{"title":"Dorett Elodie Werhahn-Piorkowski, Die Regule Cancellarie Innozenz’ VIII. und Alexanders VI.: Überlieferungsgeschichte, Inkunabelkatalog und Edition der päpstlichen Kanzleiregeln im frühen Buchdruck (= Monumenta Germaniae Historica, Schriften 76)","authors":"M. Schmoeckel","doi":"10.1515/zrgk-2023-0022","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/zrgk-2023-0022","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":24010,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte: Kanonistische Abteilung","volume":"98 1","pages":"302 - 303"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76130781","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Australian Jurists and Christianity, ed. Geoff Lindsay/Wayne Hudson with a forward by Bruce Kercher","authors":"Jason Taliadoros","doi":"10.1515/zrgk-2023-0017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/zrgk-2023-0017","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":24010,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte: Kanonistische Abteilung","volume":"32 1","pages":"282 - 286"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76576031","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Law and Christianity in Latin America. The Work of Great Jurists, hg. von M.C. Mirow/Rafael Domingo (= Law and Religion)","authors":"J. Sedano","doi":"10.1515/zrgk-2023-0016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/zrgk-2023-0016","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":24010,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte: Kanonistische Abteilung","volume":"270 1","pages":"279 - 282"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85192969","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Law and the Christian Tradition in Italy. The Legacy of the Great Jurists, ed. Orazio Condorelli/Rafael Domingo (= Law and Christianity)","authors":"Malte Becker","doi":"10.1515/zrgk-2023-0013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/zrgk-2023-0013","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":24010,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte: Kanonistische Abteilung","volume":"26 1","pages":"260 - 264"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78837489","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Markus Weskott, Gewissen und Gewissensfreiheit im neueren Protestantismus. Denkansätze von Thielicke bis Rendtorff (= Ethik – Grundlagen und Handlungsfelder 16)","authors":"Daniel Rossa","doi":"10.1515/zrgk-2023-0044","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/zrgk-2023-0044","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":24010,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte: Kanonistische Abteilung","volume":"8 1","pages":"389 - 392"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"91358128","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract The development of the Lutheran Denomination. “Lutheran Orthodoxy” in the perspective of Legal History. The term ‘Lutheran Orthodoxy’ is mostly used for the majority of Lutherans following the ‘Formular of Concord’ of 1577. Originally, however, the term was coined with a polemic intention to reveal the hardhearted persecution of religious minorities. In a legal perspective it stands for a debate within Saxon Protestants, which starting in 1573 led to the incrimination of Calvinists as well as Philippists (followers of Philipp Melanchthon), but also established, eventually, the Lutheran denomination in the Empire and in other countries. When criminal persecution was no longer to be expected, this kind of debate was carried on among Lutheran lawyers in order to claim true Lutheranism for their own teaching. With Christian Thomasius, however, the repression itself became a reproach – which coins the common perception until today.
{"title":"VI. Lutherische Konfessionsbildung. „Lutherische Orthodoxie“ aus rechtshistorischer Sicht","authors":"M. Schmoeckel","doi":"10.1515/zrgk-2023-0006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/zrgk-2023-0006","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The development of the Lutheran Denomination. “Lutheran Orthodoxy” in the perspective of Legal History. The term ‘Lutheran Orthodoxy’ is mostly used for the majority of Lutherans following the ‘Formular of Concord’ of 1577. Originally, however, the term was coined with a polemic intention to reveal the hardhearted persecution of religious minorities. In a legal perspective it stands for a debate within Saxon Protestants, which starting in 1573 led to the incrimination of Calvinists as well as Philippists (followers of Philipp Melanchthon), but also established, eventually, the Lutheran denomination in the Empire and in other countries. When criminal persecution was no longer to be expected, this kind of debate was carried on among Lutheran lawyers in order to claim true Lutheranism for their own teaching. With Christian Thomasius, however, the repression itself became a reproach – which coins the common perception until today.","PeriodicalId":24010,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte: Kanonistische Abteilung","volume":"51 1","pages":"158 - 197"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75589178","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Summary This paper questions the narrative widely used in historical research that from the time after the Fourth Lateran Council (1215), the canonical punishment of sodomy was tightened and sodomy was ultimately persecuted as heresy. Particular attention is paid to the ecclesiastical prosecution of heresy in the pontificate of Gregory IX in comparison to the treatment of the offence at the Lateran Councils of 1179 and 1215 as well as in the confession summa of Raymund of Peñafort. Due to the opposing presentations of the issue by Raymund and Gregory, this essay also contributes to the question of the relationship between the Pope and the compiler of the Liber Extra.
{"title":"IV. Ira Dei venit de coelo in filios diffidentiae. Zur Verbindung von Häresie und Sodomie aus kanonistischer Perspektive","authors":"Kevin Kulp","doi":"10.1515/zrgk-2023-0004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/zrgk-2023-0004","url":null,"abstract":"Summary This paper questions the narrative widely used in historical research that from the time after the Fourth Lateran Council (1215), the canonical punishment of sodomy was tightened and sodomy was ultimately persecuted as heresy. Particular attention is paid to the ecclesiastical prosecution of heresy in the pontificate of Gregory IX in comparison to the treatment of the offence at the Lateran Councils of 1179 and 1215 as well as in the confession summa of Raymund of Peñafort. Due to the opposing presentations of the issue by Raymund and Gregory, this essay also contributes to the question of the relationship between the Pope and the compiler of the Liber Extra.","PeriodicalId":24010,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte: Kanonistische Abteilung","volume":"19 1","pages":"106 - 131"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89124658","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Summary We trace the transmission and influence of a late-antique maxim, “Privilegium meretur amittere, qui potestate sibi concessa abutitur” [PMA] down to the early modern period. Appearing first in a decretal of Pope Simplicius, it spread not only through the canon law but also into a variety of other texts, for example theological and political treatises. PMA deserves attention alongside the more famous “Quod omnes tangit, ab omnibus approbetur” through its contribution to the idea of limited government.
