Indo-European Inroads into the Syntactic-Etymological Interface: A Reconstruction of the PIE verbal root *menkʷ- ‘to be short; to lack’ and its Argument Structure
{"title":"Indo-European Inroads into the Syntactic-Etymological Interface: A Reconstruction of the PIE verbal root *menkʷ- ‘to be short; to lack’ and its Argument Structure","authors":"M. Frotscher, G. Kroonen, Jóhanna Barðdal","doi":"10.13109/hisp.2020.133.1.62","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": In this article we report a previously unidentified verbal root for the Indo-European protolanguage, * menk ʷ - ‘to be short; to lack’, based on verbal and nominal reflexes in Italic, Indo-Iranian, Germanic, Tocharian and Anatolian, founded, we claim, in the Caland System , an archaic stratum of the Proto-Indo-European derivational system. In four of five Indo-European subgroups, predicates are found occurring with a subject(-like) argument in a non-nominative case, dative in the languages that have retained the Indo- European case morphology, but an oblique case in the branches where different non-nom-inative forms have merged. The documented verbal forms cannot be unified into a single reconstructable verb, yet we argue that the more abstract argument structure construction involving a dative subject(-like) argument must be inherited from Proto-Indo-European. Hence, we suggest a partial reconstruction for the grammar of Proto-Indo-European, based on the attested Tocharian form, * m(e)nk ʷ - MP , the non-nominative case of the sub- ject(-like) argument, and the meaning ‘lack’. Taken together, this cumulative evidence corroborates the assumption that a verb meaning ‘lack’ developed from ‘be short’ in the proto-language, indeed instantiating a non-canonically case-marked argument structure with its subject(-like) argument in the dative case.","PeriodicalId":42165,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Historical Linguistics","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Historical Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13109/hisp.2020.133.1.62","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
: In this article we report a previously unidentified verbal root for the Indo-European protolanguage, * menk ʷ - ‘to be short; to lack’, based on verbal and nominal reflexes in Italic, Indo-Iranian, Germanic, Tocharian and Anatolian, founded, we claim, in the Caland System , an archaic stratum of the Proto-Indo-European derivational system. In four of five Indo-European subgroups, predicates are found occurring with a subject(-like) argument in a non-nominative case, dative in the languages that have retained the Indo- European case morphology, but an oblique case in the branches where different non-nom-inative forms have merged. The documented verbal forms cannot be unified into a single reconstructable verb, yet we argue that the more abstract argument structure construction involving a dative subject(-like) argument must be inherited from Proto-Indo-European. Hence, we suggest a partial reconstruction for the grammar of Proto-Indo-European, based on the attested Tocharian form, * m(e)nk ʷ - MP , the non-nominative case of the sub- ject(-like) argument, and the meaning ‘lack’. Taken together, this cumulative evidence corroborates the assumption that a verb meaning ‘lack’ developed from ‘be short’ in the proto-language, indeed instantiating a non-canonically case-marked argument structure with its subject(-like) argument in the dative case.
印欧语对句法-词源界面的入侵:PIE词根*menk k - ' to be short的重构“to lack”及其论证结构
在这篇文章中,我们报道了一个以前未被发现的印欧语的词根,* menk k - '是缩写;根据意大利语、印度-伊朗语、日耳曼语、吐火罗语和安纳托利亚语的口头和名义反射,我们声称,在加兰系统中建立了原始印欧衍生系统的一个古老阶层。在五个印欧语系的四个分支中,谓语在非主格情况下出现主语(类)论证,在保留了印欧格形态的语言中出现加格,但在不同的非主格形式合并的分支中出现斜格。文献记载的动词形式不能统一为一个可重构的动词,但我们认为,涉及与格主语(类)论点的更抽象的论点结构结构必须继承自原始印欧语。因此,我们建议对原始印欧语的语法进行部分重建,基于已证实的火罗语形式,* m(e)nk k - MP,主(类)论点的非主格,以及“缺乏”的意思。综上所述,这些累积的证据证实了这样的假设,即一个意为“缺乏”的动词是从原始语言中的“短”发展而来的,它确实实例化了一个非规范的格标记的参数结构,其主语(类似)参数在与格格中。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Historical Linguistics aims to publish, after peer-review, papers that make a significant contribution to the theory and/or methodology of historical linguistics. Papers dealing with any language or language family are welcome. Papers should have a diachronic orientation and should offer new perspectives, refine existing methodologies, or challenge received wisdom, on the basis of careful analysis of extant historical data. We are especially keen to publish work which links historical linguistics to corpus-based research, linguistic typology, language variation, language contact, or the study of language and cognition, all of which constitute a major source of methodological renewal for the discipline and shed light on aspects of language change. Contributions in areas such as diachronic corpus linguistics or diachronic typology are therefore particularly welcome.