BiRD: Race Detection in Software Binaries under Relaxed Memory Models

Ridhi Jain, Rahul Purandare, Subodh Sharma
{"title":"BiRD: Race Detection in Software Binaries under Relaxed Memory Models","authors":"Ridhi Jain, Rahul Purandare, Subodh Sharma","doi":"10.1145/3498538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Instruction reordering and interleavings in program execution under relaxed memory semantics result in non-intuitive behaviors, making it difficult to provide assurances about program correctness. Studies have shown that up to 90% of the concurrency bugs reported by state-of-the-art static analyzers are false alarms. As a result, filtering false alarms and detecting real concurrency bugs is a challenging problem. Unsurprisingly, this problem has attracted the interest of the research community over the past few decades. Nonetheless, many of the existing techniques rely on analyzing source code, rarely consider the effects introduced by compilers, and assume a sequentially consistent memory model. In a practical setting, however, developers often do not have access to the source code, and even commodity architectures such as x86 and ARM are not sequentially consistent. In this work, we present Bird, a prototype tool, to dynamically detect harmful data races in x86 binaries under relaxed memory models, TSO and PSO. Bird employs source-DPOR to explore all distinct feasible interleavings for a multithreaded application. Our evaluation of Bird on 42 publicly available benchmarks and its comparison with the state-of-the-art tools indicate Bird’s potential in effectively detecting data races in software binaries.","PeriodicalId":7398,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM)","volume":"86 1","pages":"1 - 29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3498538","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Instruction reordering and interleavings in program execution under relaxed memory semantics result in non-intuitive behaviors, making it difficult to provide assurances about program correctness. Studies have shown that up to 90% of the concurrency bugs reported by state-of-the-art static analyzers are false alarms. As a result, filtering false alarms and detecting real concurrency bugs is a challenging problem. Unsurprisingly, this problem has attracted the interest of the research community over the past few decades. Nonetheless, many of the existing techniques rely on analyzing source code, rarely consider the effects introduced by compilers, and assume a sequentially consistent memory model. In a practical setting, however, developers often do not have access to the source code, and even commodity architectures such as x86 and ARM are not sequentially consistent. In this work, we present Bird, a prototype tool, to dynamically detect harmful data races in x86 binaries under relaxed memory models, TSO and PSO. Bird employs source-DPOR to explore all distinct feasible interleavings for a multithreaded application. Our evaluation of Bird on 42 publicly available benchmarks and its comparison with the state-of-the-art tools indicate Bird’s potential in effectively detecting data races in software binaries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
BiRD:放松内存模型下软件二进制文件中的竞赛检测
在宽松的内存语义下,程序执行中的指令重排序和交错会导致非直观的行为,使程序的正确性难以保证。研究表明,由最先进的静态分析器报告的并发错误中,高达90%是假警报。因此,过滤假警报和检测真正的并发错误是一个具有挑战性的问题。不出所料,这个问题在过去几十年里引起了研究界的兴趣。尽管如此,许多现有的技术依赖于分析源代码,很少考虑编译器引入的影响,并假设一个顺序一致的内存模型。然而,在实际环境中,开发人员通常无法访问源代码,甚至像x86和ARM这样的商品体系结构也不是顺序一致的。在这项工作中,我们提出了Bird,一个原型工具,在宽松内存模型,TSO和PSO下动态检测x86二进制文件中的有害数据争用。Bird使用source-DPOR来探索多线程应用程序中所有不同的可行交错。我们在42个公开可用的基准测试上对Bird进行了评估,并将其与最先进的工具进行了比较,表明Bird在有效检测软件二进制文件中的数据竞争方面具有潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Turnover of Companies in OpenStack: Prevalence and Rationale Super-optimization of Smart Contracts Verification of Programs Sensitive to Heap Layout Assessing and Improving an Evaluation Dataset for Detecting Semantic Code Clones via Deep Learning Guaranteeing Timed Opacity using Parametric Timed Model Checking
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1