Mouth of the Donkey: Re-imagining Biblical Animals by Laura Duhan-Kaplan (review)

Edward C. Sellner
{"title":"Mouth of the Donkey: Re-imagining Biblical Animals by Laura Duhan-Kaplan (review)","authors":"Edward C. Sellner","doi":"10.5406/21601267.13.1.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The result stresses a more creation-friendly and creature-friendly understanding of the Godhead (p. 151). While holding to a traditional/orthodox understanding of the Trinity, this presentation of the Father as Gentleness, the Son as Solidarity, and the Holy Spirit as Fraternity “highlight[s] the different ways in which we experience God’s love” (p. 151). Further, inspired by Boff and the biblical witness, it helps us “glimpse something of the divine in relation to all creation” (p. 153; see further pp. 151–153, 159, 167). Second, her efforts to distinguish the connected but disparate concerns and priorities of ecological and animal theology—a discussion emerging largely from her critique of Boff’s Ecology and Liberation: A New Paradigm (1993; English translation 1995)—is welcome. As she explains in various places, the former’s attention to sustaining holistic systems as opposed to consideration of individual animals within them is more consequential in its implications than many realize (p. 34; cf. pp. 10, 174). She devotes a full chapter (pp. 85–117) to questions stemming from these different disciplines. Third, her attention to region-specific concerns in her theological work on Boff and animals is an instructive model (see, e.g., the series of interviews in the appendices, pp. 170–194). Boff is a contextual theologian (pp. 35, 77, 99–100, etc.), and Linzey introduces readers to the Brazilian setting that informs his writing (pp. 35–38). This illustration of contextually sensitive animal thought is helpful, serving to remind readers that regional/national cultural, political, and social issues shape animal welfare efforts. This thoroughly researched and innovative study is a valuable contribution to the field and is sure to (or at least ought to) prompt further attention to the place of animals in Catholic and liberation theological discourses in the years to come. Highly recommended. Mouth of the Donkey: Re-imagining Biblical Animals. By Laura Duhan-Kaplan. (Eugene, OR: Cascade Books, 2021. 84 + ix pp. Paperback. $15.00. ISBN: 978-1-7252-5905-8.)","PeriodicalId":73601,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied animal ethics research","volume":"25 1","pages":"103 - 105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied animal ethics research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5406/21601267.13.1.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The result stresses a more creation-friendly and creature-friendly understanding of the Godhead (p. 151). While holding to a traditional/orthodox understanding of the Trinity, this presentation of the Father as Gentleness, the Son as Solidarity, and the Holy Spirit as Fraternity “highlight[s] the different ways in which we experience God’s love” (p. 151). Further, inspired by Boff and the biblical witness, it helps us “glimpse something of the divine in relation to all creation” (p. 153; see further pp. 151–153, 159, 167). Second, her efforts to distinguish the connected but disparate concerns and priorities of ecological and animal theology—a discussion emerging largely from her critique of Boff’s Ecology and Liberation: A New Paradigm (1993; English translation 1995)—is welcome. As she explains in various places, the former’s attention to sustaining holistic systems as opposed to consideration of individual animals within them is more consequential in its implications than many realize (p. 34; cf. pp. 10, 174). She devotes a full chapter (pp. 85–117) to questions stemming from these different disciplines. Third, her attention to region-specific concerns in her theological work on Boff and animals is an instructive model (see, e.g., the series of interviews in the appendices, pp. 170–194). Boff is a contextual theologian (pp. 35, 77, 99–100, etc.), and Linzey introduces readers to the Brazilian setting that informs his writing (pp. 35–38). This illustration of contextually sensitive animal thought is helpful, serving to remind readers that regional/national cultural, political, and social issues shape animal welfare efforts. This thoroughly researched and innovative study is a valuable contribution to the field and is sure to (or at least ought to) prompt further attention to the place of animals in Catholic and liberation theological discourses in the years to come. Highly recommended. Mouth of the Donkey: Re-imagining Biblical Animals. By Laura Duhan-Kaplan. (Eugene, OR: Cascade Books, 2021. 84 + ix pp. Paperback. $15.00. ISBN: 978-1-7252-5905-8.)
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《驴嘴:重新想象圣经中的动物》劳拉·杜汉-卡普兰著(书评)
结果强调对神性有一种更有利于创造和受造物的理解(第151页)。在坚持对三位一体的传统/正统理解的同时,圣父是温柔的,圣子是团结的,圣神是博爱的这种表述“突出了我们体验上帝之爱的不同方式”(第151页)。此外,受伯夫和圣经见证的启发,它帮助我们“瞥见与所有创造有关的神圣”(第153页;进一步见第151-153、159、167页)。其次,她努力区分生态神学和动物神学之间相互联系但又截然不同的关注和优先事项——这一讨论主要来自她对Boff的《生态与解放:新范式》(1993;英文翻译1995)-是受欢迎的。正如她在许多地方解释的那样,前者关注维持整体系统,而不是考虑其中的个体动物,其含义比许多人意识到的更重要(第34页;参见第10、174页)。她用了整整一章(第85-117页)来讨论来自这些不同学科的问题。第三,在她关于Boff和动物的神学著作中,她对特定地区的关注是一个有指导意义的模式(例如,参见附录中的一系列访谈,第170-194页)。Boff是一位背景神学家(第35页,第77页,第99-100页等),Linzey向读者介绍了他写作的巴西背景(第35 - 38页)。这个对环境敏感的动物思想的例证很有帮助,它有助于提醒读者,地区/国家的文化、政治和社会问题影响了动物福利的努力。这项深入研究和创新的研究是对该领域的宝贵贡献,并且肯定(或至少应该)在未来的几年里促使人们进一步关注动物在天主教和解放神学话语中的地位。强烈推荐。驴嘴:重新想象圣经中的动物。劳拉·杜汉-卡普兰著。俄勒冈州尤金:Cascade Books, 2021年出版。84 + ix页,平装本。15.00美元。ISBN: 978-1-7252-5905-8)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Phenomenology and Critical Hermeneutics of the “Livestock” Industry and Associated Sanctuaries Neglected Tropical Diseases and Long-Term Captive Animals: Ethical Considerations with Venom Lab Snakes Quality Management and Animal Welfare as Culture of Care for Animal Experiments under Biosafety Level-3, taking COVID-19 as a Practical Example Rejecting an Additive Solution to Regan’s Lifeboat Case Zoonoses in Unconventional Companion Animals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1