我们追溯古今晚期的格言“Privilegium mermerere, qui potestate sibi concessa abutur”(PMA)的传播和影响，直至近代早期。它首先出现在教皇辛普利西乌斯的法令中，它不仅通过教会法传播，而且传播到其他各种文本中，例如神学和政治论文。PMA由于对有限政府理念的贡献，值得与更著名的“上帝是万能的，而不是万能的”(Quod omnes tangit, ab omnibus approber)一起受到关注。
{"title":"II. Power as Privilege: The Maxim Privilegium meretur amittere, qui potestate sibi concessa abutitur","authors":"Bruce C. Brasington","doi":"10.1515/zrgk-2023-0002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/zrgk-2023-0002","url":null,"abstract":"Summary We trace the transmission and influence of a late-antique maxim, “Privilegium meretur amittere, qui potestate sibi concessa abutitur” [PMA] down to the early modern period. Appearing first in a decretal of Pope Simplicius, it spread not only through the canon law but also into a variety of other texts, for example theological and political treatises. PMA deserves attention alongside the more famous “Quod omnes tangit, ab omnibus approbetur” through its contribution to the idea of limited government.","PeriodicalId":24010,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte: Kanonistische Abteilung","volume":"123 1","pages":"53 - 72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86430326","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract The Apparatus on the Decretals by pope Innocent IV: A known unknown. Other than the usual approach which focuses on the juridical content of the famous decretal commentary, the present paper highlights its structural and formal features. Peculiarities include unusual methods of argumentation, striking disproportions in the attention given to individual decretals, increasing frequency of gaps due to rudimentary treatment of certain decretals and complete omission of others, a program of textual criticism halfway abandoned, a rich tradition, where some 30 early editions, ca. 160 medieval manuscripts and a mysterious originale remain without apparent connections, a daunting jungle of so called additiones. The paper, which asks many questions leaving them without answers, should nevertheless help to understand the incomparable commentary.
{"title":"V. Der Dekretalenapparat Papst Innozenz’ IV. Ein bekannter Unbekannter","authors":"M. Bertram","doi":"10.1515/zrgk-2023-0005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/zrgk-2023-0005","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The Apparatus on the Decretals by pope Innocent IV: A known unknown. Other than the usual approach which focuses on the juridical content of the famous decretal commentary, the present paper highlights its structural and formal features. Peculiarities include unusual methods of argumentation, striking disproportions in the attention given to individual decretals, increasing frequency of gaps due to rudimentary treatment of certain decretals and complete omission of others, a program of textual criticism halfway abandoned, a rich tradition, where some 30 early editions, ca. 160 medieval manuscripts and a mysterious originale remain without apparent connections, a daunting jungle of so called additiones. The paper, which asks many questions leaving them without answers, should nevertheless help to understand the incomparable commentary.","PeriodicalId":24010,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte: Kanonistische Abteilung","volume":"273 1","pages":"132 - 157"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"91539209","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Summary In the present article, I analyze Greek and Latin sources of pre-Nicene Christianity and argue that violence, although generally overlooked, constitutes an intrinsic and significant aspect of the early Christian model of pastoral rule. I premise my argument on an understanding of violence that rejects so-called ‘legitimist’ definitions, which subordinate the judgment on violence to a judgment on legitimacy and reserve the label of violence for illegitimate actions alone. Congenitally embedded in a network of conflictual relations, the shepherd of early Christian imagery is primarily tasked with the salvation of the sheep from enemies whose ambiguous identity, I argue, often betrays their provenance from within the flock. The shepherd is also engaged in disciplining his animals through measures that include severe physical punishments and exclusion from the herd. To conclude, I argue that the pastoral metaphor is itself an especially powerful instrument in the discursive construction of legitimate violence. For a relevant strand of ancient thought, to frame a particular institution in terms of the shepherd-flock relationship is, I argue, to conceive of it as replicative of the natural and normative order of reality, while also making certain acts of violence appear as the preferable course of action to be sought in the government of the community.
{"title":"The Violent Shepherd: Constructing Legitimate Violence in Pre-Nicene Christianity","authors":"Francesco Rotiroti","doi":"10.1515/zrgk-2023-0001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/zrgk-2023-0001","url":null,"abstract":"Summary In the present article, I analyze Greek and Latin sources of pre-Nicene Christianity and argue that violence, although generally overlooked, constitutes an intrinsic and significant aspect of the early Christian model of pastoral rule. I premise my argument on an understanding of violence that rejects so-called ‘legitimist’ definitions, which subordinate the judgment on violence to a judgment on legitimacy and reserve the label of violence for illegitimate actions alone. Congenitally embedded in a network of conflictual relations, the shepherd of early Christian imagery is primarily tasked with the salvation of the sheep from enemies whose ambiguous identity, I argue, often betrays their provenance from within the flock. The shepherd is also engaged in disciplining his animals through measures that include severe physical punishments and exclusion from the herd. To conclude, I argue that the pastoral metaphor is itself an especially powerful instrument in the discursive construction of legitimate violence. For a relevant strand of ancient thought, to frame a particular institution in terms of the shepherd-flock relationship is, I argue, to conceive of it as replicative of the natural and normative order of reality, while also making certain acts of violence appear as the preferable course of action to be sought in the government of the community.","PeriodicalId":24010,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte: Kanonistische Abteilung","volume":"1 1","pages":"1 - 52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76982452","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：