Verification of classification modernization solutions (the case study of Library Bibliographic Classification)

IF 0.2 Q4 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Nauchnye i Tekhnicheskie Biblioteki-Scientific and Technical Libraries Pub Date : 2023-08-14 DOI:10.33186/1027-3689-2023-8-122-140
Н. Н. Голоднова, М. А. Пивоварова, N. N. Golodnova, Marina A. Pivovarova
{"title":"Verification of classification modernization solutions (the case study of Library Bibliographic Classification)","authors":"Н. Н. Голоднова, М. А. Пивоварова, N. N. Golodnova, Marina A. Pivovarova","doi":"10.33186/1027-3689-2023-8-122-140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Efficiency of library classifications depends on their capacity to embrace current knowledge and social practices. Therefore, the verification (late Latin verificatio – evidence, confirmation, from the Latin verus – true and facio – to make) of upgrade solutions is an essential part of classification system operation and development. The problem of library classification verification is often out of researchers view. The verification mechanism (tools) for upgrade solutions has not been described yet. Therefore, the reliability and relevance of classification upgrade solutions is of scientific and practical value.The purpose of the paper is to summarize the related experience of Research LBC Center of the Russian State Library. Based on s tructured system analysis and the long practice of LBC development and application, the authors examine the mechanism for monitoring publications and identifying innovations, including new terms, concepts, social phenomena, etc., and for assessing and processing data for continuing update of the classification system. Using the example of LBC modernization solutions, the authors discuss advantages and disadvantages of individual methods. They conclude that the classification upgrade verification – essential to the nature of the library classification systems – has to become the key element of the classifying culture. The researchers review and suggest the ways to improve the verification mechanism adopted at the RSL LBC Research Center. The integrated approach to LBC verification is of applied relevance both for the theory of classifications and librarianship.","PeriodicalId":42851,"journal":{"name":"Nauchnye i Tekhnicheskie Biblioteki-Scientific and Technical Libraries","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nauchnye i Tekhnicheskie Biblioteki-Scientific and Technical Libraries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33186/1027-3689-2023-8-122-140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Efficiency of library classifications depends on their capacity to embrace current knowledge and social practices. Therefore, the verification (late Latin verificatio – evidence, confirmation, from the Latin verus – true and facio – to make) of upgrade solutions is an essential part of classification system operation and development. The problem of library classification verification is often out of researchers view. The verification mechanism (tools) for upgrade solutions has not been described yet. Therefore, the reliability and relevance of classification upgrade solutions is of scientific and practical value.The purpose of the paper is to summarize the related experience of Research LBC Center of the Russian State Library. Based on s tructured system analysis and the long practice of LBC development and application, the authors examine the mechanism for monitoring publications and identifying innovations, including new terms, concepts, social phenomena, etc., and for assessing and processing data for continuing update of the classification system. Using the example of LBC modernization solutions, the authors discuss advantages and disadvantages of individual methods. They conclude that the classification upgrade verification – essential to the nature of the library classification systems – has to become the key element of the classifying culture. The researchers review and suggest the ways to improve the verification mechanism adopted at the RSL LBC Research Center. The integrated approach to LBC verification is of applied relevance both for the theory of classifications and librarianship.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分类现代化解决方案的验证(以图书馆书目分类为例)
图书馆分类法的效率取决于其对当前知识和社会实践的适应能力。因此,对升级方案的验证(后期拉丁语verificatio -证据,确认,源自拉丁语verus -真实和facio -使)是分类系统运行和发展的重要组成部分。图书馆的分类验证问题往往是研究者们所没有注意到的。升级解决方案的验证机制(工具)还没有被描述。因此,分类升级方案的可靠性和相关性具有一定的科学和实用价值。本文旨在总结俄罗斯国家图书馆LBC研究中心的相关经验。基于结构化系统分析和LBC发展和应用的长期实践,作者研究了监测出版物和识别创新的机制,包括新的术语、概念、社会现象等,以及评估和处理数据以不断更新分类系统。以LBC现代化解决方案为例,讨论了各个方法的优缺点。他们得出结论,分类法升级验证是图书馆分类法制度的本质,必须成为分类法文化的关键要素。研究人员回顾并提出了改进RSL LBC研究中心采用的验证机制的方法。LBC验证的综合方法对分类学理论和图书馆学都具有应用价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
66.70%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Grouping and categorizing library services at the official websites of central libraries of RF constituent territories: The need for standardized diversification The review of scientific research conducted by libraries: What comes next? Verification of classification modernization solutions (the case study of Library Bibliographic Classification) The virtual reality technologies in the educational processes in Kemerovo State Institute of Culture Special components of society digital transformation to influence technological and behavioral models of modern libraries (Annual report at the Seventh World Professional Forum “SOCHI–2023”)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1