Social Representations of a dictatorial past and current support of authoritarianism

Q4 Psychology Psico-USF Pub Date : 2023-07-24 DOI:10.1590/1413-82712023280214
Anderson Mathias, D. Páez, Elza M. Techio, Carolina Alzugaray, B. Camargo, Albert Moraes
{"title":"Social Representations of a dictatorial past and current support of authoritarianism","authors":"Anderson Mathias, D. Páez, Elza M. Techio, Carolina Alzugaray, B. Camargo, Albert Moraes","doi":"10.1590/1413-82712023280214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study analyzed the structure of social representations of an authoritarian regime in Brazil (Military Regime, 1964-1985), the variables associated with reporting different emotions about that past, and support for authoritarian solutions in the present. A sample of 200 participants aged 18 to 85 years (M = 31.54; SD = 13.84) responded to a free word association task in which they indicated three words that came to mind about the Military Regime. A prototypical analysis showed a critical representation as the majority. However, positive representations and a mute zone effect (silence of controversial opinions) were found. Participants also answered several questions about the regime, the emotions they feel, and the support for its restoration. Regression analyses showed different variables predicting positive and negative emotions, and positive representations strongly predicting support for a current authoritarian solution.","PeriodicalId":20767,"journal":{"name":"Psico-USF","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psico-USF","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-82712023280214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This study analyzed the structure of social representations of an authoritarian regime in Brazil (Military Regime, 1964-1985), the variables associated with reporting different emotions about that past, and support for authoritarian solutions in the present. A sample of 200 participants aged 18 to 85 years (M = 31.54; SD = 13.84) responded to a free word association task in which they indicated three words that came to mind about the Military Regime. A prototypical analysis showed a critical representation as the majority. However, positive representations and a mute zone effect (silence of controversial opinions) were found. Participants also answered several questions about the regime, the emotions they feel, and the support for its restoration. Regression analyses showed different variables predicting positive and negative emotions, and positive representations strongly predicting support for a current authoritarian solution.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
独裁过去的社会表征和当前对威权主义的支持
摘要:本研究分析了巴西独裁政权(军事政权,1964-1985)的社会表征结构,与报告过去不同情绪相关的变量,以及当前对独裁解决方案的支持。200名年龄在18至85岁之间的参与者(M = 31.54;SD = 13.84)回答了一个自由单词联想任务,在这个任务中,他们指出了三个在他们脑海中出现的关于军事政权的单词。一个原型分析显示临界代表为多数。然而,积极表征和沉默区效应(有争议的意见沉默)被发现。参与者还回答了有关该政权的几个问题,他们的感受,以及对其恢复的支持。回归分析显示,不同的变量预测积极和消极情绪,积极表征强烈预测支持当前的专制解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psico-USF
Psico-USF Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊最新文献
Hope, health and cure: the meanings of the vaccine against COVID-19 Questionário de Adaptação ao Ensino Superior Remoto: Ampliação das Propriedades Psicométricas Evidence of Intervention Effectiveness with Engaging Leaders in Hospital Physiotherapy Autocompaixão em Estudantes Universitários: Revisão Integrativa da Literatura Impacto Psicossocial da Pandemia de COVID-19 na Saúde Mental de Pessoas Transexuais e Travestis: Revisão Integrativa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1