Reasonable Doubts

IF 2 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Women-A Cultural Review Pub Date : 2023-04-03 DOI:10.1080/09574042.2023.2196170
A. Hepburn
{"title":"Reasonable Doubts","authors":"A. Hepburn","doi":"10.1080/09574042.2023.2196170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Rose Macaulay’s novel, The Making of a Bigot (1914), a young man named Eddy is buffeted by various intellectual movements and beset by spiritual hesitations. He thinks he might become an Anglican clergyman, but he worries that ministers draw lines, object to people on no particular grounds, and dismiss points of view that are not their own. In one of his typical outbursts, Eddy advocates liberal tolerance: ‘It’s absurd to quarrel about the respective merits of different principles, when all are so excellent.’ In the end, his tolerance comes across as complacency or a failure to discriminate reasonable ideas from outrageous opinions. After knocking about the world for a while, Eddy decides to become a bigot who rallies behind a single cause: ‘the one way, it seemed, to be of use was to take a definite line and stick to it and reject all others.’ Yet hope is not entirely lost. Eddy considers becoming a novelist, because ‘in novels one may take as many points of view as one likes, all at the same time.’ For Macaulay, a self-described Anglo-agnostic, the novel is the perfect genre for figuring out one’s spiritual commitments or one’s reasons not to endorse any religion at all. The novel is a genre in which doubt has its place and irony tests the value of an idea. Macaulay shows up several times in Suzanne Hobson’s Unbelief in Interwar Literary Culture: Doubting Modernisms, notably as an unbeliever who announces the demise of secularism circa 1879. Yet, as Hobson notes, secularism animated modernist literary production for decades after Macaulay’s announcement of its disappearance. Militant secularists appear throughout modernist fiction, now as Charles Tansley in To the Lighthouse, now as Tom Brangwen in The Rainbow, now as Richard Smythe in The End of the Affair. In Hobson’s delightful definition, secularism refers to ‘the dredging of religion from the public sphere’ (2), as if religion were muck at the bottom of a river. Secularists think that religion—specifically Christianity in interwar Britain—falsely claims to have a monopoly on truth and creates obstacles to human progress. Suzanne Hobson, Unbelief in Interwar Literary Culture: Doubting Modernisms, Oxford University Press, 2022, £60 hardback, 9780192846471.","PeriodicalId":54053,"journal":{"name":"Women-A Cultural Review","volume":"272 1","pages":"151 - 154"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women-A Cultural Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09574042.2023.2196170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Rose Macaulay’s novel, The Making of a Bigot (1914), a young man named Eddy is buffeted by various intellectual movements and beset by spiritual hesitations. He thinks he might become an Anglican clergyman, but he worries that ministers draw lines, object to people on no particular grounds, and dismiss points of view that are not their own. In one of his typical outbursts, Eddy advocates liberal tolerance: ‘It’s absurd to quarrel about the respective merits of different principles, when all are so excellent.’ In the end, his tolerance comes across as complacency or a failure to discriminate reasonable ideas from outrageous opinions. After knocking about the world for a while, Eddy decides to become a bigot who rallies behind a single cause: ‘the one way, it seemed, to be of use was to take a definite line and stick to it and reject all others.’ Yet hope is not entirely lost. Eddy considers becoming a novelist, because ‘in novels one may take as many points of view as one likes, all at the same time.’ For Macaulay, a self-described Anglo-agnostic, the novel is the perfect genre for figuring out one’s spiritual commitments or one’s reasons not to endorse any religion at all. The novel is a genre in which doubt has its place and irony tests the value of an idea. Macaulay shows up several times in Suzanne Hobson’s Unbelief in Interwar Literary Culture: Doubting Modernisms, notably as an unbeliever who announces the demise of secularism circa 1879. Yet, as Hobson notes, secularism animated modernist literary production for decades after Macaulay’s announcement of its disappearance. Militant secularists appear throughout modernist fiction, now as Charles Tansley in To the Lighthouse, now as Tom Brangwen in The Rainbow, now as Richard Smythe in The End of the Affair. In Hobson’s delightful definition, secularism refers to ‘the dredging of religion from the public sphere’ (2), as if religion were muck at the bottom of a river. Secularists think that religion—specifically Christianity in interwar Britain—falsely claims to have a monopoly on truth and creates obstacles to human progress. Suzanne Hobson, Unbelief in Interwar Literary Culture: Doubting Modernisms, Oxford University Press, 2022, £60 hardback, 9780192846471.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
合理的怀疑
在罗斯·麦考利的小说《偏执者的形成》(1914)中,一个名叫艾迪的年轻人受到各种知识分子运动的冲击,并被精神上的犹豫所困扰。他认为自己可能会成为一名英国国教牧师,但他担心牧师们会划清界限,毫无理由地反对他人,并摒弃非自己的观点。在一次典型的爆发中,艾迪提倡自由主义的宽容:“在所有原则都如此优秀的情况下,争论不同原则各自的优点是荒谬的。最后,他的宽容给人的印象是自满,或者是无法区分合理的观点和离谱的观点。在周游世界一段时间后,艾迪决定成为一个固执的人,为一个目标而团结起来:“似乎唯一有用的方法就是坚持一条明确的路线,拒绝所有其他的。”然而,希望并没有完全丧失。艾迪考虑成为一名小说家,因为“在小说中,一个人可以同时持有自己喜欢的多种观点。”麦考利自称是盎格鲁不可知论者,对于他来说,这种小说是一种完美的类型,可以让他找出自己的精神承诺,或者一个人不支持任何宗教的理由。在小说这种体裁中,怀疑占有一席之地,反讽检验一种思想的价值。麦考利在苏珊娜·霍布森(Suzanne Hobson)的《两次世界大战间文学文化的不信仰:对现代主义的怀疑》一书中多次出现,尤其是在1879年左右,他作为一个不信教的人宣布了世俗主义的灭亡。然而,正如霍布森所指出的那样,世俗主义在麦考利宣布其消失后的几十年里仍在为现代主义文学作品注入活力。激进的世俗主义者出现在现代主义小说中,时而是《到灯塔去》中的查尔斯·坦斯利,时而是《彩虹》中的汤姆·布兰文,时而是《婚外情的结局》中的理查德·斯迈思。在霍布森令人愉快的定义中,世俗主义指的是“从公共领域中疏浚宗教”(2),就好像宗教是河底的淤泥。世俗主义者认为宗教——尤其是两次世界大战之间英国的基督教——错误地宣称自己垄断了真理,并为人类进步制造了障碍。苏珊娜·霍布森:《不相信两次世界大战之间的文学文化:对现代主义的怀疑》,牛津大学出版社,2022年,精装本,9780192846471英镑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Women-A Cultural Review
Women-A Cultural Review HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
9.10%
发文量
34
期刊最新文献
About Our Contributors Living with the Ancestors Feminist Depictions of Coercive Control in ‘Domestic Noir’: Ilsa Evans’s Broken (2007) and Kathryn Heyman’s Storm and Grace (2017) Colonized Brown Motherhood: Em and the Big Hoom, Imelda and Indian Mothering Introduction: Imagining and Reimagining Emotional Labour
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1