Calculating a Land Carbon Accounting Factor in the United States: an Example and Implications

S. Prisley, Edie Sonne Hall
{"title":"Calculating a Land Carbon Accounting Factor in the United States: an Example and Implications","authors":"S. Prisley, Edie Sonne Hall","doi":"10.1093/jofore/fvad037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Companies that produce and use wood for products and energy find it increasingly important to communicate the carbon balance and potential climate effects of these activities. Computing forest carbon stocks and stock changes, and emissions from operations, are often part of institutional reporting for environmental, social, and governance purposes. This article describes an example methodology to assess forest carbon changes associated with the harvesting of wood products and proposes metrics that could be used to allocate harvesting effects to individual organizations for their reporting purposes. We discuss boundaries (types of forests and carbon pools to include), spatially appropriate evaluations given uncertainty, temporal considerations, risk of reversals, and allocation of net sequestration to products sourced from the region. We also discuss the complex nature of the biogenic carbon cycle and warn about the appropriate interpretation of this methodology. Study Implications: Purchasers of wood products are increasingly interested in the carbon effects of the wood they purchase. For example, are the forests from which this wood was harvested continuing to sequester carbon or are they in decline? One means of communicating this information would be a carbon accounting factor that expresses the net forest carbon change per unit of wood consumed. We describe an approach to develop such a factor and report results for regions of the conterminous United States. However, any single metric is unlikely to fully capture the carbon dynamics of wood sourcing, as illustrated by the carbon stock declines in the Rocky Mountain regions that cannot be attributed to forest harvesting or the very high factors for the Great Plains due to low harvest levels. We discuss several other metrics that can shed additional light on land carbon resiliency and land-use efficiency and could be considered in conjunction with net carbon stock change.","PeriodicalId":23386,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Forestry","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Forestry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jofore/fvad037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Companies that produce and use wood for products and energy find it increasingly important to communicate the carbon balance and potential climate effects of these activities. Computing forest carbon stocks and stock changes, and emissions from operations, are often part of institutional reporting for environmental, social, and governance purposes. This article describes an example methodology to assess forest carbon changes associated with the harvesting of wood products and proposes metrics that could be used to allocate harvesting effects to individual organizations for their reporting purposes. We discuss boundaries (types of forests and carbon pools to include), spatially appropriate evaluations given uncertainty, temporal considerations, risk of reversals, and allocation of net sequestration to products sourced from the region. We also discuss the complex nature of the biogenic carbon cycle and warn about the appropriate interpretation of this methodology. Study Implications: Purchasers of wood products are increasingly interested in the carbon effects of the wood they purchase. For example, are the forests from which this wood was harvested continuing to sequester carbon or are they in decline? One means of communicating this information would be a carbon accounting factor that expresses the net forest carbon change per unit of wood consumed. We describe an approach to develop such a factor and report results for regions of the conterminous United States. However, any single metric is unlikely to fully capture the carbon dynamics of wood sourcing, as illustrated by the carbon stock declines in the Rocky Mountain regions that cannot be attributed to forest harvesting or the very high factors for the Great Plains due to low harvest levels. We discuss several other metrics that can shed additional light on land carbon resiliency and land-use efficiency and could be considered in conjunction with net carbon stock change.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国土地碳核算因子的计算:一个例子及其启示
生产和使用木材作为产品和能源的公司发现,传达这些活动的碳平衡和潜在的气候影响变得越来越重要。计算森林碳储量和储量变化以及经营活动产生的排放,往往是机构报告的一部分,用于环境、社会和治理目的。本文描述了一个评估与木材产品采伐相关的森林碳变化的示例方法,并提出了可用于将采伐效果分配给各个组织以供其报告的指标。我们讨论了边界(包括森林类型和碳库)、考虑不确定性的空间适宜评估、时间考虑、逆转风险以及净固存分配给来自该地区的产品。我们还讨论了生物碳循环的复杂性质,并警告了这种方法的适当解释。研究启示:木制品购买者对他们购买的木材的碳效应越来越感兴趣。例如,砍伐这些木材的森林是在继续吸收碳还是在减少?传达这一信息的一种手段是碳核算因子,它表示每单位消耗的木材的净森林碳变化。我们描述了一种开发这种因素的方法,并报告了美国邻近地区的结果。然而,任何单一指标都不太可能完全捕捉到木材来源的碳动态,如落基山脉地区碳储量的下降所表明的那样,这不能归因于森林采伐或大平原地区由于采伐水平低而导致的非常高的因素。我们还讨论了其他几个指标,这些指标可以进一步阐明土地碳弹性和土地利用效率,并可以与净碳储量变化一起考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Batı Karadeniz Bölgesi Kazdağı göknarı ormanlarında göknar ökseotu bulunma ve bulaşma durumu: Kökez Orman İşletme Şefliği örneği Hitit metinlerinde orman Almus yöresi doğal doğu kayını meşcerelerinin çap dağılımının Weibull dağılımı ile modellenmesi Türkiye’nin kuzeybatısındaki bir plantasyonda yerli ve egzotik çam türlerinin ibrelerinde görülen fungal endofitler Assessing Mid-rotation Loblolly Pine and Competing Vegetation Responses to Post-thin Fertilization and Herbicide Application in the Southeastern United States
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1