Patterns of the Greater Auricular Nerve. Revision Surgery With Refixation After Mandibular Fractures. A Single Center Experience: A Retrospective Study Over 10-Years Period on Mandible Fractures. Comparing Current Practice Habits for Treatment of Subcondylar Fracture Among Craniomaxillofacial Surgeons. Patterns of Midface and Mandible Fractures in a Government Hospital.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1