Competitive Jurisdictions of Local Administration Authorities and Notaries for the Certification Purposes in Montenegro

IF 0.5 4区 管理学 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE Lex Localis-Journal of Local Self-Government Pub Date : 2021-07-22 DOI:10.4335/19.3.439-459(2021)
Velibor Korać
{"title":"Competitive Jurisdictions of Local Administration Authorities and Notaries for the Certification Purposes in Montenegro","authors":"Velibor Korać","doi":"10.4335/19.3.439-459(2021)","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the adoption of the new Law on Certification of Signatures, Manuscripts and Transcripts the Montenegrin legislator did not take into account the fact of introducing the notary services into the legal system of Montenegro. Unlike most of the comparative legislations, certification of signatures, transcripts and manuscripts have not been transferred to the exclusive competence of notaries, but a competitive competence of notaries, local administration authorities and the courts in carrying out these assignments has been retained. Further retention of competitive jurisdiction in this matter is not justified any more. The analysis of this decision has shown that it leads to an unequal position, depending on the authority before which the certification is performed, whereas the obligations and professional competences of officials and notaries are different. Notarial certifications contribute to greater legal certainty and besides are more available to the citizens and not more expensive. Parallel jurisdiction is not a standard of notarial services in European continental law which has adopted the Latin model of notary as a independent profession having public authorities. This solution does not lead to building a legal certainty, protection of public interest and relieving the work of courts and administrative authorities, which has been the underlying legal political reason for introducing notariat.","PeriodicalId":51875,"journal":{"name":"Lex Localis-Journal of Local Self-Government","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lex Localis-Journal of Local Self-Government","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4335/19.3.439-459(2021)","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the adoption of the new Law on Certification of Signatures, Manuscripts and Transcripts the Montenegrin legislator did not take into account the fact of introducing the notary services into the legal system of Montenegro. Unlike most of the comparative legislations, certification of signatures, transcripts and manuscripts have not been transferred to the exclusive competence of notaries, but a competitive competence of notaries, local administration authorities and the courts in carrying out these assignments has been retained. Further retention of competitive jurisdiction in this matter is not justified any more. The analysis of this decision has shown that it leads to an unequal position, depending on the authority before which the certification is performed, whereas the obligations and professional competences of officials and notaries are different. Notarial certifications contribute to greater legal certainty and besides are more available to the citizens and not more expensive. Parallel jurisdiction is not a standard of notarial services in European continental law which has adopted the Latin model of notary as a independent profession having public authorities. This solution does not lead to building a legal certainty, protection of public interest and relieving the work of courts and administrative authorities, which has been the underlying legal political reason for introducing notariat.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
黑山地方行政当局和公证人的竞争性司法管辖区
在通过新的《签名、手稿和抄本核证法》时,黑山立法者没有考虑到将公证服务纳入黑山法律制度的事实。与大多数比较性立法不同的是,签名、抄本和手稿的核证并没有转交给公证人的专属权限,但公证人、地方行政当局和法院在执行这些任务方面的竞争性权限仍得到保留。在这个问题上进一步保留竞争性管辖权是不合理的。对这一决定的分析表明,它导致了一种不平等的地位,这取决于进行核证的当局,而官员和公证人的义务和专业能力是不同的。公证证书有助于提高法律确定性,此外,公民更容易获得公证证书,而且价格也不贵。平行管辖并不是欧洲大陆法系公证服务的标准,欧洲大陆法系采用了拉丁公证模式,公证是一种具有公共权力的独立职业。这种解决办法不会导致建立法律确定性,保护公共利益和减轻法院和行政当局的工作,这是引入公证的基本法律政治原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
25.00%
发文量
31
期刊最新文献
(Correct) Calculation of Payment During Annual Leave and Allowance in Lieu of Leave not Taken in the Public and Private Sectors and the Impact of the Case-law of the Court of Justice on the Decision-making of the Slovenian Courts The Importance of the Application of Controlling in the Management of Public Enterprises whose Founders are Local Self-government Units: The Example of Republic of Serbia The Development of Innovation Knowledge Management System in Tangerang Regency Local Government Vertical Upward Accountability, Oversight, and the Intervention Mechanism in South Africa Position of the Local Development Fee in the System of Local Taxes and Fees in the Slovak Republic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1