Perspectives of Medical Students on E-Learning in the Surgery Module

IF 0.2 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Health Care Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.4103/ajprhc.ajprhc_87_22
S. Idris, A. Fathuldeen, Ahmed Majeed Al-Shammari, E. Khalifah, F. Alrashid, Abdulaziz Alqahtani, F. Alenazi, S. Alruwaili, M. Alshmmri
{"title":"Perspectives of Medical Students on E-Learning in the Surgery Module","authors":"S. Idris, A. Fathuldeen, Ahmed Majeed Al-Shammari, E. Khalifah, F. Alrashid, Abdulaziz Alqahtani, F. Alenazi, S. Alruwaili, M. Alshmmri","doi":"10.4103/ajprhc.ajprhc_87_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: The goal of this study was to explore medical students' perceptions, assess their experiences, and identify obstacles to e-learning during the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as to understand the factors behind its adoption and application as a learning means in the surgery module. Materials and Methods: Data were gathered from undergraduate medical students, at the University of Hail, KSA, in their surgery module using an electronic questionnaire. Subsequently, SPSS version 25.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) has been used for analysis. Results: The study included 72 students, with a participation rate of 85.7%. Students positively perceived technology (M = 4.024 ± 0.94 and P < 0.001). Most respondents (79.5%) claimed that e-learning required less time for studying than the conventional learning technique (M = 4.14 ± 1.052 and P < 0.001). They had positive perceptions of the implications of e-learning (M = 3.92 ± 0.89 and P < 0.001). Regarding the perception toward instructors, 53.9% admitted that when instructors use computer technologies, it adequately met their needs. The mean agreeability to online quizzes was high (M = 3.8264 ± 0.910). More than half preferred the blended style of learning. A-70.9% interested in using e-learning (M = 3.83 ± 1.278 and P < 0.001). There was no statistical difference among genders (P > 0.05). Conclusion: This study addresses the determinants behind the adoption and use of e-learning within the surgery module. Therefore, it will support the event of a rational approach to an effective application of e-learning and look at it as a positive initiative toward development and alteration.","PeriodicalId":8534,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Health Care","volume":"55 1","pages":"34 - 41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ajprhc.ajprhc_87_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The goal of this study was to explore medical students' perceptions, assess their experiences, and identify obstacles to e-learning during the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as to understand the factors behind its adoption and application as a learning means in the surgery module. Materials and Methods: Data were gathered from undergraduate medical students, at the University of Hail, KSA, in their surgery module using an electronic questionnaire. Subsequently, SPSS version 25.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) has been used for analysis. Results: The study included 72 students, with a participation rate of 85.7%. Students positively perceived technology (M = 4.024 ± 0.94 and P < 0.001). Most respondents (79.5%) claimed that e-learning required less time for studying than the conventional learning technique (M = 4.14 ± 1.052 and P < 0.001). They had positive perceptions of the implications of e-learning (M = 3.92 ± 0.89 and P < 0.001). Regarding the perception toward instructors, 53.9% admitted that when instructors use computer technologies, it adequately met their needs. The mean agreeability to online quizzes was high (M = 3.8264 ± 0.910). More than half preferred the blended style of learning. A-70.9% interested in using e-learning (M = 3.83 ± 1.278 and P < 0.001). There was no statistical difference among genders (P > 0.05). Conclusion: This study addresses the determinants behind the adoption and use of e-learning within the surgery module. Therefore, it will support the event of a rational approach to an effective application of e-learning and look at it as a positive initiative toward development and alteration.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医学生对外科模块电子学习的看法
目的:本研究的目的是探讨医学生在COVID-19大流行期间对电子学习的看法,评估他们的经历,并确定障碍,以及了解其作为外科模块学习手段的采用和应用背后的因素。材料和方法:使用电子问卷从KSA Hail大学的本科医科学生的外科模块中收集数据。随后,SPSS version 25.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA)被用于分析。结果:共纳入72名学生,参与率为85.7%。学生积极感知科技(M = 4.024±0.94,P < 0.001)。大多数受访者(79.5%)认为网络学习比传统学习方法所需的学习时间更少(M = 4.14±1.052,P < 0.001)。他们对网络学习的影响有积极的认知(M = 3.92±0.89,P < 0.001)。在对教师的看法方面,53.9%的人承认教师使用计算机技术可以充分满足他们的需求。对在线测验的平均接受度较高(M = 3.8264±0.910)。超过一半的学生更喜欢混合式学习方式。A-70.9%对使用电子学习感兴趣(M = 3.83±1.278,P < 0.001)。性别间差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。结论:本研究解决了外科模块中采用和使用电子学习背后的决定因素。因此,它将支持一种合理的方法来有效地应用电子学习,并将其视为发展和变革的积极举措。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Establishing Escherichia coli on Balb/C Rats as A Model of Preterm Labor Headache Characteristic in Covid-19 Infected Patient: A Systematic Review Exploring The Relationship Between Lactate Dehydrogenase Levels, Leukocyte Counts, Low Birth Weight, and The Severity of Preeclampsia in Pregnant Women: A Cross-Sectional Study at Saiful Anwar Hospital Malang (July 2021 to June 2022) A Challenging Case: Colorectal Cancer During Pregnancy The Relationship and Factors The Parenting Style of Parents Who Married Early with The Development of Children Aged 1-5 Years
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1