Understanding the "Difficult" Patient.

Q4 Medicine Narrative inquiry in bioethics Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1353/nib.2023.0016
Yolonda Wilson
{"title":"Understanding the \"Difficult\" Patient.","authors":"Yolonda Wilson","doi":"10.1353/nib.2023.0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>James Groves opens his 1978 foundational article, \"Taking Care of the Hateful Patient,\" thusly, \"Admitted or not, the fact remains that a few patients kindle aversion, fear, despair, or even downright malice in their doctors.\" Groves understood his article as pulling back the curtain on an experience that physicians had but that few dared discuss without shame. His taxonomy of four types of \"hateful\" patients: clingers, entitled demanders, manipulative help rejectors, and self-destructive deniers may still be instructive. However, the intervening years have revealed that this taxonomy does not adequately capture the nuances present when patients are described as \"difficult.\" This issue of Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics situates this complexity. Different kinds of providers in a variety of healthcare delivering institutions have offered accounts of their own interactions with so-called difficult patients. In each of these stories, the providers tell the reader how the providers were transformed through these interactions: what they learned about their patients, what they learned about patient care, what they could have done differently or better, and what lessons they have taken with them into subsequent encounters.</p>","PeriodicalId":37978,"journal":{"name":"Narrative inquiry in bioethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Narrative inquiry in bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/nib.2023.0016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

James Groves opens his 1978 foundational article, "Taking Care of the Hateful Patient," thusly, "Admitted or not, the fact remains that a few patients kindle aversion, fear, despair, or even downright malice in their doctors." Groves understood his article as pulling back the curtain on an experience that physicians had but that few dared discuss without shame. His taxonomy of four types of "hateful" patients: clingers, entitled demanders, manipulative help rejectors, and self-destructive deniers may still be instructive. However, the intervening years have revealed that this taxonomy does not adequately capture the nuances present when patients are described as "difficult." This issue of Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics situates this complexity. Different kinds of providers in a variety of healthcare delivering institutions have offered accounts of their own interactions with so-called difficult patients. In each of these stories, the providers tell the reader how the providers were transformed through these interactions: what they learned about their patients, what they learned about patient care, what they could have done differently or better, and what lessons they have taken with them into subsequent encounters.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解 "困难 "病人。
詹姆斯-格罗夫斯(James Groves)在 1978 年发表的奠基性文章《照顾可恨的病人》中这样开篇:"无论承认与否,事实依然是,少数病人会激起医生的厌恶、恐惧、绝望,甚至是彻头彻尾的恶意。格罗夫斯认为,他的这篇文章揭开了医生们都有的经历的帷幕,但很少有人敢于毫无羞耻地讨论这种经历。他对四种 "可恨 "病人的分类:依附者、有权要求者、操纵性拒绝帮助者和自我毁灭的否认者,也许仍然具有指导意义。然而,多年来的实践表明,这种分类法并不能充分捕捉到被描述为 "难缠 "病人的细微差别。本期的《生命伦理学叙事探究》就对这种复杂性进行了定位。各种医疗机构中不同类型的医疗服务提供者讲述了他们与所谓的 "疑难杂症 "患者之间的互动。在每个故事中,医疗服务提供者都向读者讲述了他们是如何通过这些互动发生转变的:他们从病人身上学到了什么,他们从病人护理中学到了什么,他们本可以采取什么不同的方式或更好的方式,以及他们在以后的接触中吸取了哪些经验教训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Narrative inquiry in bioethics
Narrative inquiry in bioethics Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics (NIB) is a unique journal that provides a forum for exploring current issues in bioethics through personal stories, qualitative and mixed-methods research articles, and case studies. NIB is dedicated to fostering a deeper understanding of bioethical issues by publishing rich descriptions of complex human experiences written in the words of the person experiencing them. While NIB upholds appropriate standards for narrative inquiry and qualitative research, it seeks to publish articles that will appeal to a broad readership of healthcare providers and researchers, bioethicists, sociologists, policy makers, and others. Articles may address the experiences of patients, family members, and health care workers.
期刊最新文献
Moral Inequity in Organ Donation: An Examination of Age-Based Denial Ethical Considerations of Unsedated Esophagogastroduodenoscopy in Pediatric Patients Difficult Discharge in the Context of Suspected Malingering: Reflections on the Value of Epistemic and Professional Independence “Do We Have to Tell Him He Hasn’t Been Getting Ativan?”: Truth Telling for a Patient with Nonepileptic Seizures Withdrawing Life Support After Attempted Suicide: A Case Study and Review of Ethical Consideration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1