Blood Glucose Variability as a Predictor of Mortality for Septic Patients in Intensive Care Unit

S. Akter, Suraya Akter, Md Zunaid, Taneem Mohammad, M. Rahman, Mohammad Abdul Hai Mia, Mozaffer Hossain, Md. Abdur Rahman
{"title":"Blood Glucose Variability as a Predictor of Mortality for Septic Patients in Intensive Care Unit","authors":"S. Akter, Suraya Akter, Md Zunaid, Taneem Mohammad, M. Rahman, Mohammad Abdul Hai Mia, Mozaffer Hossain, Md. Abdur Rahman","doi":"10.3329/jbsa.v35i2.67895","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: One of the ways of modulation of septic response is glycaemic control. Increased Bloodglucose variability rather than mean glucose level in critically ill patients is an important factorassociated with sepsis.\nObjective: Objective of this study was to find out whether the increased blood glucose variabilitypredicts mortality for septic patients in Intensive Care Unit.\nMethods: Purposively allocated 40 septic patients in Intensive Care Unit of Dhaka Medical CollegeHospital, Bangladesh were observed prospectively from January 2012 to July 2013. Glucose variabilitywas assessed within first twenty four hours of recruitment of septic patients. By considering a targetblood glucose level (5 - 8 m mol/L), the assigned patients were separated into three groups (accordingto blood glucose variability). Group I (mild variable group) included those patients having less than twoblood glucose values not within the target blood glucose level. Group II (moderate variable group)included those patients having more than two to four blood glucose values not within the target range.Group III (more variable group) included those patients having more than four blood glucose values outof range of target glucose level. Chi- square test along with a p-value (< 0.05) was done to assess whichgroup of blood glucose variability best reflects the association of mortality. Logistic regression was usedto determine the odds ratio of ICU death in relation to blood glucose variability.\nResults: Out of all the septic patients, the more blood glucose variability group (37.5%) more reflectedthe blood glucose variability than the others. Using the Chi-square, it was found that a highlysignificant difference (x2-14.56, p-value 0.001) was existed between three blood glucose variabilitygroups with respect to mortality. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that more glucosevariability group had predicted higher mortality rate with a p- value of 0.007 and an odds ratio of 16.0.Result is significant. On the other hand, significant effect of moderate glucose variability group onmortality was not found with a p-value of 0.665 and an odds ratio of 0.667.\nConclusions: The septic patients having more blood glucose variability had predicted higher mortalityrate than that of moderate and less blood glucose variability in Intensive Care Unit. This observationindicates that blood glucose variability should be included as a future approach to glucose managementof septic patients as a target for therapeutic intervention.\nJBSA 2022; 35 (2) : 43-50","PeriodicalId":17242,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Bangladesh Society of Anaesthesiologists","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Bangladesh Society of Anaesthesiologists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/jbsa.v35i2.67895","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: One of the ways of modulation of septic response is glycaemic control. Increased Bloodglucose variability rather than mean glucose level in critically ill patients is an important factorassociated with sepsis. Objective: Objective of this study was to find out whether the increased blood glucose variabilitypredicts mortality for septic patients in Intensive Care Unit. Methods: Purposively allocated 40 septic patients in Intensive Care Unit of Dhaka Medical CollegeHospital, Bangladesh were observed prospectively from January 2012 to July 2013. Glucose variabilitywas assessed within first twenty four hours of recruitment of septic patients. By considering a targetblood glucose level (5 - 8 m mol/L), the assigned patients were separated into three groups (accordingto blood glucose variability). Group I (mild variable group) included those patients having less than twoblood glucose values not within the target blood glucose level. Group II (moderate variable group)included those patients having more than two to four blood glucose values not within the target range.Group III (more variable group) included those patients having more than four blood glucose values outof range of target glucose level. Chi- square test along with a p-value (< 0.05) was done to assess whichgroup of blood glucose variability best reflects the association of mortality. Logistic regression was usedto determine the odds ratio of ICU death in relation to blood glucose variability. Results: Out of all the septic patients, the more blood glucose variability group (37.5%) more reflectedthe blood glucose variability than the others. Using the Chi-square, it was found that a highlysignificant difference (x2-14.56, p-value 0.001) was existed between three blood glucose variabilitygroups with respect to mortality. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that more glucosevariability group had predicted higher mortality rate with a p- value of 0.007 and an odds ratio of 16.0.Result is significant. On the other hand, significant effect of moderate glucose variability group onmortality was not found with a p-value of 0.665 and an odds ratio of 0.667. Conclusions: The septic patients having more blood glucose variability had predicted higher mortalityrate than that of moderate and less blood glucose variability in Intensive Care Unit. This observationindicates that blood glucose variability should be included as a future approach to glucose managementof septic patients as a target for therapeutic intervention. JBSA 2022; 35 (2) : 43-50
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
血糖变异性作为重症监护病房脓毒症患者死亡率的预测因子
背景:控制血糖是控制脓毒症反应的途径之一。危重患者血糖变异性升高而非平均血糖水平升高是脓毒症的重要相关因素。目的:本研究的目的是探讨重症监护室脓毒症患者血糖变异性升高是否能预测其死亡率。方法:对2012年1月至2013年7月在孟加拉国达卡医学院附属医院重症监护病房收治的40例脓毒症患者进行前瞻性观察。在招募脓毒症患者的前24小时内评估血糖变异性。通过考虑目标血糖水平(5 - 8 m mol/L),将指定的患者分为三组(根据血糖变异性)。第一组(轻度变量组)包括血糖值小于2且不在目标血糖水平范围内的患者。II组(中度变量组)包括血糖值超过2 - 4不在目标范围内的患者。第三组(更可变的组)包括那些血糖值超过目标血糖水平范围的患者。采用卡方检验和p值(< 0.05)来评估哪一组血糖变异性最能反映死亡率的相关性。采用Logistic回归确定ICU死亡与血糖变异性的比值比。结果:在所有脓毒症患者中,血糖变异性高组(37.5%)较其他组更能反映血糖变异性。使用卡方分析,我们发现三个血糖变异性组在死亡率方面存在高度显著差异(x2-14.56, p值0.001)。Logistic回归分析显示,血糖变异性越高的组预测死亡率越高,p值为0.007,优势比为16.0。结果显著。中度血糖变异性组对死亡率无显著影响,p值为0.665,优势比为0.667。结论:在重症监护病房,血糖变异性较大的脓毒症患者的死亡率高于血糖变异性中等和较低的脓毒症患者。这一观察结果表明,应将血糖变异性作为脓毒症患者血糖管理的未来方法,作为治疗干预的目标。JBSA 2022;35 (2): 43-50
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Premedication of Oral Clonidine 2mcg/kg and 4mcg/kg for Analgesic and Pressure Response During First Twenty-four Hours After Upper Abdominal Surgery: A Comparative Study Comparison between effects of Clonazepam and Dexmedetomidine as sedative in elective Caesarean section under Subarachnoid anaesthesia A Dose Response Study Of Oral clonidine as premedication in patients undergoing abdominal gynaecological surgery Blood Glucose Variability as a Predictor of Mortality for Septic Patients in Intensive Care Unit Postoperative pain relief in pediatric surgery patients: Effect of intravenous paracetamol in comparison with diclofenac suppository
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1