Efficacy and Safety of Dexamethasone versus Fentanyl as an adjuvant with Bupivacaine and Lignocaine in Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block

S. Hasan, A. Chowdhury, S. Khatoon, Kalyan Barua, A. S. Alam
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Dexamethasone versus Fentanyl as an adjuvant with Bupivacaine and Lignocaine in Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block","authors":"S. Hasan, A. Chowdhury, S. Khatoon, Kalyan Barua, A. S. Alam","doi":"10.3329/jbsa.v32i1.66547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Brachial plexus blockade is gaining popularity day by day for the upper extremity surgery.Increasing the duration of local anesthetic action by adding different adjuvant is often desirable toprolong the surgical anesthesia and analgesia. The aim of this study was to make a comparative evaluationof the efficacy and safety of dexamethasone and fentanyl as an adjuvant with bupivacaine-lignocaine insupraclavicular block.\nMaterial and methods: This comparative study was carried out in the departmentof anesthesiology in Chittagong Medical College Hospital in collaboration with the department oforthopedic surgery over a period of 22months starting from July, 2012 to April, 2014. A total 130 adultpatients of either sex with American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) health status I-II were selected forupper limb surgery under supraclavicular brachial plexus block was randomly allocated in to two groupsof 65 patients in each. Group- D was received dexamethasone 2ml (10mg) and Group-F was receivedfentanyl 2ml (100mg) in 38ml of bupivacaine and lignocaine with adrenaline (total volume of 40ml).\nResult: The mean onset of sensory&motor block was 7.72±1.949min & 8.75±2.008min in group-D and7.60±3.711min & 9.23±5.114min in group-F. Both the results in two group was not statistically significant(p>0.05).The duration of analgesia in group-D was 11.40±0.844hrs and in group-F was 8.62±1.747hrs.Theresults was significantly higher in group-D than group-F (p<0.05).\nConclusion: There was significantlyprolonged duration of analgesia and better onset of sensory and motor block in dexamethasone groupthan in fentanyl group without any unwanted effects.\nJBSA 2019; 32(1): 10-17","PeriodicalId":17242,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Bangladesh Society of Anaesthesiologists","volume":"226 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Bangladesh Society of Anaesthesiologists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/jbsa.v32i1.66547","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Brachial plexus blockade is gaining popularity day by day for the upper extremity surgery.Increasing the duration of local anesthetic action by adding different adjuvant is often desirable toprolong the surgical anesthesia and analgesia. The aim of this study was to make a comparative evaluationof the efficacy and safety of dexamethasone and fentanyl as an adjuvant with bupivacaine-lignocaine insupraclavicular block. Material and methods: This comparative study was carried out in the departmentof anesthesiology in Chittagong Medical College Hospital in collaboration with the department oforthopedic surgery over a period of 22months starting from July, 2012 to April, 2014. A total 130 adultpatients of either sex with American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) health status I-II were selected forupper limb surgery under supraclavicular brachial plexus block was randomly allocated in to two groupsof 65 patients in each. Group- D was received dexamethasone 2ml (10mg) and Group-F was receivedfentanyl 2ml (100mg) in 38ml of bupivacaine and lignocaine with adrenaline (total volume of 40ml). Result: The mean onset of sensory&motor block was 7.72±1.949min & 8.75±2.008min in group-D and7.60±3.711min & 9.23±5.114min in group-F. Both the results in two group was not statistically significant(p>0.05).The duration of analgesia in group-D was 11.40±0.844hrs and in group-F was 8.62±1.747hrs.Theresults was significantly higher in group-D than group-F (p<0.05). Conclusion: There was significantlyprolonged duration of analgesia and better onset of sensory and motor block in dexamethasone groupthan in fentanyl group without any unwanted effects. JBSA 2019; 32(1): 10-17
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地塞米松与芬太尼联合布比卡因和利多卡因治疗锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞的疗效和安全性比较
背景:臂丛阻滞术在上肢手术中的应用日益广泛。为了延长手术麻醉和镇痛时间,通常需要添加不同的佐剂来延长局麻作用时间。本研究的目的是比较评价地塞米松和芬太尼作为辅助治疗布比卡因-利多卡因锁骨上阻滞的有效性和安全性。材料与方法:本比较研究于2012年7月至2014年4月在吉大港医学院附属医院麻醉科与骨科合作进行,为期22个月。选择健康状况为美国麻醉学会(ASA) I-II级的成人患者130例,随机分为两组,每组65例。D组给予地塞米松2ml (10mg), f组给予芬太尼2ml (100mg),加入布比卡因、利多卡因加肾上腺素38ml(总容积40ml)。结果:d组感觉运动阻滞平均发作时间分别为7.72±1.949min和8.75±2.008min, f组为7.60±3.711min和9.23±5.114min。两组比较差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。d组镇痛时间为11.40±0.844hrs, f组镇痛时间为8.62±1.747hrs。d组显著高于f组(p<0.05)。结论:与芬太尼组相比,地塞米松组镇痛时间明显延长,感觉和运动阻滞发生明显改善,且无不良反应。JBSA 2019;(1): 32 - 17
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Premedication of Oral Clonidine 2mcg/kg and 4mcg/kg for Analgesic and Pressure Response During First Twenty-four Hours After Upper Abdominal Surgery: A Comparative Study Comparison between effects of Clonazepam and Dexmedetomidine as sedative in elective Caesarean section under Subarachnoid anaesthesia A Dose Response Study Of Oral clonidine as premedication in patients undergoing abdominal gynaecological surgery Blood Glucose Variability as a Predictor of Mortality for Septic Patients in Intensive Care Unit Postoperative pain relief in pediatric surgery patients: Effect of intravenous paracetamol in comparison with diclofenac suppository
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1