Extension of a fixed-term employment contract: some theoretical and practical issues

IF 0.9 3区 社会学 Q2 LAW Journal of Legal Studies Pub Date : 2019-07-16 DOI:10.12737/2500-333x-2019-4-2-65-72
S. Kichigin
{"title":"Extension of a fixed-term employment contract: some theoretical and practical issues","authors":"S. Kichigin","doi":"10.12737/2500-333x-2019-4-2-65-72","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The problem of introducing changes to a fixed-term employment contract in terms of amending (extending) its term is an urgent applied problem in the work of personnel services, which often arises in the course of their practical work. Argued, based on established judicial practice, the solution to this problem will create clarity in the application of the norms of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation. \nThe norms of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation do not contain a ban on the application of the provisions of art. 72 of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation. However, to date there is no single, reasoned opinion on whether it is possible to change the term of a fixed-term employment contract, and if possible, under what conditions? On this issue, there are polar opinions. Both the courts and state authorities have repeatedly changed their position on this issue, right up to the diametrically opposite. \nIn this paper, the author attempts to answer this question on the basis of the existing judicial practice and the courts understand the relevant provisions of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation, the opinions of the federal authorities of the Russian Federation, as well as their own attempts to interpret the provisions of the law, and concludes that the term of a fixed-term labor contract in the presence of compliance with the necessary conditions dictated by the norms of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation, established law enforcement practice.","PeriodicalId":47756,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Legal Studies","volume":"109 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Legal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12737/2500-333x-2019-4-2-65-72","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The problem of introducing changes to a fixed-term employment contract in terms of amending (extending) its term is an urgent applied problem in the work of personnel services, which often arises in the course of their practical work. Argued, based on established judicial practice, the solution to this problem will create clarity in the application of the norms of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation. The norms of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation do not contain a ban on the application of the provisions of art. 72 of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation. However, to date there is no single, reasoned opinion on whether it is possible to change the term of a fixed-term employment contract, and if possible, under what conditions? On this issue, there are polar opinions. Both the courts and state authorities have repeatedly changed their position on this issue, right up to the diametrically opposite. In this paper, the author attempts to answer this question on the basis of the existing judicial practice and the courts understand the relevant provisions of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation, the opinions of the federal authorities of the Russian Federation, as well as their own attempts to interpret the provisions of the law, and concludes that the term of a fixed-term labor contract in the presence of compliance with the necessary conditions dictated by the norms of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation, established law enforcement practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
固定期限劳动合同的延长:若干理论与实践问题
对固定期限劳动合同进行修改(延长)期限的问题,是人事工作中一个迫切需要解决的问题,也是人事工作在实际工作中经常遇到的问题。他认为,根据既定的司法惯例,解决这一问题将使俄罗斯联邦《劳动法》规范的适用更加明确。俄罗斯联邦《劳动法》的规范没有禁止适用第3条的规定。《俄罗斯联邦劳动法》第72条。然而,到目前为止,对于是否可以改变固定期限劳动合同的期限,以及如果可以的话,在什么条件下,还没有一个单一的、合理的意见。在这个问题上,有截然不同的意见。法院和州当局在这个问题上一再改变立场,直到完全相反。在本文中,笔者试图根据现有的司法实践和法院对俄罗斯联邦劳动法相关条款的理解,俄罗斯联邦联邦当局的意见,以及自己对法律条款的解释,来回答这个问题。并得出结论认为,定期劳动合同的期限在符合俄罗斯联邦《劳动法》规范规定的必要条件的情况下,是既定的执法惯例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Legal Studies is a journal of interdisciplinary academic research into law and legal institutions. It emphasizes social science approaches, especially those of economics, political science, and psychology, but it also publishes the work of historians, philosophers, and others who are interested in legal theory. The JLS was founded in 1972.
期刊最新文献
Forensic Science Integration in Legal Education: A Paradigm Shift for Strengthening Legal Expertise in Pakistan QUO Quadis Romanian Education? Brief Introspection Tax Evasion Between Tax Optimization at the Border of Legality, Tax Burden and Voluntary Compliance Genesis of Legal Regulation of Pre-Trial Detention in Sweden and Ukraine: Comparative Analysis Oligarchic Politics in the Context of a Democratic Rule of Law in Relation to the Principle of Expediency
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1