A comprehensive view to reflection on the palliative care approach for family medicine residents: A modified Delphi method

J. Hamano, Junji Haruta, Naoto Ishimaru, Takahiro Otsuka, Naoko Den, Keiichiro Sakato, Takuma Kimura, Ryo Yamamoto
{"title":"A comprehensive view to reflection on the palliative care approach for family medicine residents: A modified Delphi method","authors":"J. Hamano, Junji Haruta, Naoto Ishimaru, Takahiro Otsuka, Naoko Den, Keiichiro Sakato, Takuma Kimura, Ryo Yamamoto","doi":"10.1080/2331205X.2019.1704137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Effective reflection is essential to allow family medicine residents to cope with difficult and negative experiences during palliative care. We developed a multidisciplinary, consensus-based comprehensive view to reflection on the palliative care approach for family medicine residents. We used a modified Delphi method and a multidisciplinary panel to build a systematic consensus. We developed a prototype comprehensive view based on a literature review, cognitive flexibility theory, and discussion by the research team. The 12 panelists consisted of 8 physicians, 3 nurses, and 1 medical social worker. The final comprehensive view consisted of 11 situations and 6 viewpoints regarding patterns of rapid and intermittent functional decline, respectively, with a total of 508 statements. Six of the 11 situations were common to both illness trajectories, and there were 5 unique situations for each disease trajectory. The 6 viewpoints were physical evaluation, mental/psychological evaluation, social evaluation, spiritual evaluation, cooperation among multidisciplinary professionals, and professional judgment. A comprehensive view to reflection on the palliative care approach was developed for family medicine residents using a modified Delphi method with multidisciplinary input. This comprehensive view may help family medicine residents and faculty become more reflective practitioners through interactive communication.","PeriodicalId":10470,"journal":{"name":"Cogent Medicine","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cogent Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2331205X.2019.1704137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Effective reflection is essential to allow family medicine residents to cope with difficult and negative experiences during palliative care. We developed a multidisciplinary, consensus-based comprehensive view to reflection on the palliative care approach for family medicine residents. We used a modified Delphi method and a multidisciplinary panel to build a systematic consensus. We developed a prototype comprehensive view based on a literature review, cognitive flexibility theory, and discussion by the research team. The 12 panelists consisted of 8 physicians, 3 nurses, and 1 medical social worker. The final comprehensive view consisted of 11 situations and 6 viewpoints regarding patterns of rapid and intermittent functional decline, respectively, with a total of 508 statements. Six of the 11 situations were common to both illness trajectories, and there were 5 unique situations for each disease trajectory. The 6 viewpoints were physical evaluation, mental/psychological evaluation, social evaluation, spiritual evaluation, cooperation among multidisciplinary professionals, and professional judgment. A comprehensive view to reflection on the palliative care approach was developed for family medicine residents using a modified Delphi method with multidisciplinary input. This comprehensive view may help family medicine residents and faculty become more reflective practitioners through interactive communication.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
家庭医学住院医师缓和疗护方式之综合思考:修正德尔菲法
有效的反思是必不可少的,让家庭医学居民应对困难和消极的经验,在姑息治疗。我们开发了一个多学科,基于共识的综合观点,以反映姑息治疗方法的家庭医学居民。我们使用改进的德尔菲法和多学科小组来建立系统的共识。我们在文献综述、认知灵活性理论和研究小组讨论的基础上,形成了一个原型综合观点。12名小组成员包括8名医生、3名护士和1名医务社工。最后的综合观点包括11种情况和6种观点,分别是关于快速和间歇性功能衰退的模式,共有508个陈述。11种情况中有6种是两种疾病轨迹共有的,每种疾病轨迹有5种独特的情况。这6个观点分别是身体评价、精神/心理评价、社会评价、精神评价、多学科专业合作和职业判断。采用多学科输入的改进德尔菲法,对家庭医学住院医师的姑息治疗方法进行了全面的反思。这种综合的观点可以帮助家庭医学住院医生和教师通过互动交流成为更多的反思从业者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Factors associated with uptake of community client-led ART delivery model at Mulago adult HIV clinic _ Mulago National Referral Hospital Malaria interventions and control programes in Sub-Saharan Africa: A narrative review Quantitative assessment of specific serum IgGs may verify source of environmental exposure in extrinsic allergic alveolitis (EAA) Divergence in fertility levels and patterns of muslim-majority countries of maghreb and middle/West Africa Exploration of how to make the collaborative planning process work - a grounded theory study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1