Turnover of Companies in OpenStack: Prevalence and Rationale

Yuxia Zhang, Hui Liu, Xin Tan, Minghui Zhou, Zhi Jin, Jiaxin Zhu
{"title":"Turnover of Companies in OpenStack: Prevalence and Rationale","authors":"Yuxia Zhang, Hui Liu, Xin Tan, Minghui Zhou, Zhi Jin, Jiaxin Zhu","doi":"10.1145/3510849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To achieve commercial goals, companies have made substantial contributions to large open-source software (OSS) ecosystems such as OpenStack and have become the main contributors. However, they often withdraw their employees for a variety of reasons, which may affect the sustainability of OSS projects. While the turnover of individual contributors has been extensively investigated, there is a lack of knowledge about the nature of companies’ withdrawal. To this end, we conduct a mixed-methods empirical study on OpenStack to reveal how common company withdrawals were, to what degree withdrawn companies made contributions, and what the rationale behind withdrawals was. By analyzing the commit data of 18 versions of OpenStack, we find that the number of companies that have left is increasing and even surpasses the number of companies that have joined in later versions. Approximately 12% of the companies in each version have exited by the next version. Compared to the sustaining companies that joined in the same version, the withdrawn companies tend to have a weaker contribution intensity but contribute to a similar scope of repositories in OpenStack. Through conducting a developer survey, we find four aspects of reasons for companies’ withdrawal from OpenStack: company, community, developer, and project. The most common reasons lie in the company aspect, i.e., the company either achieved its goals or failed to do so. By fitting the survival analysis model, we find that commercial goals are associated with the probability of the company’s withdrawal, and that a company’s contribution intensity and scale are positively correlated with its retention. Maintaining good retention is important but challenging for OSS ecosystems, and our results may shed light on potential approaches to improve company retention and reduce the negative impact of company withdrawal.","PeriodicalId":7398,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM)","volume":"14 1","pages":"1 - 24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3510849","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

To achieve commercial goals, companies have made substantial contributions to large open-source software (OSS) ecosystems such as OpenStack and have become the main contributors. However, they often withdraw their employees for a variety of reasons, which may affect the sustainability of OSS projects. While the turnover of individual contributors has been extensively investigated, there is a lack of knowledge about the nature of companies’ withdrawal. To this end, we conduct a mixed-methods empirical study on OpenStack to reveal how common company withdrawals were, to what degree withdrawn companies made contributions, and what the rationale behind withdrawals was. By analyzing the commit data of 18 versions of OpenStack, we find that the number of companies that have left is increasing and even surpasses the number of companies that have joined in later versions. Approximately 12% of the companies in each version have exited by the next version. Compared to the sustaining companies that joined in the same version, the withdrawn companies tend to have a weaker contribution intensity but contribute to a similar scope of repositories in OpenStack. Through conducting a developer survey, we find four aspects of reasons for companies’ withdrawal from OpenStack: company, community, developer, and project. The most common reasons lie in the company aspect, i.e., the company either achieved its goals or failed to do so. By fitting the survival analysis model, we find that commercial goals are associated with the probability of the company’s withdrawal, and that a company’s contribution intensity and scale are positively correlated with its retention. Maintaining good retention is important but challenging for OSS ecosystems, and our results may shed light on potential approaches to improve company retention and reduce the negative impact of company withdrawal.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
OpenStack中的公司更替:流行和基本原理
为了实现商业目标,公司对大型开源软件(OSS)生态系统(如OpenStack)做出了大量贡献,并成为主要贡献者。然而,他们经常因为各种各样的原因撤回他们的员工,这可能会影响OSS项目的可持续性。虽然对个人出资人的离职进行了广泛调查,但人们对公司离职的性质却缺乏了解。为此,我们对OpenStack进行了混合方法的实证研究,以揭示公司退出的常见程度,退出的公司做出贡献的程度以及退出背后的理由是什么。通过分析18个版本OpenStack的提交数据,我们发现退出的公司越来越多,甚至超过了后续版本加入的公司。每个版本中大约有12%的公司在下一个版本中退出。与加入同一版本的持续公司相比,退出的公司往往贡献强度较弱,但对OpenStack中存储库的贡献范围相似。通过对开发者的调查,我们发现企业退出OpenStack的原因有四个方面:公司、社区、开发者和项目。最常见的原因是公司方面,即公司要么实现了目标,要么没有实现目标。通过拟合生存分析模型,我们发现商业目标与企业退出概率呈正相关,企业的贡献强度和规模与企业保留率呈正相关。保持良好的保留对于OSS生态系统来说是重要的,但也是具有挑战性的,我们的结果可能会揭示出改善公司保留和减少公司退出的负面影响的潜在方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Turnover of Companies in OpenStack: Prevalence and Rationale Super-optimization of Smart Contracts Verification of Programs Sensitive to Heap Layout Assessing and Improving an Evaluation Dataset for Detecting Semantic Code Clones via Deep Learning Guaranteeing Timed Opacity using Parametric Timed Model Checking
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1