Dietitians’ and nutritionists’ knowledge of nutritional genomics and perception toward genetic testing for a personalized approach in noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) prevention and management in India: A cross-sectional survey

M. Mathew, Srujana Medithi, Arti Muley
{"title":"Dietitians’ and nutritionists’ knowledge of nutritional genomics and perception toward genetic testing for a personalized approach in noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) prevention and management in India: A cross-sectional survey","authors":"M. Mathew, Srujana Medithi, Arti Muley","doi":"10.4103/ijnpnd.ijnpnd_70_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Dietitians and nutritionists have been identified as healthcare professionals who are well positioned to interpret and communicate aspects of nutritional genomics into practical and effective dietary recommendations. Therefore, the present study aimed to assess dietitians’ and nutritionists’ knowledge of essential concepts in nutritional genomics; and perceptions toward genetic testing. Methods: Prospective cross-sectional study was conducted among dietitians and nutritionists using an online questionnaire. The data were analyzed using descriptive and analytical statistics. Results: About 142 dietitians and nutritionists were included in the study. The majority of the respondents were female (88%). Around 61.3% had work experience ranging between 1 and 5 years. The knowledge score on nutritional genomics indicated 9% (n = 13) of them scored high, 42% (n = 59) scored medium, and 49% (n = 70) scored low scores. The average knowledge score was 42.3%, indicating a low level of knowledge of genetics and nutritional genomics. The mean perception was 3.85 on a scale from 1 (extremely negative) to 5 (extremely positive), which may be an overall positive perception of applying nutritional genomics into practical and effective dietary recommendations. The findings revealed a statistically significant link between knowledge and perception level, on-job training, and continuing education in nutritional genomics. Perception scores were shown to be positively associated with higher knowledge levels. Conclusions: Dietitians and nutritionists have low knowledge but a high perception level of nutritional genomic. Most of them were informed about nutrigenomics and had a favorable opinion, regardless of whether they had previously studied nutrigenomics as a college-level subject.","PeriodicalId":14233,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nutrition, Pharmacology, Neurological Diseases","volume":"20 1","pages":"123 - 131"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nutrition, Pharmacology, Neurological Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijnpnd.ijnpnd_70_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Dietitians and nutritionists have been identified as healthcare professionals who are well positioned to interpret and communicate aspects of nutritional genomics into practical and effective dietary recommendations. Therefore, the present study aimed to assess dietitians’ and nutritionists’ knowledge of essential concepts in nutritional genomics; and perceptions toward genetic testing. Methods: Prospective cross-sectional study was conducted among dietitians and nutritionists using an online questionnaire. The data were analyzed using descriptive and analytical statistics. Results: About 142 dietitians and nutritionists were included in the study. The majority of the respondents were female (88%). Around 61.3% had work experience ranging between 1 and 5 years. The knowledge score on nutritional genomics indicated 9% (n = 13) of them scored high, 42% (n = 59) scored medium, and 49% (n = 70) scored low scores. The average knowledge score was 42.3%, indicating a low level of knowledge of genetics and nutritional genomics. The mean perception was 3.85 on a scale from 1 (extremely negative) to 5 (extremely positive), which may be an overall positive perception of applying nutritional genomics into practical and effective dietary recommendations. The findings revealed a statistically significant link between knowledge and perception level, on-job training, and continuing education in nutritional genomics. Perception scores were shown to be positively associated with higher knowledge levels. Conclusions: Dietitians and nutritionists have low knowledge but a high perception level of nutritional genomic. Most of them were informed about nutrigenomics and had a favorable opinion, regardless of whether they had previously studied nutrigenomics as a college-level subject.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
营养学家和营养学家对营养基因组学的知识和对印度非传染性疾病(NCDs)预防和管理个性化方法的基因检测的看法:一项横断面调查
目的:营养师和营养学家被认为是医疗保健专业人员,他们能够很好地解释和交流营养基因组学的各个方面,并将其转化为实际有效的饮食建议。因此,本研究旨在评估营养学家和营养学家对营养基因组学基本概念的了解;以及对基因检测的看法。方法:采用在线问卷对营养学家和营养学家进行前瞻性横断面研究。采用描述性统计和分析性统计对数据进行分析。结果:约142名营养师和营养学家参与了研究。大多数受访者是女性(88%)。约61.3%的人有1至5年的工作经验。营养基因组学知识得分高的占9% (n = 13),中等的占42% (n = 59),低的占49% (n = 70)。平均知识得分为42.3%,表明对遗传学和营养基因组学的知识水平较低。在从1(极负)到5(极正)的范围内,平均感知为3.85,这可能是将营养基因组学应用于实际有效的饮食建议的总体积极感知。研究结果显示,营养基因组学的知识和感知水平、在职培训和继续教育之间存在统计学上显著的联系。感知得分被证明与更高的知识水平呈正相关。结论:营养师和营养学家对营养基因组的认知水平较低,但对营养基因组的认知水平较高。他们中的大多数人都了解营养基因组学,并且对营养基因组学持赞成态度,而不管他们之前是否将营养基因组学作为大学水平的课程来学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Nutrition, Pharmacology, Neurological Diseases (IJNPND) is an international, open access, peer reviewed journal which covers all fields related to nutrition, pharmacology, neurological diseases. IJNPND was started by Dr. Mohamed Essa based on his personal interest in Science in 2009. This journal doesn’t link with any society or any association. The co-editor-in chiefs of IJNPND (Prof. Gilles J. Guillemin, Dr. Abdur Rahman and Prof. Ross grant) and editorial board members are well known figures in the fields of Nutrition, pharmacology, and neuroscience. First, the journal was started as two issues per year, then it was changed into 3 issues per year and since 2013, it publishes 4 issues per year till now. This shows the slow and steady growth of this journal. To support the reviewers and editorial board members, IJNPND offers awards to the people who does more reviews within one year. The International Journal of Nutrition, Pharmacology, Neurological Diseases (IJNPND) is published Quarterly. IJNPND has three main sections, such as nutrition, pharmacology, and neurological diseases. IJNPND publishes Research Papers, Review Articles, Commentaries, case reports, brief communications and Correspondence in all three sections. Reviews and Commentaries are normally commissioned by the journal, but consideration will be given to unsolicited contributions. International Journal of Nutrition, Pharmacology, Neurological Diseases is included in the UGC-India Approved list of journals.
期刊最新文献
A Cross-Sectional Study to Determine the Prevalence and Predictors of Depression and Anxiety in Type 2 Diabetes Patients in South India Quality parameters determining the buyer behavior toward purchase of bakery product (cake) Analysis of Sodium Levels in Different Brands of Edible Salts by Flame Photometer Risk of COVID-19 among patients with respiratory illnesses and comorbidities at Eastern Province of Sri Lanka: A retrospective study Association of body mass index with dietary intake and self-care health activities of mothers after postpartum: A mixed-method research in Chennai City, India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1