Verständlichkeitsmessung mit MVP-Online: Einflussfaktoren und Validitätsaspekte

IF 0.5 Q4 Health Professions Sprache-Stimme-Gehor Pub Date : 2009-03-01 DOI:10.1055/S-0028-1102926
N. Nowack, D. Zwartyes, A. Zierdt, W. Ziegler
{"title":"Verständlichkeitsmessung mit MVP-Online: Einflussfaktoren und Validitätsaspekte","authors":"N. Nowack, D. Zwartyes, A. Zierdt, W. Ziegler","doi":"10.1055/S-0028-1102926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Standardized intelligibility measurement is an indispensable component in the diagnostic assessment of dysarthria, since intelligibility is one of the most important parameters of dysarthric impairment. This article introduces an online application of the Munich Intelligibility Profile (MVP). The MVP is a computer-based, reliable, and valid method for the assessment of intelligibility in dysarthric speakers. MVP-Online allows for online patient examinations and dispenses clinicians from any further evaluation tasks. The patients’ speech samples are evaluated by a phonetics laboratory and the intelligibility report is provided via e-mail. The examinations reported here referred to major listener factors influencing the outcome of MVP-Online. METHODS: Three listener groups differing by age and by MVP-experience evaluated recordings from 12 dysarthric patients and 12 healthy controls. Furthermore, listener ratings were collected as external criteria to be compared with MVP scores. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The results revealed that listener age had an unspecific influence on MVP-scores of both normal and dysarthric speakers, while listener experience specifically influenced the results obtained for the dysarthric patients. This finding has to be considered in standard clinical applications of MVP-Online. Comparisons of MVP scores with intelligibility ratings revealed that standard methods for the assessment of intelligibility, such as MVP-Online, yield more valid results compared to simple intelligibility ratings.","PeriodicalId":49480,"journal":{"name":"Sprache-Stimme-Gehor","volume":"26 1","pages":"16-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2009-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sprache-Stimme-Gehor","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/S-0028-1102926","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Standardized intelligibility measurement is an indispensable component in the diagnostic assessment of dysarthria, since intelligibility is one of the most important parameters of dysarthric impairment. This article introduces an online application of the Munich Intelligibility Profile (MVP). The MVP is a computer-based, reliable, and valid method for the assessment of intelligibility in dysarthric speakers. MVP-Online allows for online patient examinations and dispenses clinicians from any further evaluation tasks. The patients’ speech samples are evaluated by a phonetics laboratory and the intelligibility report is provided via e-mail. The examinations reported here referred to major listener factors influencing the outcome of MVP-Online. METHODS: Three listener groups differing by age and by MVP-experience evaluated recordings from 12 dysarthric patients and 12 healthy controls. Furthermore, listener ratings were collected as external criteria to be compared with MVP scores. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The results revealed that listener age had an unspecific influence on MVP-scores of both normal and dysarthric speakers, while listener experience specifically influenced the results obtained for the dysarthric patients. This finding has to be considered in standard clinical applications of MVP-Online. Comparisons of MVP scores with intelligibility ratings revealed that standard methods for the assessment of intelligibility, such as MVP-Online, yield more valid results compared to simple intelligibility ratings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
mvp在线代理:影响因素和合法性因素
背景:标准化的可理解性测量是构音障碍诊断评估中不可或缺的组成部分,因为可理解性是构音障碍最重要的参数之一。本文介绍了慕尼黑可理解性概况(MVP)的在线应用。MVP是一种基于计算机的,可靠的,有效的方法来评估发音困难的说话者的可理解性。MVP-Online允许在线患者检查和分配临床医生从任何进一步的评估任务。患者的语音样本由语音学实验室评估,可理解度报告通过电子邮件提供。本文报告的检查涉及影响MVP-Online结果的主要听者因素。方法:三个不同年龄和mvp经历的听众组评估了12名疼痛障碍患者和12名健康对照者的录音。此外,听众的评分被收集为外部标准,与MVP分数进行比较。结果与结论:结果显示,听者年龄对正常和困难说话者的mvp得分均有非特异性影响,而听者经验对困难说话者的mvp得分有特异性影响。这一发现必须在MVP-Online的标准临床应用中加以考虑。MVP得分与可理解性评级的比较表明,可理解性评估的标准方法,如MVP- online,比简单的可理解性评级产生更有效的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sprache-Stimme-Gehor
Sprache-Stimme-Gehor 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
20.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Sprache · Stimme · Gehör ist die Fachzeitschrift für alle, die sich mit Sprach-, Stimm- und Hörstörungen beschäftigen – von Logopäden über Phoniater/Pädaudiologen bis hin zu Sprachheilpädagogen oder Hörgeschädigtenpädagogen. Sie vermittelt gesicherte medizinische Fakten für Ihre Fortbildung – maximaler Praxisnutzen, größtmögliche Unterstützung in Ihrem Alltag und der berühmte Blick über den Tellerrand sind unsere Ziele.
期刊最新文献
Bestimmung grammatischer Fähigkeiten von Kindern anhand elizitierter Sprachproduktion – Vorstellung eines neuen Verfahrens Liebe Leserin, lieber Leser, Spracherwerb und digitale Medien Therapie von Sprachentwicklungsstörungen Arbeitsgedächtnisleistungen nach Cochlea-ImplantatVersorgung
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1