Allawah Grove native settlement: Housing and assimilation

IF 0.4 Q1 HISTORY Aboriginal History Pub Date : 2015-12-16 DOI:10.22459/AH.39.2015.04
S. Delmege
{"title":"Allawah Grove native settlement: Housing and assimilation","authors":"S. Delmege","doi":"10.22459/AH.39.2015.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is well known that the rationale for state intervention in the lives of Indigenous Australians performed a volte face when 'assimilation' was adopted in 1937. By the 1960s, 'integration' had emerged as a preferred guiding principle, but the goal remained the same: to incorporate Aborigines within the broader community as self-directed social and economic equals. However, a fundamental lack of respect for Aboriginal culture, combined with the idea that 'part‑Aborigines' had no cultural heritage, ensured that Aboriginal identity, agency and autonomy were largely ignored. Since then, we have witnessed shifts to 'self-determination', 'reconciliation' and to 'closing the [health and well-being] gap', but there is still a long way to go before any of these principles are fully achieved.","PeriodicalId":42397,"journal":{"name":"Aboriginal History","volume":"260 1","pages":"83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aboriginal History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22459/AH.39.2015.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

It is well known that the rationale for state intervention in the lives of Indigenous Australians performed a volte face when 'assimilation' was adopted in 1937. By the 1960s, 'integration' had emerged as a preferred guiding principle, but the goal remained the same: to incorporate Aborigines within the broader community as self-directed social and economic equals. However, a fundamental lack of respect for Aboriginal culture, combined with the idea that 'part‑Aborigines' had no cultural heritage, ensured that Aboriginal identity, agency and autonomy were largely ignored. Since then, we have witnessed shifts to 'self-determination', 'reconciliation' and to 'closing the [health and well-being] gap', but there is still a long way to go before any of these principles are fully achieved.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿拉瓦格罗夫土著定居点:住房和同化
众所周知,当1937年采用“同化”时,国家干预澳大利亚土著生活的理由发生了转变。到20世纪60年代,“融合”已经成为首选的指导原则,但目标仍然是一样的:将土著居民纳入更广泛的社区,作为自主的社会和经济平等。然而,由于根本不尊重土著文化,再加上“部分土著”没有文化遗产的想法,土著的身份、能动性和自主权在很大程度上被忽视了。从那时起,我们目睹了向“自决”、“和解”和“缩小(健康和福祉)差距”的转变,但要完全实现这些原则中的任何一项,仍有很长的路要走。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
The Unsettled exhibition: Laura McBride and Mariko Smith in conversation ‘No time for a history lesson’: The contest over memorials to Angus McMillan on Gunaikurnai Country ‘People come and go, but this place doesn’t’: Narrating the creation of the Krowathunkooloong Keeping Place as cultural resurgence Asserting Aboriginal polity and nationhood: The campaign for the return of Indigenous Ancestral Remains The 1918–19 Influenza pandemic and its impact on Aboriginal people in South Australia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1