A comparative study of external dacryocystorhinostomy and endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy

Dr. Manjula Mangane, Dr. Kundurthi Susmitha
{"title":"A comparative study of external dacryocystorhinostomy and endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy","authors":"Dr. Manjula Mangane, Dr. Kundurthi Susmitha","doi":"10.33545/26638266.2022.v4.i1a.110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Epiphora is an imperfect drainage of tears through the lacrimal passage. This is an annoying symptom, embarrassing both socially and functionally. The most common cause being chronic Dacryocystitis. The two widely accepted treatments are external and endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Objective: To compare the primary success rate of external DCR and endonasal endoscopic DCR. Methods: In a prospective randomized controlled study, 50 cases of lower lacrimal passage obstruction were divided into two groups of 25 each. These two groups were surgically treated as Group I-underwent External DCR and Group II –underwent endonasal endoscopic DCR after investigating and evaluation as per the predesigned proforma. Results: 50 cases (7 males, 43 females) of lower nasolacrimal passage obstruction admitted in Mahadevappa Rampure Medical College, Kalaburagi, were operated, 25 cases underwent external DCR and 25 cases underwent Endonasal Endoscopic DCR. The mean age of the patients was 41.98 years. The success was defined by anatomical patency by sac syringing. At the end of follow up of 3 months, the success rate in group I was 88% (23 cases) and in group II was 76% (19 cases). The average surgical duration required was 59.4 minutes in Group I and 41.8 minutes in group II. Conclusion: Both the procedures represent good alternative for the treatment of lower lacrimal passage obstruction.","PeriodicalId":14021,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33545/26638266.2022.v4.i1a.110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Epiphora is an imperfect drainage of tears through the lacrimal passage. This is an annoying symptom, embarrassing both socially and functionally. The most common cause being chronic Dacryocystitis. The two widely accepted treatments are external and endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Objective: To compare the primary success rate of external DCR and endonasal endoscopic DCR. Methods: In a prospective randomized controlled study, 50 cases of lower lacrimal passage obstruction were divided into two groups of 25 each. These two groups were surgically treated as Group I-underwent External DCR and Group II –underwent endonasal endoscopic DCR after investigating and evaluation as per the predesigned proforma. Results: 50 cases (7 males, 43 females) of lower nasolacrimal passage obstruction admitted in Mahadevappa Rampure Medical College, Kalaburagi, were operated, 25 cases underwent external DCR and 25 cases underwent Endonasal Endoscopic DCR. The mean age of the patients was 41.98 years. The success was defined by anatomical patency by sac syringing. At the end of follow up of 3 months, the success rate in group I was 88% (23 cases) and in group II was 76% (19 cases). The average surgical duration required was 59.4 minutes in Group I and 41.8 minutes in group II. Conclusion: Both the procedures represent good alternative for the treatment of lower lacrimal passage obstruction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
鼻内窥镜下泪囊鼻腔吻合术与外部泪囊鼻腔吻合术的比较研究
介绍:泪滴是泪道不完全的引流。这是一种令人讨厌的症状,在社交和功能上都令人尴尬。最常见的原因是慢性泪囊炎。两种被广泛接受的治疗方法是鼻内窥镜下泪囊鼻腔造瘘术。目的:比较鼻内窥镜下DCR与外部DCR的初次成功率。方法:采用前瞻性随机对照研究,将50例下泪道梗阻患者分为两组,每组25例。两组按预先设计的形式进行调查评估后,手术治疗为i组行外置DCR, II组行鼻内窥镜DCR。结果:我院收治下鼻泪道梗阻患者50例(男7例,女43例),其中行外置DCR 25例,鼻内窥镜DCR 25例。患者平均年龄41.98岁。成功的定义是解剖上囊腔的通畅。随访3个月时,ⅰ组23例,成功率88%;ⅱ组19例,成功率76%。ⅰ组平均手术时间59.4分钟,ⅱ组平均41.8分钟。结论:两种术式均为治疗下泪道梗阻的良好选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Multiple cranial nerve palsies with altitudinal hemianopsia following traumatic brain injury in remote area: A case report Corneal biomechanical changes following small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) with variable cap thickness in management of mild to moderate myopia Expert opinion on netarsudil for the management of glaucoma in Indian settings Outcome of macular hole surgery in a peripheral eye care facility of Nepal Assessment of binocular functions in intermittent exotropia before and after surgical correction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1