Patterns in Receiving Informal Help with Childcare Among US Parents During the COVID-19 Pandemic

E. Zang, Yining Yang, J. Calarco
{"title":"Patterns in Receiving Informal Help with Childcare Among US Parents During the COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"E. Zang, Yining Yang, J. Calarco","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4108245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pandemic-related school and childcare closures have increased the demand for informal (i.e., unregulated or unpaid) childcare, including care from nannies, tutors, extended family members, siblings, friends, neighbors, and pandemic pods. Drawing on a novel survey of more than 2,000 U.S. parents, we are the first to examine U.S. parents’ use of informal support with childcare and/or remote learning. We found that between February and December 2020, approximately 60 percent of US parents received informal support with childcare, mostly from older children and extended family members. The types of informal care that parents used, however, differed along social class and racial/ethnic lines and did so in ways that were different from the pre-pandemic patterns. Further analyses also revealed that, among mothers who lost or left jobs during the pandemic, those who received informal support with childcare were working significantly more hours for pay in December 2020. We discuss the implications of these patterns for maternal employment as well as for the grandparents and the teens who played a critical role in helping parents with informal care during the pandemic.","PeriodicalId":21855,"journal":{"name":"SSRN Electronic Journal","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSRN Electronic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4108245","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Pandemic-related school and childcare closures have increased the demand for informal (i.e., unregulated or unpaid) childcare, including care from nannies, tutors, extended family members, siblings, friends, neighbors, and pandemic pods. Drawing on a novel survey of more than 2,000 U.S. parents, we are the first to examine U.S. parents’ use of informal support with childcare and/or remote learning. We found that between February and December 2020, approximately 60 percent of US parents received informal support with childcare, mostly from older children and extended family members. The types of informal care that parents used, however, differed along social class and racial/ethnic lines and did so in ways that were different from the pre-pandemic patterns. Further analyses also revealed that, among mothers who lost or left jobs during the pandemic, those who received informal support with childcare were working significantly more hours for pay in December 2020. We discuss the implications of these patterns for maternal employment as well as for the grandparents and the teens who played a critical role in helping parents with informal care during the pandemic.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在COVID-19大流行期间,美国父母在儿童保育方面获得非正式帮助的模式
与大流行相关的学校和儿童保育关闭增加了对非正规(即不受管制或无偿)儿童保育的需求,包括保姆、家庭教师、大家庭成员、兄弟姐妹、朋友、邻居和流行病隔离区的照顾。根据一项对2000多名美国父母的新调查,我们首次调查了美国父母在儿童保育和/或远程学习方面使用非正式支持的情况。我们发现,在2020年2月至12月期间,大约60%的美国父母在育儿方面得到了非正式的支持,主要来自年龄较大的孩子和大家庭成员。然而,父母使用的非正式照料类型因社会阶层和种族/族裔而异,其方式与大流行前的模式不同。进一步的分析还显示,在大流行期间失业或离职的母亲中,那些在托儿方面获得非正式支持的母亲在2020年12月的带薪工作时间要长得多。我们讨论了这些模式对产妇就业的影响,以及对在大流行期间帮助父母提供非正式照顾方面发挥关键作用的祖父母和青少年的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bailing out the Protester Ships of State and Empty Vessels: Critical Reflections on 'Territorial Status in International Law' Religious Expression and Exemptions in the Private Sector Workplace: Spotting Bias Reform, Not Revolution, is What is Needed Now for Yardstick Competition Influence of Psychological Exchange Rates (PER) on Forex Price Formation: Theory, Empirical, and Experimental Evidence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1