The Team Causes and Consequences of Team Membership Change: A Temporal Perspective

IF 14.3 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Academy of Management Annals Pub Date : 2021-05-06 DOI:10.5465/ANNALS.2019.0110
Jia Li, D. Knippenberg
{"title":"The Team Causes and Consequences of Team Membership Change: A Temporal Perspective","authors":"Jia Li, D. Knippenberg","doi":"10.5465/ANNALS.2019.0110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Teams are open dynamic systems with malleable membership. Depending on the specific attributes of new, incumbent, and departing members, membership change implies different changes in different aspects of team composition and structure and cannot be studied assuming all membership changes are created equal. We integrate evidence concerning team membership change in the management and psychology literatures and propose a theoretical framework to guide future research. The core mechanisms in the framework are: Membership change disrupts team cognitive, affective, motivational, and behavioral processes and states that require individual members’ actions and interactions to be developed and sustained and thereby jeopardize team performance at least in the short term. Yet, teams can adapt to membership change and recovers performance in the long term. To what extent teams experience the disruptive detriment and adaptive benefit will depend on (a) the magnitude of membership change, (b) the improvement or deterioration in team knowledge, skills, abilities, and other characteristics (KSAOs) and (c) task resources and social support inside and outside the team. Moreover, poor team performance and poor team experiences are the two main causes for team membership change. We discuss how this evidence-based integration helps to advance team membership research.","PeriodicalId":48333,"journal":{"name":"Academy of Management Annals","volume":"181 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academy of Management Annals","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5465/ANNALS.2019.0110","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Teams are open dynamic systems with malleable membership. Depending on the specific attributes of new, incumbent, and departing members, membership change implies different changes in different aspects of team composition and structure and cannot be studied assuming all membership changes are created equal. We integrate evidence concerning team membership change in the management and psychology literatures and propose a theoretical framework to guide future research. The core mechanisms in the framework are: Membership change disrupts team cognitive, affective, motivational, and behavioral processes and states that require individual members’ actions and interactions to be developed and sustained and thereby jeopardize team performance at least in the short term. Yet, teams can adapt to membership change and recovers performance in the long term. To what extent teams experience the disruptive detriment and adaptive benefit will depend on (a) the magnitude of membership change, (b) the improvement or deterioration in team knowledge, skills, abilities, and other characteristics (KSAOs) and (c) task resources and social support inside and outside the team. Moreover, poor team performance and poor team experiences are the two main causes for team membership change. We discuss how this evidence-based integration helps to advance team membership research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
团队成员变更的原因和结果:一个时间视角
团队是开放的动态系统,成员具有可塑性。根据新成员、在职成员和离职成员的具体属性,成员变更意味着团队组成和结构的不同方面的不同变化,并且不能假设所有成员变更都是平等的。我们整合了管理学和心理学文献中关于团队成员变化的证据,并提出了一个理论框架来指导未来的研究。该框架中的核心机制是:成员变更破坏了团队的认知、情感、动机和行为过程和状态,这些过程和状态要求个体成员的行动和互动得到发展和维持,从而至少在短期内危及团队绩效。然而,团队可以适应成员的变化,并在长期内恢复绩效。团队经历破坏性损害和适应性利益的程度将取决于(a)成员变化的幅度,(b)团队知识、技能、能力和其他特征(KSAOs)的改善或恶化,以及(c)团队内外的任务资源和社会支持。此外,较差的团队绩效和较差的团队体验是导致团队成员变化的两个主要原因。我们将讨论这种基于证据的整合如何帮助推进团队成员研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
36.00
自引率
1.40%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: The mission of the Academy of Management Annals (Annals) is to publish up-to-date, in-depth and integrative reviews of research advances in management. Often called "reviews with an attitude," Annals papers summarize and/or challenge established assumptions and concepts, pinpoint problems and factual errors, inspire discussions, and illuminate possible avenues for further study. Reviews published in Annals move above and beyond descriptions of the field–they motivate conceptual integration and set agendas for future research.
期刊最新文献
Categorizing Concepts and Phenomena in Management Research: A Four-Phase Integrative Review and Recommendations Standardization: Research Trends, Current Debates, and Interdisciplinarity Purpose in Management Research: Navigating a Complex and Fragmented Area of Study Heuristics in Organizations: Toward an Integrative Process Model Understanding How People React to Change: A Domain of Uncertainty Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1