Pulverized river shellfish shells as a 904 cheap adsorbent for removing of malathion from water: Examination of the isotherms, kinetics, thermodynamics and optimization of the experimental conditions by the response surface method

Z. Veličković, Bogdan Vujičić, Vladica S. Stojanović, Predrag Stojisavljević, Z. Bajić, V. Đokić, Negovan Ivanković, P. Otrísal
{"title":"Pulverized river shellfish shells as a 904 cheap adsorbent for removing of malathion from water: Examination of the isotherms, kinetics, thermodynamics and optimization of the experimental conditions by the response surface method","authors":"Z. Veličković, Bogdan Vujičić, Vladica S. Stojanović, Predrag Stojisavljević, Z. Bajić, V. Đokić, Negovan Ivanković, P. Otrísal","doi":"10.5937/vojtehg69-32844","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction/purpose: In this study, we investigated the possibility of removing the organophosphorus pesticide malathion from water using a new adsorbent based on the biowaste of river shell shards from the Anodonta Sinadonta woodiane family, a material that accumulates in large quantities as waste on the banks of large rivers. Two adsorbents were tested - mechanically comminuted river shells (MRM) and mechanosynthetic hydroxyapatite from comminuted river shells (RMHAp). Methods: The obtained adsorbents were characterized and tested for the removal of the organophosphorus pesticide malathion from water. In order to predict the optimal adsorption conditions using the Response Surface Method (RSM), the authors investigated the influence of variable factors (adsorption conditions), pH values, adsorbent doses, contact times, and temperatures on the adsorbent capacity. Results: The best adsorption of malathion was achieved at mean pH values between 6.0 and 7.0. The adsorption data for malathion at 25, 35, and 45 °C were compared using the Langmuir, Freundlich, DubininRadushkevich (DR), and Temkin isothermal models, as well as pseudofirst order, pseudo-second order and Elovic kinetic models for modeling adsorption kinetics. The maximum Langmuir adsorption capacity for MRM and RMHAp at 25 °C was 46,462 mg g-1 and 78,311 mg g-1 , respectively. Conclusion: The results have showed that malathion adsorption on both adsorbents follows the pseudo-second kinetic model and the Freundlich isothermal model. The thermodynamic parameters indicate the endothermic, feasible, and spontaneous nature of the adsorption process.","PeriodicalId":30576,"journal":{"name":"Vojnotehnicki Glasnik","volume":"102 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vojnotehnicki Glasnik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/vojtehg69-32844","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction/purpose: In this study, we investigated the possibility of removing the organophosphorus pesticide malathion from water using a new adsorbent based on the biowaste of river shell shards from the Anodonta Sinadonta woodiane family, a material that accumulates in large quantities as waste on the banks of large rivers. Two adsorbents were tested - mechanically comminuted river shells (MRM) and mechanosynthetic hydroxyapatite from comminuted river shells (RMHAp). Methods: The obtained adsorbents were characterized and tested for the removal of the organophosphorus pesticide malathion from water. In order to predict the optimal adsorption conditions using the Response Surface Method (RSM), the authors investigated the influence of variable factors (adsorption conditions), pH values, adsorbent doses, contact times, and temperatures on the adsorbent capacity. Results: The best adsorption of malathion was achieved at mean pH values between 6.0 and 7.0. The adsorption data for malathion at 25, 35, and 45 °C were compared using the Langmuir, Freundlich, DubininRadushkevich (DR), and Temkin isothermal models, as well as pseudofirst order, pseudo-second order and Elovic kinetic models for modeling adsorption kinetics. The maximum Langmuir adsorption capacity for MRM and RMHAp at 25 °C was 46,462 mg g-1 and 78,311 mg g-1 , respectively. Conclusion: The results have showed that malathion adsorption on both adsorbents follows the pseudo-second kinetic model and the Freundlich isothermal model. The thermodynamic parameters indicate the endothermic, feasible, and spontaneous nature of the adsorption process.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
河贝粉作为水中马拉硫磷的904廉价吸附剂:响应面法的等温线、动力学、热力学考察及实验条件优化
简介/目的:本研究研究了一种新型吸附剂去除水中有机磷农药马拉硫磷的可能性,该吸附剂是基于Anodonta Sinadonta woodiane家族的河贝壳碎片生物废弃物,这是一种大量积累在大河岸边的废物。试验了两种吸附剂——机械粉碎河壳(MRM)和机械合成河壳羟基磷灰石(RMHAp)。方法:对制备的吸附剂进行表征,并对其对水中有机磷农药马拉硫磷的去除效果进行了测试。为了利用响应面法(RSM)预测最佳吸附条件,研究了吸附条件、pH值、吸附剂剂量、接触时间和温度对吸附剂容量的影响。结果:平均pH值为6.0 ~ 7.0时,对马拉硫磷的吸附效果最佳。采用Langmuir、Freundlich、DubininRadushkevich (DR)和Temkin等温模型以及拟一级、拟二级和Elovic动力学模型对马拉硫磷在25、35和45℃下的吸附数据进行了比较。25℃条件下,MRM和RMHAp的最大Langmuir吸附量分别为46,462 mg g-1和78,311 mg g-1。结论:两种吸附剂对马拉硫磷的吸附均符合拟秒动力学模型和Freundlich等温模型。热力学参数表明吸附过程是吸热的、可行的和自发的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Data security in mobile healthcare On the spectral radius of VDB graph matrices Numerical methods and their application in dynamics of structures Application of the modeling method to the calculation of the probability of hitting a stationary target during the fire action of a tank squad in defense Supersymmetry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1