Assessing the Impact of Open Hole Gravel Pack Completions to Remediate the Observed Productivity Decline in Cased Hole FracPack Completions in Deepwater Gulf of Mexico Fields

K. Zaki, Yan Li, C. Terry
{"title":"Assessing the Impact of Open Hole Gravel Pack Completions to Remediate the Observed Productivity Decline in Cased Hole FracPack Completions in Deepwater Gulf of Mexico Fields","authors":"K. Zaki, Yan Li, C. Terry","doi":"10.2118/191731-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The objective of this work is to assess the impact on productivity decline of altering the completion type in a deepwater Miocene reservoir. Typically to date, these types of assets have utilized Cased Hole FracPack (CHFP) completions as a basis of design. Wells in the Gulf of Mexico targeting the deepwater Miocene plays have seen significant Productivity Index (PI) decline within the first few years of production.\n Open Hole Gravel Pack (OHGP) and Open Hole FracPack (OHFP) completion types were selected as potential alternatives to CHFP. A coupled well, reservoir and geomechanical model was created to assess the impact of multiple potential damage components on matching the observed inflow performance from production logs. The model assesses probabilistically the weighting of each of six damage mechanisms (creep, fracture conductivity, fines migration, fracture connectivity, off-plane perforation contribution and drilling/completion fluid damage) on well performance. Based on this weighting, an assessment can then be made of their impact on the alternate completion types.\n Previous studies (Knobles et al. 2017) have indicated that cased hole completions are particularly susceptible to PI decline. Specifically, when unpropped perforation tunnels collapse, they reduce the inflow area into the wellbore and create a flow restriction. In higher permeability formations, the perforations not connected to the fracture (i.e. off-plane perforations) can contribute a significant portion of the well's production. It is important to note that if the connectivity and packing of the perforations is optimized and fracture is placed to within design specifications, little PI decline is observed. However, in the real world, this is not always the case. Three wells were used in this analysis. Two wells where decline was observed and a third well where no significant decline was observed. Results from the study indicated that if the two underperforming wells had utilized an OHGP completion, the PI degradation would have been mitigated. However, the upside production seen from the third well would not be attainable had the well been completed as an OHGP on an equivalent well trajectory. The results of the study also indicated that minimizing the drilling damage would be integral to the success of the OHGP completion in comparison to optimizing the completion placement in a CHFP.\n The paper addresses a significant issue of PI decline affecting deepwater wells and presents a potential remediation technique based on alternate completion types. The paper also presents a new methodology based on Design of Experiment to assess the contribution of various damage mechanism while incorporating the uncertainty around each based on available measurements.","PeriodicalId":11015,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Mon, September 24, 2018","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Mon, September 24, 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/191731-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The objective of this work is to assess the impact on productivity decline of altering the completion type in a deepwater Miocene reservoir. Typically to date, these types of assets have utilized Cased Hole FracPack (CHFP) completions as a basis of design. Wells in the Gulf of Mexico targeting the deepwater Miocene plays have seen significant Productivity Index (PI) decline within the first few years of production. Open Hole Gravel Pack (OHGP) and Open Hole FracPack (OHFP) completion types were selected as potential alternatives to CHFP. A coupled well, reservoir and geomechanical model was created to assess the impact of multiple potential damage components on matching the observed inflow performance from production logs. The model assesses probabilistically the weighting of each of six damage mechanisms (creep, fracture conductivity, fines migration, fracture connectivity, off-plane perforation contribution and drilling/completion fluid damage) on well performance. Based on this weighting, an assessment can then be made of their impact on the alternate completion types. Previous studies (Knobles et al. 2017) have indicated that cased hole completions are particularly susceptible to PI decline. Specifically, when unpropped perforation tunnels collapse, they reduce the inflow area into the wellbore and create a flow restriction. In higher permeability formations, the perforations not connected to the fracture (i.e. off-plane perforations) can contribute a significant portion of the well's production. It is important to note that if the connectivity and packing of the perforations is optimized and fracture is placed to within design specifications, little PI decline is observed. However, in the real world, this is not always the case. Three wells were used in this analysis. Two wells where decline was observed and a third well where no significant decline was observed. Results from the study indicated that if the two underperforming wells had utilized an OHGP completion, the PI degradation would have been mitigated. However, the upside production seen from the third well would not be attainable had the well been completed as an OHGP on an equivalent well trajectory. The results of the study also indicated that minimizing the drilling damage would be integral to the success of the OHGP completion in comparison to optimizing the completion placement in a CHFP. The paper addresses a significant issue of PI decline affecting deepwater wells and presents a potential remediation technique based on alternate completion types. The paper also presents a new methodology based on Design of Experiment to assess the contribution of various damage mechanism while incorporating the uncertainty around each based on available measurements.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估裸眼砾石充填完井对修复墨西哥湾深水油田套管井压裂充填完井产能下降的影响
这项工作的目的是评估改变完井类型对深水中新世储层产能下降的影响。到目前为止,这些类型的资产通常使用套管井FracPack (CHFP)完井作为设计的基础。墨西哥湾深水中新世油藏的油井在投产的头几年里,产能指数(PI)就出现了显著下降。裸眼砾石充填(OHGP)和裸眼FracPack (OHFP)完井类型被选为CHFP的潜在替代方案。建立了井、储层和地质力学耦合模型,以评估多种潜在损害因素对生产测井中观察到的流入动态的影响。该模型对六种损伤机制(蠕变、裂缝导流性、细粒运移、裂缝连通性、面外射孔贡献和钻/完井液损伤)对油井性能的影响进行概率加权评估。基于此权重,可以评估它们对替代完井类型的影响。之前的研究(Knobles et al. 2017)表明,套管井完井特别容易受到PI下降的影响。具体来说,当无支撑射孔隧道坍塌时,它们会减少流入井筒的面积,并产生流动限制。在高渗透率地层中,未与裂缝相连的射孔(即离面射孔)可以贡献很大一部分井的产量。需要注意的是,如果对射孔的连通性和充填进行了优化,并且将裂缝放置在设计规范范围内,则可以观察到很少的PI下降。然而,在现实世界中,情况并非总是如此。该分析使用了三口井。有两口井的产量下降,而第三口井的产量没有明显下降。研究结果表明,如果这两口表现不佳的井采用OHGP完井,PI的下降将得到缓解。然而,如果第三口井在相同的井眼轨迹上作为OHGP完成,则无法实现增产。研究结果还表明,与优化CHFP的完井位置相比,最大限度地减少钻井损害是OHGP完井成功的关键。本文讨论了影响深水井PI下降的重要问题,并提出了一种基于替代完井类型的潜在补救技术。本文还提出了一种基于实验设计的新方法来评估各种损伤机制的贡献,同时结合基于现有测量的每种机制的不确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Regulatory and sustainability initiatives lead to improved polyaminopolyamide epichlorohydrin (PAE) wet-strength resins and paper products Rewet in wet pressing of paper Mineral/microfibrillated cellulose composite materials: High performance products, applications, and product forms Challenges and Lessons Learned During Completion of Intelligent Multilateral Wells in Minagish Field, West Kuwait Asphaltene Studies in On-Shore Abu Dhabi Fields, Part IV: Development of a Surface Sensor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1