Tractate on Critical Theory and Praxis: Implications for Professionalizing Music Education

Thomas A. Regelski, Theodor Wiesengrund Adorno, H. Marcuse, E. Fromm.
{"title":"Tractate on Critical Theory and Praxis: Implications for Professionalizing Music Education","authors":"Thomas A. Regelski, Theodor Wiesengrund Adorno, H. Marcuse, E. Fromm.","doi":"10.22176/act19.1.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Tractate was written following the first meeting of leading music education scholars in Buffalo. It was not, however intended as a scholarly essay. Rather, it was a declaration of assorted, numerous issues the next few meetings of founding MayDay Group members could engage with in organizing efforts at creating an organization predicated on critical communication about changing the status quo of the time. It is thus a historical document that, at the time of its writing, was an unpolished voice of one young (50ish) thinker. It has since slept largely unremarked in the MayDay Group website pages until noticed by Vince Bates. Its references to Critical Theory were posed as bases for the MayDay Group’s critical agenda. Some readers might detect its spirit in the subsequent MDG ethos of “action for change,” with “action” translated as “praxis.” Others might prefer to note a straying from the path implored by this document. Leaders attending to the present and future directions of the Group might take new resolve from it. The document was written with a critique in mind of mid-1990s music education. Sadly, much remains to be done. Perhaps a new foundational document (or several) for the next 30 years is in order to help organize future MayDay efforts of “action for change.” Until its recent reemergence I hadn’t known how much the Tractate foretold of my forthcoming new book on curriculum philosophy and theory, which takes up foundational issues first raised in this Tractate. I hope its current and future relevance are clear, even when it wanders more than a little.","PeriodicalId":29990,"journal":{"name":"Action Criticism and Theory for Music Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Action Criticism and Theory for Music Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22176/act19.1.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The Tractate was written following the first meeting of leading music education scholars in Buffalo. It was not, however intended as a scholarly essay. Rather, it was a declaration of assorted, numerous issues the next few meetings of founding MayDay Group members could engage with in organizing efforts at creating an organization predicated on critical communication about changing the status quo of the time. It is thus a historical document that, at the time of its writing, was an unpolished voice of one young (50ish) thinker. It has since slept largely unremarked in the MayDay Group website pages until noticed by Vince Bates. Its references to Critical Theory were posed as bases for the MayDay Group’s critical agenda. Some readers might detect its spirit in the subsequent MDG ethos of “action for change,” with “action” translated as “praxis.” Others might prefer to note a straying from the path implored by this document. Leaders attending to the present and future directions of the Group might take new resolve from it. The document was written with a critique in mind of mid-1990s music education. Sadly, much remains to be done. Perhaps a new foundational document (or several) for the next 30 years is in order to help organize future MayDay efforts of “action for change.” Until its recent reemergence I hadn’t known how much the Tractate foretold of my forthcoming new book on curriculum philosophy and theory, which takes up foundational issues first raised in this Tractate. I hope its current and future relevance are clear, even when it wanders more than a little.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
批判理论与实践:音乐教育专业化的启示
这本小册子是在布法罗的主要音乐教育学者第一次会议之后写的。然而,这并不是一篇学术论文。更确切地说,它是一份混杂的、众多问题的宣言,五月天集团创始成员在接下来的几次会议上可以参与组织努力,创建一个以改变时代现状的关键沟通为基础的组织。因此,这是一份历史文件,在其写作时,是一位年轻(50多岁)思想家未经修饰的声音。此后,它在五月天集团(MayDay Group)的网站页面上基本上没有被注意到,直到文斯·贝茨(Vince Bates)注意到。它对批判理论的引用被当作五月天乐队批判议程的基础。一些读者可能会在随后的千年发展目标“以行动改变”的精神中发现它的精神,“行动”被翻译成“实践”。其他人可能更愿意注意到这偏离了本文件所要求的道路。关注该小组目前和未来方向的领导人可能从中获得新的决心。该文件是对90年代中期音乐教育的批判。遗憾的是,还有很多工作要做。也许一个新的(或几个)未来30年的基础性文件是为了帮助组织未来五月天“行动起来改变”的努力。直到它最近重新出现,我才知道这本小册子对我即将出版的关于课程哲学和理论的新书有多大的预示,这本书讨论了这本小册子中首先提出的基本问题。我希望它的当前和未来的相关性是明确的,即使它偏离了一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊最新文献
Playing Upon the Blue Guitar: Toward Re-imaginings of the U.S. National Anthems Wherein Apocalypse: The Time Being in Music Education Empowering Asian Educators in the Time of Crisis Disabled and Racialized Musicians: Experiences and Epistemologies Assimilation and Integration in Classical Music Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1