Usage of Maize Storage Technologies for Postharvest Loss Prevention in OkeOgun/Saki Area of Oyo State, Nigeria

O. Benson, A. A. Afolabi, A. Ajayi, Temitope S. Taiwo, Oluwabunmi M. Omotuyi, E. Okonkwo
{"title":"Usage of Maize Storage Technologies for Postharvest Loss Prevention in OkeOgun/Saki Area of Oyo State, Nigeria","authors":"O. Benson, A. A. Afolabi, A. Ajayi, Temitope S. Taiwo, Oluwabunmi M. Omotuyi, E. Okonkwo","doi":"10.4314/JAE.V25I1.2S","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study’s objective assessed the usage of traditional and improved maize storage technologies by farmers in Saki/Oke-Ogun area of Oyo State. The study was conducted from April-July, 2019; using a validated structured questionnaire for data collection. A multi-stage sampling technique was adopted to draw a sample of 191 maize farmers. Grain storage technologies usage frequency was measured on a four-point Likert-type numerical scale 4-1 as regularly, occasionally, seldom, and never respectively. Descriptive analysis of collected data revealed regular usage of both raffia woven basket (98.9%) and traditional crib (96.1%) by respondents.  Sampled maize farmers overwhelmingly indicated non-usage of rhombus (98.0%) to store their produce; with a substantial number (88.2%) rarely using containers. Further analysis shows maize farmers used improved crib regularly (76.5%). Inert atmosphere silo (80.4%), conventional silo (76.5%), purdue improved crop storage (90.2%) and zerofly™ (65.4%) bags were never used to store maize by farmers. Chi-square ) analysis revealed significant (p≤0.05) associations between technology usage and socioeconomic characteristics of maize farmers. The cost and bulk storage nature of improved storage technology could be traced to its never used; while awareness is also very low on the use of those cost effective bagged technologies.This study’s objective assessed the usage of traditional and improved maize storage technologies by farmers in Saki/Oke-Ogun area of Oyo State. The study was conducted from April-July, 2019; using a validated structured questionnaire for data collection. A multi-stage sampling technique was adopted to draw a sample of 191 maize farmers. Grain storage technologies usage frequency was measured on a four-point Likert-type numerical scale 4-1 as regularly, occasionally, seldom, and never respectively. Descriptive analysis of collected data revealed regular usage of both raffia woven basket (98.9%) and traditional crib (96.1%) by respondents.  Sampled maize farmers overwhelmingly indicated non-usage of rhombus (98.0%) to store their produce; with a substantial number (88.2%) rarely using containers. Further analysis shows maize farmers used improved crib regularly (76.5%). Inert atmosphere silo (80.4%), conventional silo (76.5%), purdue improved crop storage (90.2%) and zerofly™ (65.4%) bags were never used to store maize by farmers. Chi-square ) analysis revealed significant (p≤0.05) associations between technology usage and socioeconomic characteristics of maize farmers. The cost and bulk storage nature of improved storage technology could be traced to its never used; while awareness is also very low on the use of those cost effective bagged technologies.","PeriodicalId":22617,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Agricultural Extension","volume":"6 1","pages":"29-37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Agricultural Extension","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/JAE.V25I1.2S","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study’s objective assessed the usage of traditional and improved maize storage technologies by farmers in Saki/Oke-Ogun area of Oyo State. The study was conducted from April-July, 2019; using a validated structured questionnaire for data collection. A multi-stage sampling technique was adopted to draw a sample of 191 maize farmers. Grain storage technologies usage frequency was measured on a four-point Likert-type numerical scale 4-1 as regularly, occasionally, seldom, and never respectively. Descriptive analysis of collected data revealed regular usage of both raffia woven basket (98.9%) and traditional crib (96.1%) by respondents.  