Transparency and the audit industry? Not in the U.S. Evidence on audit production costs, profitability and partner compensation from the U.K.

Thomas J. Frecka , Jeremy B. Griffin , Jennifer Sustersic Stevens
{"title":"Transparency and the audit industry? Not in the U.S. Evidence on audit production costs, profitability and partner compensation from the U.K.","authors":"Thomas J. Frecka ,&nbsp;Jeremy B. Griffin ,&nbsp;Jennifer Sustersic Stevens","doi":"10.1016/j.racreg.2018.09.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the U.S., the investing public can readily access a great deal of information about publicly-traded companies. However, the large private accounting firms that audit those companies—and that are just as economically significant—provide very little information. This paper provides insight into the audit markets by taking a novel, descriptive approach to explore the cost of performing audits, an under-examined area in the literature due to lack of data. The analyses explore audit production costs, profitability, and partner compensation at the audit-firm level, using publicly available data from the U.K. The findings suggest interesting potential differences in audit production functions between the Big Four firms, an important factor when considering the competitiveness of the audit market. Taking this analysis and applying it to the U.S. setting, an estimate of the average profitability per domestic Big Four partner is approximately $1.2 million for the year 2013. This paper intends to stimulate discussion about how public accounting firms are regulated in the U.S.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101074,"journal":{"name":"Research in Accounting Regulation","volume":"30 2","pages":"Pages 73-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.racreg.2018.09.005","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Accounting Regulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1052045718300298","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In the U.S., the investing public can readily access a great deal of information about publicly-traded companies. However, the large private accounting firms that audit those companies—and that are just as economically significant—provide very little information. This paper provides insight into the audit markets by taking a novel, descriptive approach to explore the cost of performing audits, an under-examined area in the literature due to lack of data. The analyses explore audit production costs, profitability, and partner compensation at the audit-firm level, using publicly available data from the U.K. The findings suggest interesting potential differences in audit production functions between the Big Four firms, an important factor when considering the competitiveness of the audit market. Taking this analysis and applying it to the U.S. setting, an estimate of the average profitability per domestic Big Four partner is approximately $1.2 million for the year 2013. This paper intends to stimulate discussion about how public accounting firms are regulated in the U.S.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
透明度和审计行业?来自英国的关于审计生产成本、盈利能力和合伙人薪酬的证据
在美国,投资大众可以很容易地获得大量有关上市公司的信息。然而,审计这些公司的大型私人会计师事务所——它们在经济上同样重要——提供的信息很少。本文通过采用一种新颖的描述性方法来探索执行审计的成本,从而深入了解审计市场,这是由于缺乏数据而在文献中未得到充分研究的领域。本文利用英国的公开数据,分析了审计事务所层面的审计生产成本、盈利能力和合伙人薪酬。研究结果表明,四大会计师事务所之间在审计生产职能方面存在有趣的潜在差异,这是考虑审计市场竞争力的一个重要因素。将这一分析应用到美国的情况下,预计2013年四大国内合伙人的平均盈利能力约为120万美元。本文旨在激发有关美国如何监管公共会计师事务所的讨论
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Value relevance of customer-related intangible assets Transparency and the audit industry? Not in the U.S. Evidence on audit production costs, profitability and partner compensation from the U.K. Financial statement comparability and segment disclosure The mitigation of high-growth-related accounting distortions after sarbanes-oxley
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1