VI. Lutherische Konfessionsbildung. „Lutherische Orthodoxie“ aus rechtshistorischer Sicht

M. Schmoeckel
{"title":"VI. Lutherische Konfessionsbildung. „Lutherische Orthodoxie“ aus rechtshistorischer Sicht","authors":"M. Schmoeckel","doi":"10.1515/zrgk-2023-0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The development of the Lutheran Denomination. “Lutheran Orthodoxy” in the perspective of Legal History. The term ‘Lutheran Orthodoxy’ is mostly used for the majority of Lutherans following the ‘Formular of Concord’ of 1577. Originally, however, the term was coined with a polemic intention to reveal the hardhearted persecution of religious minorities. In a legal perspective it stands for a debate within Saxon Protestants, which starting in 1573 led to the incrimination of Calvinists as well as Philippists (followers of Philipp Melanchthon), but also established, eventually, the Lutheran denomination in the Empire and in other countries. When criminal persecution was no longer to be expected, this kind of debate was carried on among Lutheran lawyers in order to claim true Lutheranism for their own teaching. With Christian Thomasius, however, the repression itself became a reproach – which coins the common perception until today.","PeriodicalId":24010,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte: Kanonistische Abteilung","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte: Kanonistische Abteilung","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/zrgk-2023-0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The development of the Lutheran Denomination. “Lutheran Orthodoxy” in the perspective of Legal History. The term ‘Lutheran Orthodoxy’ is mostly used for the majority of Lutherans following the ‘Formular of Concord’ of 1577. Originally, however, the term was coined with a polemic intention to reveal the hardhearted persecution of religious minorities. In a legal perspective it stands for a debate within Saxon Protestants, which starting in 1573 led to the incrimination of Calvinists as well as Philippists (followers of Philipp Melanchthon), but also established, eventually, the Lutheran denomination in the Empire and in other countries. When criminal persecution was no longer to be expected, this kind of debate was carried on among Lutheran lawyers in order to claim true Lutheranism for their own teaching. With Christian Thomasius, however, the repression itself became a reproach – which coins the common perception until today.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
五。东正教在法律上的历史
路德教派的发展。法律史视角下的“路德正教”。“路德正教”一词主要用于大多数遵循1577年“康科德公式”的路德教徒。然而,这个词最初是为了揭露对宗教少数群体的残酷迫害而创造的。从法律的角度来看,它代表了撒克逊新教徒内部的一场辩论,这场辩论始于1573年,导致加尔文主义者和腓立比主义者(菲利普·梅兰希顿的追随者)被指控有罪,但最终也在帝国和其他国家建立了路德教派。当刑事迫害不再可能发生时,这种争论在路德教的律师中进行,以声称自己的教义是真正的路德教。然而,对于克里斯蒂安·托马修来说,镇压本身变成了一种指责——直到今天,这种看法仍然是普遍的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Leitung, Recht und Arbeit in der Kirche. Beiträge zur Geschichte und Gegenwart des evangelischen Kirchenrechts und des Religionsverfassungsrechts, Detlev W. Belling zu Ehren, hg. v. Christian Nottmeier/Martin Richter/Thorsten Ingo Schmidt (= Schriften zum Staatskirchenrecht 62) Martin Krutzler, Der Gewissenstäter im kanonischen Recht. Das kirchliche Sanktionsrecht im Lichte der Glaubens- und Gewissensfreiheit (= Kanonistische Studien und Texte 70) Acta Cusana, Quellen zur Lebensgeschichte des Nikolaus von Kues, Bd. III Lieferung 1: 1458 Oktober 1 bis 1459 Dezember 31, hg. von Johannes Helmrath/ Thomas Woelki David Scherf, Gesetz und Evangelium im Nachkriegsprotestantismus. Eine Untersuchung am Beispiel von Ernst Wolf, Helmut Thielicke und Carl Heinz Ratschow (= Religion in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland 5) Central Courts in Early Modern Europe and the Americas, hg. v. A.M. Godfrey/C.H. van Rhee (= Comparative Studies in Continental and Anglo-American Legal History 34)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1