Sampled maize farmers overwhelmingly indicated non-usage of rhombus (98.0%) to store their produce; with a substantial number (88.2%) rarely using containers. Further analysis shows maize farmers used improved crib regularly (76.5%). Inert atmosphere silo (80.4%), conventional silo (76.5%), purdue improved crop storage (90.2%) and zerofly™ (65.4%) bags were never used to store maize by farmers. Chi-square ) analysis revealed significant (p≤0.05) associations between technology usage and socioeconomic characteristics of maize farmers. The cost and bulk storage nature of improved storage technology could be traced to its never used; while awareness is also very low on the use of those cost effective bagged technologies.This study’s objective assessed the usage of traditional and improved maize storage technologies by farmers in Saki/Oke-Ogun area of Oyo State. The study was conducted from April-July, 2019; using a validated structured questionnaire for data collection. A multi-stage sampling technique was adopted to draw a sample of 191 maize farmers. Grain storage technologies usage frequency was measured on a four-point Likert-type numerical scale 4-1 as regularly, occasionally, seldom, and never respectively. Descriptive analysis of collected data revealed regular usage of both raffia woven basket (98.9%) and traditional crib (96.1%) by respondents.  Sampled maize farmers overwhelmingly indicated non-usage of rhombus (98.0%) to store their produce; with a substantial number (88.2%) rarely using containers. Further analysis shows maize farmers used improved crib regularly (76.5%). Inert atmosphere silo (80.4%), conventional silo (76.5%), purdue improved crop storage (90.2%) and zerofly™ (65.4%) bags were never used to store maize by farmers. Chi-square ) analysis revealed significant (p≤0.05) associations between technology usage and socioeconomic characteristics of maize farmers. The cost and bulk storage nature of improved storage technology could be traced to its never used; while awareness is also very low on the use of those cost effective bagged technologies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在尼日利亚奥约州OkeOgun/Saki地区使用玉米储存技术预防采后损失
本研究的目的是评估奥约州Saki/Oke-Ogun地区农民对传统和改良玉米储存技术的使用情况。该研究于2019年4月至7月进行;使用经过验证的结构化问卷进行数据收集。采用多阶段抽样技术抽取191名玉米农户样本。粮食储存技术的使用频率以李克特式4点数值量表4-1分别为定期、偶尔、很少和从不。对收集数据的描述性分析显示,受访者经常使用拉菲亚编织篮子(98.9%)和传统婴儿床(96.1%)。抽样的玉米农民绝大多数表示不使用菱形(98.0%)来储存他们的产品;有相当多的人(88.2%)很少使用容器。进一步分析显示,种植玉米的农民经常使用改良的玉米槽(76.5%)。惰性气氛筒仓(80.4%)、传统筒仓(76.5%)、普度改良作物储藏(90.2%)和zerofly™袋(65.4%)从未被农民用于储存玉米。卡方分析显示,技术使用与玉米农户社会经济特征之间存在显著(p≤0.05)相关性。改进的存储技术的成本和批量存储性质可以追溯到它从未使用过;同时,人们对使用这些具有成本效益的袋装技术的认识也很低。本研究的目的是评估奥约州Saki/Oke-Ogun地区农民对传统和改良玉米储存技术的使用情况。该研究于2019年4月至7月进行;使用经过验证的结构化问卷进行数据收集。采用多阶段抽样技术抽取191名玉米农户样本。粮食储存技术的使用频率以李克特式4点数值量表4-1分别为定期、偶尔、很少和从不。对收集数据的描述性分析显示,受访者经常使用拉菲亚编织篮子(98.9%)和传统婴儿床(96.1%)。抽样的玉米农民绝大多数表示不使用菱形(98.0%)来储存他们的产品;有相当多的人(88.2%)很少使用容器。进一步分析显示,种植玉米的农民经常使用改良的玉米槽(76.5%)。惰性气氛筒仓(80.4%)、传统筒仓(76.5%)、普度改良作物储藏(90.2%)和zerofly™袋(65.4%)从未被农民用于储存玉米。卡方分析显示,技术使用与玉米农户社会经济特征之间存在显著(p≤0.05)相关性。改进的存储技术的成本和批量存储性质可以追溯到它从未使用过;同时,人们对使用这些具有成本效益的袋装技术的认识也很低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Veganic Agriculture in the United States: Opportunities for Research, Outreach, and Education Lessons Learned from the Development of the North Carolina Extension Master Food Volunteer Program Designing Educational Newsletter Interventions: An Example That Supported Grandfamilies’ Physical Wellness Needs 4-H Youth Development Programming in Indigenous Communities: A Critical Review of Cooperative Extension Literature Scenario Planning for Resilient Agricultural Systems: A Process for Engaging Controversy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1