The Impact of Relationship Wellness Checkups with Gay Male Couples

M. Minten, C. Dykeman
{"title":"The Impact of Relationship Wellness Checkups with Gay Male Couples","authors":"M. Minten, C. Dykeman","doi":"10.34296/02011024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Relationship health impacts many other health outcomes, including physical and mental wellbeing and the health of children in the family system (Goeke-Morey, Cummings, & Papp, 2007; Jaremka, Glaser, Malarkey, & Kiecolt-Glaser, 2013; Jaremka, Lindgren, & Kiecolt-Glaser, 2013; Pihet, Bodenmann, Cina, Widmer, & Shantinath, 2007; Rappaport, 2013; Robles, Slatcher, Trombello, & McGinn, 2014). Despite the importance of relationship health, couples do not regularly seek support for maintaining their connection (Eubanks-Fleming & Cordova, 2012). Early intervention programs that provide support are a growing public health initiative (Cowan & Cowan, 2014). One brief early intervention program, the Marriage Checkup (MC), positively impacts relationship satisfaction, prevents decline, and improves health on other relationship variables such as intimacy (Cordova, 2014). To date, the MC research has included only heterosexual couples. This study explored the question, “What is the impact of a relationship wellness checkup on gay male couples’ relationship satisfaction?” Using single-subject multiple-baseline, multiple-probe design, this study extends MC research to include gay may couples. Findings showed that the MC positively influenced satisfaction (NAP .73) for the group overall. In an analysis of each couple, two of the three couples improved and one couple showed a slight decline in satisfaction. The likely confounding event for this third couple was their marriage and honeymoon during the baseline phase. In light of research with newlywed and engaged couples from other studies, overall the results tentatively suggest the MC may increase satisfaction for gay male couples with additional research needed for newlywed couples.","PeriodicalId":93200,"journal":{"name":"Journal of counseling sexology & sexual wellness : research, practice, and education","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of counseling sexology & sexual wellness : research, practice, and education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34296/02011024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Relationship health impacts many other health outcomes, including physical and mental wellbeing and the health of children in the family system (Goeke-Morey, Cummings, & Papp, 2007; Jaremka, Glaser, Malarkey, & Kiecolt-Glaser, 2013; Jaremka, Lindgren, & Kiecolt-Glaser, 2013; Pihet, Bodenmann, Cina, Widmer, & Shantinath, 2007; Rappaport, 2013; Robles, Slatcher, Trombello, & McGinn, 2014). Despite the importance of relationship health, couples do not regularly seek support for maintaining their connection (Eubanks-Fleming & Cordova, 2012). Early intervention programs that provide support are a growing public health initiative (Cowan & Cowan, 2014). One brief early intervention program, the Marriage Checkup (MC), positively impacts relationship satisfaction, prevents decline, and improves health on other relationship variables such as intimacy (Cordova, 2014). To date, the MC research has included only heterosexual couples. This study explored the question, “What is the impact of a relationship wellness checkup on gay male couples’ relationship satisfaction?” Using single-subject multiple-baseline, multiple-probe design, this study extends MC research to include gay may couples. Findings showed that the MC positively influenced satisfaction (NAP .73) for the group overall. In an analysis of each couple, two of the three couples improved and one couple showed a slight decline in satisfaction. The likely confounding event for this third couple was their marriage and honeymoon during the baseline phase. In light of research with newlywed and engaged couples from other studies, overall the results tentatively suggest the MC may increase satisfaction for gay male couples with additional research needed for newlywed couples.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
男同性恋伴侣关系健康检查的影响
关系健康影响许多其他健康结果,包括身体和心理健康以及家庭系统中儿童的健康(Goeke-Morey, Cummings, & Papp, 2007;Jaremka, Glaser, Malarkey, & Kiecolt-Glaser, 2013;Jaremka, Lindgren, & Kiecolt-Glaser, 2013;Pihet, Bodenmann, china, Widmer, & Shantinath, 2007;Rappaport, 2013;Robles, Slatcher, Trombello, & McGinn, 2014)。尽管关系健康很重要,但夫妻并不会定期寻求支持来维持他们的关系(Eubanks-Fleming & Cordova, 2012)。提供支持的早期干预方案是一项日益增长的公共卫生倡议(Cowan & Cowan, 2014)。一个简短的早期干预计划,婚姻检查(MC),积极影响关系满意度,防止下降,并改善健康的其他关系变量,如亲密关系(Cordova, 2014)。到目前为止,MC的研究只包括异性恋夫妇。这项研究探讨了这样一个问题:“关系健康检查对男同性恋伴侣的关系满意度有什么影响?”采用单受试者多基线、多探针设计,本研究将MC研究扩展到包括同性恋伴侣。调查结果显示,集体管理对整体满意度有正向影响(NAP .73)。在对每对夫妇的分析中,三对夫妇中的两对改善了,一对夫妇的满意度略有下降。这第三对夫妇可能的混淆事件是他们在基线阶段的婚姻和蜜月。根据其他研究对新婚夫妇和订婚夫妇的研究,总体结果初步表明,MC可能会增加男同性恋夫妇的满意度,但需要对新婚夫妇进行更多的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mapping Sex Therapy Across the United States: An Exploratory Study Potential Benefits of Sexting among Long-term Monogamous Romantic Partners Understanding Education in Sexuality Counseling from the Lens of Trainees: A Critical Examination and Call for Increased Attention and Training Sexuality and Disability in Rehabilitation Counseling Curricula: Rehabilitation Counselor Educators’ Attitudes, Comfort, and Knowledge The Gender Freedom Model: A Framework for Helping Transgender, Non-Binary, and Gender Questioning Clients Transition With More Ease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1