Risk-Averse Importance Sampling of Tree Attributes in High-Risk Forested Areas

IF 1.5 4区 农林科学 Q2 FORESTRY Forest Science Pub Date : 2023-04-11 DOI:10.1093/forsci/fxad022
Francis A. Roesch, T. A. Schroeder, J. McCollum
{"title":"Risk-Averse Importance Sampling of Tree Attributes in High-Risk Forested Areas","authors":"Francis A. Roesch, T. A. Schroeder, J. McCollum","doi":"10.1093/forsci/fxad022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This study develops the theory of risk-averse importance sampling and explains its potential application to forest inventory estimation through the use of a heuristic simulation. When the risk-producing elements of the landscape are known, a risk-averse sampling strategy can be created that results in fewer samples in high-risk areas. Our simulation shows that for certain high-risk populations, risk-averse importance sampling can be highly effective at reducing both risk to field crew members (requiring only 10% of the plot visits in the riskiest category) and sample variance relative to simple random sampling. The method is shown to be especially helpful when a population of values of interest decreases with increasing risk, with a reduction in mean square error (MSE) of 84% to 99% in these cases. The simulation also showed the opposite effect on MSE can be expected when values of interest increase with increasing risk. By increasing field crew safety, risk-averse importance sampling should also improve the frequency and accuracy of field observations, potentially leading to even bigger gains in estimate precision. We recommend risk-averse importance sampling any time hazardous conditions can result in a high number of missing observations and reasonably accurate characterizations of landscape risks can be developed.\n Study Implications: During the collection of forest inventory data, the safety of field personnel is always of primary importance, but never has the safety of personnel been a component of the sample design. This study develops a risk-averse importance sampling strategy that provides a low-risk probability sample of field observations in high-risk areas for interested practitioners. The low-risk probability sample can be created when the risk-producing elements of the forested area are known and can be described in functional form. The method is shown to be especially helpful when a population of values of interest decrease with increasing risk. It is hypothesized that if a probability sample is defined that will reduce the sample in the riskiest areas and increase safety in the field, both response rates and the accuracy of field measurements will increase, and, in turn, will lead to a reduction in the variance of the final estimates. Risk-averse importance sampling is recommended any time it is likely to lead to a higher level of safety and observational success.","PeriodicalId":12749,"journal":{"name":"Forest Science","volume":"370 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/forsci/fxad022","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study develops the theory of risk-averse importance sampling and explains its potential application to forest inventory estimation through the use of a heuristic simulation. When the risk-producing elements of the landscape are known, a risk-averse sampling strategy can be created that results in fewer samples in high-risk areas. Our simulation shows that for certain high-risk populations, risk-averse importance sampling can be highly effective at reducing both risk to field crew members (requiring only 10% of the plot visits in the riskiest category) and sample variance relative to simple random sampling. The method is shown to be especially helpful when a population of values of interest decreases with increasing risk, with a reduction in mean square error (MSE) of 84% to 99% in these cases. The simulation also showed the opposite effect on MSE can be expected when values of interest increase with increasing risk. By increasing field crew safety, risk-averse importance sampling should also improve the frequency and accuracy of field observations, potentially leading to even bigger gains in estimate precision. We recommend risk-averse importance sampling any time hazardous conditions can result in a high number of missing observations and reasonably accurate characterizations of landscape risks can be developed. Study Implications: During the collection of forest inventory data, the safety of field personnel is always of primary importance, but never has the safety of personnel been a component of the sample design. This study develops a risk-averse importance sampling strategy that provides a low-risk probability sample of field observations in high-risk areas for interested practitioners. The low-risk probability sample can be created when the risk-producing elements of the forested area are known and can be described in functional form. The method is shown to be especially helpful when a population of values of interest decrease with increasing risk. It is hypothesized that if a probability sample is defined that will reduce the sample in the riskiest areas and increase safety in the field, both response rates and the accuracy of field measurements will increase, and, in turn, will lead to a reduction in the variance of the final estimates. Risk-averse importance sampling is recommended any time it is likely to lead to a higher level of safety and observational success.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高风险林区树木属性的风险规避重要性抽样
本研究发展了风险厌恶重要性抽样理论,并通过启发式模拟解释了其在森林清查估计中的潜在应用。当已知景观中产生风险的因素时,可以制定规避风险的采样策略,从而减少高风险地区的样本。我们的模拟表明,对于某些高风险人群,风险规避重要性抽样可以非常有效地降低现场工作人员的风险(在风险最高的类别中只需要10%的地块访问)和相对于简单随机抽样的样本方差。当感兴趣的总体值随着风险的增加而减少时,该方法被证明是特别有用的,在这些情况下,均方误差(MSE)减少了84%到99%。模拟还表明,当利息值随着风险的增加而增加时,可以预期对MSE的相反影响。通过提高现场工作人员的安全性,规避风险的重要性抽样也应该提高现场观测的频率和准确性,从而可能导致估计精度的更大提高。我们建议在任何时候进行风险规避重要性采样,危险条件可能导致大量的观测缺失,并且可以开发出合理准确的景观风险特征。研究意义:在森林清查数据的收集过程中,现场人员的安全始终是最重要的,但人员的安全从未成为样本设计的一个组成部分。本研究开发了一种风险规避的重要抽样策略,为感兴趣的从业者提供高风险地区现场观察的低风险概率样本。当林区产生风险的要素已知并可以用函数形式描述时,就可以创建低风险概率样本。当感兴趣的值随着风险的增加而减少时,该方法被证明是特别有用的。假设如果定义一个概率样本,将减少最危险区域的样本并增加现场的安全性,则现场测量的响应率和准确性都将增加,并且反过来将导致最终估计的方差减少。风险规避重要性抽样是推荐的任何时候,它可能导致更高的安全性和观察的成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Forest Science
Forest Science 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
7.10%
发文量
45
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Forest Science is a peer-reviewed journal publishing fundamental and applied research that explores all aspects of natural and social sciences as they apply to the function and management of the forested ecosystems of the world. Topics include silviculture, forest management, biometrics, economics, entomology & pathology, fire & fuels management, forest ecology, genetics & tree improvement, geospatial technologies, harvesting & utilization, landscape ecology, operations research, forest policy, physiology, recreation, social sciences, soils & hydrology, and wildlife management. Forest Science is published bimonthly in February, April, June, August, October, and December.
期刊最新文献
Selective Postplanting Forb Control Increased Growth of Douglas-Fir but Not Western Larch Seedlings in Idaho Accuracy of Whitebark Pine and Limber Pine Identification by Forest Inventory and Analysis Field Crews Applying Ratio-of-Means Estimation for Annualized Components of Volume Change in Forest Resource Monitoring Genetic Variability for Clonal Propagation of Acacia mearnsii Cointegration of Timberland Value in the United States, South and Central America, and Oceania
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1