Ureteroscopy under conscious sedation: A proof-of-concept study.

Kunal Jain, Ruben Blachman-Braun, Esha Jain, Amanda Eng, Brian Peters, Premal Patel
{"title":"Ureteroscopy under conscious sedation: A proof-of-concept study.","authors":"Kunal Jain, Ruben Blachman-Braun, Esha Jain, Amanda Eng, Brian Peters, Premal Patel","doi":"10.5489/cuaj.7750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Ureteroscopy (URS) is commonly performed under general anesthesia (GA) to maximize patient tolerability and minimize surgical complications; however, given the improvements in endoscopic technology and risks associated with GA, alternate forms of anesthesia have been postulated. We aimed to evaluate the outcomes of URS under conscious sedation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We completed a retrospective cohort study from November 2019 to June 2020 at a tertiary-level hospital. All URSs that were performed under urologist-directed conscious sedation were included. Our primary outcome was the ability to complete URS, defined as success rate. Secondary outcomes included: stone-free rate, intraoperative complication rate, hospital admission rate, and sedation requirement. Univariate- and multivariate-adjusted logistic regression analyses were employed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-nine URSs were included. Most (73/99, 73.7%) were performed for urolithiasis. The overall success rate was 83.8% (83/99), with 81.0% (34/42) intra-renal and 70.0% (16/23) proximal ureter success rates. The stone-free rate was 80.8% (59/73). No intraoperative complications nor hospital admissions were reported. The mean amount of sedation required was 3 mg (interquartile range [IQR] 2-4] of midazolam and 100 μg (100-150) of fentanyl. On multivariate analysis, midazolam was significantly associated with increased success (odds ratio 2.496, 95% confidence interval 1.057-5.892, p=0.037).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We have shown that proximal and intrarenal URS under conscious sedation is safe and effective. We were limited by our lack of followup, small sample size, selection bias to chose healthy patients, and lack of patient tolerability data. Patients and healthcare systems may benefit from implementing this innovation more broadly.</p>","PeriodicalId":61751,"journal":{"name":"国际生物医学工程杂志","volume":"41 1","pages":"E461-E467"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9484746/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"国际生物医学工程杂志","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.7750","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Ureteroscopy (URS) is commonly performed under general anesthesia (GA) to maximize patient tolerability and minimize surgical complications; however, given the improvements in endoscopic technology and risks associated with GA, alternate forms of anesthesia have been postulated. We aimed to evaluate the outcomes of URS under conscious sedation.

Methods: We completed a retrospective cohort study from November 2019 to June 2020 at a tertiary-level hospital. All URSs that were performed under urologist-directed conscious sedation were included. Our primary outcome was the ability to complete URS, defined as success rate. Secondary outcomes included: stone-free rate, intraoperative complication rate, hospital admission rate, and sedation requirement. Univariate- and multivariate-adjusted logistic regression analyses were employed.

Results: Ninety-nine URSs were included. Most (73/99, 73.7%) were performed for urolithiasis. The overall success rate was 83.8% (83/99), with 81.0% (34/42) intra-renal and 70.0% (16/23) proximal ureter success rates. The stone-free rate was 80.8% (59/73). No intraoperative complications nor hospital admissions were reported. The mean amount of sedation required was 3 mg (interquartile range [IQR] 2-4] of midazolam and 100 μg (100-150) of fentanyl. On multivariate analysis, midazolam was significantly associated with increased success (odds ratio 2.496, 95% confidence interval 1.057-5.892, p=0.037).

Conclusions: We have shown that proximal and intrarenal URS under conscious sedation is safe and effective. We were limited by our lack of followup, small sample size, selection bias to chose healthy patients, and lack of patient tolerability data. Patients and healthcare systems may benefit from implementing this innovation more broadly.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有意识镇静下的输尿管镜检查:概念验证研究
导言:输尿管镜检查(URS)通常在全身麻醉(GA)下进行,以最大限度地提高患者的耐受性和减少手术并发症;然而,鉴于内窥镜技术的改进和与GA相关的风险,人们提出了其他麻醉方式。我们的目的是评估在清醒镇静状态下进行 URS 的效果:我们于 2019 年 11 月至 2020 年 6 月在一家三级医院完成了一项回顾性队列研究。纳入了所有在泌尿科医师指导下有意识镇静的 URS。我们的主要结果是完成 URS 的能力,即成功率。次要结果包括:无结石率、术中并发症发生率、入院率和镇静要求。我们采用了单变量和多变量调整逻辑回归分析:结果:共纳入 99 例 URS。大多数(73/99,73.7%)手术是针对尿路结石进行的。总成功率为 83.8%(83/99),其中肾内成功率为 81.0%(34/42),近端输尿管成功率为 70.0%(16/23)。无结石率为 80.8%(59/73)。无术中并发症或住院病例报告。所需的平均镇静剂量为3毫克(四分位数间距 [IQR] 2-4])咪达唑仑和100微克(100-150)芬太尼。多变量分析显示,咪达唑仑与成功率的提高有显著相关性(几率比2.496,95%置信区间1.057-5.892,P=0.037):我们已经证明,在清醒镇静状态下进行近端和肾内 URS 是安全有效的。由于缺乏随访、样本量小、选择健康患者的偏差以及缺乏患者耐受性数据,我们的研究受到了限制。如果能更广泛地实施这一创新,患者和医疗系统都将从中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1974
期刊最新文献
Ureteroscopy under conscious sedation: A proof-of-concept study. A Study on Assessment of Depression, Anxiety and Stress among South Indian Population During the COVID-19 Pandemic Study on Antiviral Activities of Glycyrrhizin Improving Clinical Teaching of Fourth Year Anaesthesia Students: The Case of Wolaita Sodo University Hearing Aids of the Future: A Simulation Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1