Experimental Evaluation of Sand Porosity in Eagle Ford Shale Fractures

A. Elsarawy, H. Nasr-El-Din
{"title":"Experimental Evaluation of Sand Porosity in Eagle Ford Shale Fractures","authors":"A. Elsarawy, H. Nasr-El-Din","doi":"10.2118/191240-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Hydraulic fracturing is the main stimulation method used to economically produce from shale formations. The method requires the injection of a fracturing fluid at a pressure which is high enough to fracture the formation, and as a result, improves the well productivity. A proppant is pumped with the fracturing fluid to prevent the closure of the induced fractures after the treatment. The proppant inside the fracture is subjected to a high earth closure stress, which causes proppant crushing, embedment, and compaction mechanisms. The subsequent reduction of the fracture width and proppant porosity reduces the fracture conductivity and could be crucial to the success of the fracturing treatments. The objective of this study is to experimentally evaluate the reduction of the propped fracture width and proppant porosity between two Eagle Ford shale samples under stress conditions.\n An experimental model of propped fracture in Eagle Ford shale was prepared using outcrop samples. Sand proppant of the size 20/40, 40/70, and 100-mesh were tested at the concentrations of 0.2, 0.4, and 0.6 lb/ft2. A high-pressure core holder with modified fittings was used to subject the fracture model to different closure stress values up to 8,000 psia. A new method was used to evaluate the change in the propped fracture width and proppant porosity as a function of closure stress. The fracture width was measured by the consecutive imaging of the fracture under stress using a digital borescope and an image analysis software. The change in the proppant porosity was calculated at each stress and post-experiment sieve analysis was done to quantify the crushed proppant due to the applied stress.\n The fracture width and the equivalent proppant porosity under stress were found to be a function of the proppant size and concentration. The proppant porosity under stress was found to be directly proportional to the proppant concentration and inversely proportional to the proppant size. The reduction in fracture width and proppant porosity due to stress ranged from 3.66 to 22.03% and from 5.29 to 39.85% respectively. The crushing of sand proppant was found to be as high as 28.03% at 8,000 psia and 0.2 lb/ft2 proppant concentration, and reduced by increasing its concentration or decreasing its size.\n The propped fracture width and proppant porosity under stress can be used as inputs to well production models, reservoir simulation models, and fracture design calculations. The results can also be used in the proppant selection process to improve the fracture conductivity and maximize the well productivity of Eagle Ford shale formations.","PeriodicalId":11006,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Wed, June 27, 2018","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Wed, June 27, 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/191240-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Hydraulic fracturing is the main stimulation method used to economically produce from shale formations. The method requires the injection of a fracturing fluid at a pressure which is high enough to fracture the formation, and as a result, improves the well productivity. A proppant is pumped with the fracturing fluid to prevent the closure of the induced fractures after the treatment. The proppant inside the fracture is subjected to a high earth closure stress, which causes proppant crushing, embedment, and compaction mechanisms. The subsequent reduction of the fracture width and proppant porosity reduces the fracture conductivity and could be crucial to the success of the fracturing treatments. The objective of this study is to experimentally evaluate the reduction of the propped fracture width and proppant porosity between two Eagle Ford shale samples under stress conditions. An experimental model of propped fracture in Eagle Ford shale was prepared using outcrop samples. Sand proppant of the size 20/40, 40/70, and 100-mesh were tested at the concentrations of 0.2, 0.4, and 0.6 lb/ft2. A high-pressure core holder with modified fittings was used to subject the fracture model to different closure stress values up to 8,000 psia. A new method was used to evaluate the change in the propped fracture width and proppant porosity as a function of closure stress. The fracture width was measured by the consecutive imaging of the fracture under stress using a digital borescope and an image analysis software. The change in the proppant porosity was calculated at each stress and post-experiment sieve analysis was done to quantify the crushed proppant due to the applied stress. The fracture width and the equivalent proppant porosity under stress were found to be a function of the proppant size and concentration. The proppant porosity under stress was found to be directly proportional to the proppant concentration and inversely proportional to the proppant size. The reduction in fracture width and proppant porosity due to stress ranged from 3.66 to 22.03% and from 5.29 to 39.85% respectively. The crushing of sand proppant was found to be as high as 28.03% at 8,000 psia and 0.2 lb/ft2 proppant concentration, and reduced by increasing its concentration or decreasing its size. The propped fracture width and proppant porosity under stress can be used as inputs to well production models, reservoir simulation models, and fracture design calculations. The results can also be used in the proppant selection process to improve the fracture conductivity and maximize the well productivity of Eagle Ford shale formations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Eagle Ford页岩裂缝砂岩孔隙度实验评价
水力压裂是页岩地层经济开采的主要增产方法。该方法需要在足够高的压力下注入压裂液以破裂地层,从而提高油井产能。支撑剂与压裂液一起泵入,以防止压裂后诱发裂缝的闭合。裂缝内的支撑剂受到较高的闭合应力,导致支撑剂破碎、嵌入和压实机制。随后,裂缝宽度和支撑剂孔隙度的减小降低了裂缝导流能力,这对压裂作业的成功与否至关重要。本研究的目的是通过实验评估在应力条件下Eagle Ford页岩样品之间的支撑裂缝宽度和支撑剂孔隙度的减小。利用露头样品建立了Eagle Ford页岩支撑裂缝实验模型。分别在0.2、0.4和0.6 lb/ft2的浓度下测试了尺寸为20/40、40/70和100目的支撑砂。采用改良管件的高压岩心固定器,使裂缝模型承受高达8000 psia的不同闭合应力值。采用了一种新的方法来评估支撑裂缝宽度和支撑剂孔隙度随闭合应力的变化。裂缝宽度是通过使用数字井眼镜和图像分析软件对应力作用下的裂缝进行连续成像来测量的。计算了每种应力下支撑剂孔隙度的变化,并进行了实验后的筛分分析,以量化由于施加应力而破碎的支撑剂。应力作用下的裂缝宽度和等效支撑剂孔隙度是支撑剂尺寸和浓度的函数。应力作用下支撑剂孔隙度与支撑剂浓度成正比,与支撑剂粒径成反比。应力对裂缝宽度和支撑剂孔隙度的影响分别为3.66 ~ 22.03%和5.29 ~ 39.85%。在8000 psia和0.2 lb/ft2的支撑剂浓度下,砂支撑剂的破碎率高达28.03%,通过增加支撑剂浓度或减小支撑剂尺寸来降低破碎率。在应力作用下,支撑裂缝宽度和支撑剂孔隙度可以作为油井生产模型、油藏模拟模型和裂缝设计计算的输入。研究结果也可用于支撑剂的选择过程,以提高Eagle Ford页岩地层的裂缝导流能力,并最大限度地提高油井产能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Application of Integrated Dynamic Asset Modeling to Predict and Resolve Production Instabilities in an Offshore Facility, A Case Study, Mexico The Casing Deformation During Shale Gas Hydraulic Fracturing: Why it is so Serious in Weiyuan-Changning, China? Re-Evaluating Contributions from Thin Bedded Reservoirs: Integrated Reservoir Modelling of the Greater Dolphin Area Experimental Evaluation of Sand Porosity in Eagle Ford Shale Fractures An Experimental Investigation of Proppant Diagenesis and Proppant-Formation-Fluid Interactions in Hydraulic Fracturing of Eagle Ford Shale
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1