Performance of Mesenchymal Cell-Scaffold Constructs in Human Oral Reconstructive Surgery: A Systematic Review

M. Cristalli, R. Marini, N. Pranno, R. Patini, G. L. Monaca, S. Annibali
{"title":"Performance of Mesenchymal Cell-Scaffold Constructs in Human Oral Reconstructive Surgery: A Systematic Review","authors":"M. Cristalli, R. Marini, N. Pranno, R. Patini, G. L. Monaca, S. Annibali","doi":"10.4172/2155-952X.1000225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Different sources of cultured cells combined with different scaffolds (allogenic, xenogeneic, alloplastic or composite materials) have been tested extensively in vitro and in preclinical animal studies, but there have been only a few clinical trials involving humans. \n \nAim: This study reviewed all of the English language literature published between January 1990 and December 2015 to assess the histological performance of different mesenchymal cell-scaffold constructs used for bone regeneration in human oral reconstructive procedures. \n \nMethods: An electronic search of the MEDLINE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases complemented by manual searching was conducted to identify studies involving histological evaluation of mesenchymal cell-scaffold constructs in human oral surgical procedures. The methodological quality of randomized controlled clinical trials and controlled clinical trials was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool for assessing the risk of bias. Heterogeneity was assessed using Review Manager software. Considering the heterogeneity, the data collected were reported by descriptive methods and a meta-analysis was applied only to the articles that reported the same outcome measures. The articles were classified and described based on the material scaffolds used. \n \nResults: The search identified 1030 titles and 287 abstracts. Full-text analysis was performed for 32 articles, revealing 14 studies that fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Three randomized controlled clinical trials were identified as potentially eligible for inclusion in a meta-analysis. The studies were grouped according to the scaffold materials used: bone allograft (three studies), polyglycolic-polylactic scaffold (four studies), collagen sponge (two studies), and bovine bone matrix (five studies). The stem cells used in these studies had been sourced from the iliac crest, periosteum, dental pulp and intraoral sites. \n \nConclusions: The very small amount of available data makes it impossible to draw any firm conclusions regarding the increase in bone formation in human oral reconstructive procedures when using graft materials engineered with autogenous stem cells.","PeriodicalId":15156,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biotechnology & biomaterials","volume":"322 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biotechnology & biomaterials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-952X.1000225","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Different sources of cultured cells combined with different scaffolds (allogenic, xenogeneic, alloplastic or composite materials) have been tested extensively in vitro and in preclinical animal studies, but there have been only a few clinical trials involving humans. Aim: This study reviewed all of the English language literature published between January 1990 and December 2015 to assess the histological performance of different mesenchymal cell-scaffold constructs used for bone regeneration in human oral reconstructive procedures. Methods: An electronic search of the MEDLINE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases complemented by manual searching was conducted to identify studies involving histological evaluation of mesenchymal cell-scaffold constructs in human oral surgical procedures. The methodological quality of randomized controlled clinical trials and controlled clinical trials was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool for assessing the risk of bias. Heterogeneity was assessed using Review Manager software. Considering the heterogeneity, the data collected were reported by descriptive methods and a meta-analysis was applied only to the articles that reported the same outcome measures. The articles were classified and described based on the material scaffolds used. Results: The search identified 1030 titles and 287 abstracts. Full-text analysis was performed for 32 articles, revealing 14 studies that fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Three randomized controlled clinical trials were identified as potentially eligible for inclusion in a meta-analysis. The studies were grouped according to the scaffold materials used: bone allograft (three studies), polyglycolic-polylactic scaffold (four studies), collagen sponge (two studies), and bovine bone matrix (five studies). The stem cells used in these studies had been sourced from the iliac crest, periosteum, dental pulp and intraoral sites. Conclusions: The very small amount of available data makes it impossible to draw any firm conclusions regarding the increase in bone formation in human oral reconstructive procedures when using graft materials engineered with autogenous stem cells.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
间充质细胞-支架结构在人类口腔重建手术中的表现:系统综述
背景:不同来源的培养细胞结合不同的支架(同种异体、异种、同种异体或复合材料)已经在体外和临床前动物研究中进行了广泛的测试,但只有少数涉及人体的临床试验。目的:本研究回顾了1990年1月至2015年12月期间发表的所有英文文献,以评估用于人类口腔重建手术中骨再生的不同间充质细胞-支架结构的组织学性能。方法:对MEDLINE和Cochrane中央对照试验数据库进行电子检索,并辅以人工检索,以确定涉及人类口腔外科手术中间充质细胞-支架构建的组织学评估的研究。随机对照临床试验和对照临床试验的方法学质量使用Cochrane协作工具评估偏倚风险。使用Review Manager软件评估异质性。考虑到异质性,收集的数据采用描述性方法报告,荟萃分析仅应用于报告相同结果测量的文章。根据所使用的支架材料对文章进行分类和描述。结果:检索到1030个标题和287个摘要。对32篇文章进行全文分析,发现14篇研究符合纳入标准。三个随机对照临床试验被确定为可能符合纳入荟萃分析的条件。研究根据使用的支架材料进行分组:同种异体骨移植物(3项研究)、聚乙醇-聚乳酸支架(4项研究)、胶原海绵(2项研究)和牛骨基质(5项研究)。这些研究中使用的干细胞来源于髂骨、骨膜、牙髓和口内部位。结论:由于现有的数据非常少,因此无法得出关于在使用自体干细胞工程移植材料时人类口腔重建过程中骨形成增加的任何确切结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Biodegradable microparticles with hierarchical topographical features influence mesenchymal stem cell behaviour Antimicrobial nano-fiber structures development to rejuvenate injured dura mater in brain surgery Cellulase production with Penicillium verruculosum strain in lab and pilot scale Human metaplastic breast carcinoma and decorin Epitranscriptomic blood biomarkers to manage psychiatric disorders
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1