In Conversation: Art Is Not the Archive

IF 0.1 3区 艺术学 0 ART ARCHIVES OF AMERICAN ART JOURNAL Pub Date : 2018-09-01 DOI:10.1086/701178
David M. Lubin, Anne Collins Goodyear, M. Coffey, Emily C. Burns, John Fagg, A. Boylan, D. Getsy, Kristina Wilson, L. Saltzman, Ross Barrett, Alexander Nemerov
{"title":"In Conversation: Art Is Not the Archive","authors":"David M. Lubin, Anne Collins Goodyear, M. Coffey, Emily C. Burns, John Fagg, A. Boylan, D. Getsy, Kristina Wilson, L. Saltzman, Ross Barrett, Alexander Nemerov","doi":"10.1086/701178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In our fall 2017 issue, art historian Alexander Nemerov explored a question of vital interest to this journal and its readers: How might we describe the relationship between artworks and archives? He applied this question to the case of nineteenth-century American painter John Quidor, whose historical and literary subjects scholar Ross Barrett has connected to the artist’s fervor for land speculation. Nemerov commended Barrett for deftly yoking Quidor’s art to his social context, supported by archival evidence. Yet Nemerov maintained that art can still be “a thing apart” from the social realm, marked by its “otherness” and thus not wholly explained by the archive. These ideas have sparked much debate among art historians, and so we invited a selection of them to respond with their own questions and case studies. The eleven texts featured here represent a variety of research areas and methodologies, and conclude with reflections by both Barrett and Nemerov.","PeriodicalId":41204,"journal":{"name":"ARCHIVES OF AMERICAN ART JOURNAL","volume":"5 1","pages":"62 - 77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARCHIVES OF AMERICAN ART JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/701178","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In our fall 2017 issue, art historian Alexander Nemerov explored a question of vital interest to this journal and its readers: How might we describe the relationship between artworks and archives? He applied this question to the case of nineteenth-century American painter John Quidor, whose historical and literary subjects scholar Ross Barrett has connected to the artist’s fervor for land speculation. Nemerov commended Barrett for deftly yoking Quidor’s art to his social context, supported by archival evidence. Yet Nemerov maintained that art can still be “a thing apart” from the social realm, marked by its “otherness” and thus not wholly explained by the archive. These ideas have sparked much debate among art historians, and so we invited a selection of them to respond with their own questions and case studies. The eleven texts featured here represent a variety of research areas and methodologies, and conclude with reflections by both Barrett and Nemerov.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对话:艺术不是档案
在我们2017年秋季刊中,艺术史学家亚历山大·内梅罗夫(Alexander Nemerov)探讨了本刊及其读者非常感兴趣的一个问题:我们该如何描述艺术品与档案之间的关系?他将这个问题应用到19世纪美国画家约翰·魁地尔的案例中,他的历史和文学主题学者罗斯·巴雷特(Ross Barrett)将其与这位艺术家对土地投机的狂热联系起来。内梅罗夫称赞巴雷特巧妙地将魁地尔艺术与他的社会背景结合在一起,并得到了档案证据的支持。然而,内梅罗夫坚持认为,艺术仍然可以是社会领域之外的“一种东西”,以其“他者性”为标志,因此不能完全由档案来解释。这些想法在艺术史学家中引发了很多争论,所以我们邀请了他们中的一些人来回答他们自己的问题和案例研究。这里精选的11篇文章代表了各种研究领域和方法,并以Barrett和Nemerov的反思作为总结。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊最新文献
Being There: The Singularity of Oral History Front Matter Albert Murray’s Approach to Oral Art History: An Epistolary Exploration About the Archives of American Art Oral History
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1