{"title":"Fuerza e ironía en Christoph Menke","authors":"Horacio Tarragona, Naím Garnica","doi":"10.4067/S0718-71812016000200002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Christoph Menke sostiene que el sujeto estetico no tiene lugar en la tradicion del sujeto hegeliano-heideggeriano. El autor piensa que la subjetividad estetica no puede articularse, sin mas, con una metafisica del sujeto. El escrito reconstruye tales planteos para pensar mas alla del sujeto absoluto recurriendo a dos estrategias: retornar a los conceptos de fuerza de Baumgarten e ironia de Schlegel. Recuperar esas propuestas abre otro modo de comprender la modernidad y la subjetividad.","PeriodicalId":43414,"journal":{"name":"Aisthesis-Pratiche Linguaggi e Saperi dell Estetico","volume":"25 1","pages":"31-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aisthesis-Pratiche Linguaggi e Saperi dell Estetico","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-71812016000200002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Christoph Menke sostiene que el sujeto estetico no tiene lugar en la tradicion del sujeto hegeliano-heideggeriano. El autor piensa que la subjetividad estetica no puede articularse, sin mas, con una metafisica del sujeto. El escrito reconstruye tales planteos para pensar mas alla del sujeto absoluto recurriendo a dos estrategias: retornar a los conceptos de fuerza de Baumgarten e ironia de Schlegel. Recuperar esas propuestas abre otro modo de comprender la modernidad y la subjetividad.
期刊介绍：
The choice of the name of the journal represents a farewell from the identification of aesthetics with hermeneutics and speculative philosophy of art. It also shows our strong commitment to the irreducibility of aesthetics to a mere psychological fact. The subtitle of the journal “practices, languages and knowledge concerning aesthetics” indicates the present, fertile pluralism of aesthetics. This is a pluralism of views and methods, often connected with the different ways in which contemporary arts and aesthetic abilities present and structure themselves. Also, it is a pluralism of thoughts and formulas, which induces to relativize the western tradition within which the discipline of aesthetics was born. Finally, it is a pluralism of epistemic landscapes, which also trespasses into the sphere of sensibility and art. These various, epistemic landscapes have recently experienced a revolutionary enlargement through the rise of some new or radically renewed disciplines (from neurosciences to anthropology, from cognitive sciences to psychobiology). Indeed, we conceive Aisthesis as a public space where those different approaches and disciplines can interact.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
