Multidisciplinary goal attainment measure (MGAM): A review of stroke client goal-based outcomes within a community rehabilitation setting in Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Anita Blight, Sarah A. Patterson, Hannah Matson, Alisha Westerman
{"title":"Multidisciplinary goal attainment measure (MGAM): A review of stroke client goal-based outcomes within a community rehabilitation setting in Brisbane, Queensland, Australia","authors":"Anita Blight, Sarah A. Patterson, Hannah Matson, Alisha Westerman","doi":"10.5348/100051d05ab2021ra","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: Community rehabilitation is a key component of health services within stroke care. Ongoing challenges exist as to how to best capture outcomes for these services, especially considering the multi-faceted service delivery and flexible focus on individual need. A goal setting tool, such as the multidisciplinary goal attainment measurement (MGAM), may be useful to objectively measure client outcomes that are meaningful and relevant to individuals within this complex environment. This study aims to review MGAM client outcomes within a stroke population in a community rehabilitation context. Methods: Pre and post goal outcome data was collected by multidisciplinary team members with stroke survivors, across the domains of impairment, activity/participation, and knowledge/information. These pre and post scores were compared with each other, as well as a measure of everyday functioning. Results: Clinically significant average change scores and statistically significant changes pre and post intervention were found across all domains on the MGAM. There were no correlations noted between MGAM and length of stay, quality of life and everyday functioning outcomes. Conclusion: As evidenced in the stroke population of this study, MGAM offers a unique outcome measure different to other clinical measures as it captures client outcomes that are relevant and meaningful to individual need across a range of domains within a multi-disciplinary setting. These formalized goal setting practices and outcomes, such as the MGAM, may assist in providing standardized outcome processes across various community rehabilitation settings.","PeriodicalId":91676,"journal":{"name":"Edorium journal of disability and rehabilitation","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Edorium journal of disability and rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5348/100051d05ab2021ra","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Community rehabilitation is a key component of health services within stroke care. Ongoing challenges exist as to how to best capture outcomes for these services, especially considering the multi-faceted service delivery and flexible focus on individual need. A goal setting tool, such as the multidisciplinary goal attainment measurement (MGAM), may be useful to objectively measure client outcomes that are meaningful and relevant to individuals within this complex environment. This study aims to review MGAM client outcomes within a stroke population in a community rehabilitation context. Methods: Pre and post goal outcome data was collected by multidisciplinary team members with stroke survivors, across the domains of impairment, activity/participation, and knowledge/information. These pre and post scores were compared with each other, as well as a measure of everyday functioning. Results: Clinically significant average change scores and statistically significant changes pre and post intervention were found across all domains on the MGAM. There were no correlations noted between MGAM and length of stay, quality of life and everyday functioning outcomes. Conclusion: As evidenced in the stroke population of this study, MGAM offers a unique outcome measure different to other clinical measures as it captures client outcomes that are relevant and meaningful to individual need across a range of domains within a multi-disciplinary setting. These formalized goal setting practices and outcomes, such as the MGAM, may assist in providing standardized outcome processes across various community rehabilitation settings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多学科目标实现测量(MGAM):在澳大利亚昆士兰州布里斯班的社区康复环境中卒中客户目标为基础的结果综述
目的:社区康复是卒中护理卫生服务的关键组成部分。在如何最好地获取这些服务的成果方面存在着持续的挑战,特别是考虑到多方面的服务提供和对个人需求的灵活关注。目标设定工具,如多学科目标实现测量(MGAM),可能有助于客观地测量在这种复杂环境中对个人有意义和相关的客户结果。本研究旨在回顾在社区康复背景下卒中人群的MGAM客户结果。方法:多学科团队成员收集卒中幸存者目标前和目标后的结果数据,涉及损伤、活动/参与和知识/信息领域。这些前后得分相互比较,以及日常功能的衡量标准。结果:干预前和干预后MGAM各领域的平均变化得分均有临床意义和统计学意义的变化。MGAM与住院时间、生活质量和日常功能结果之间没有相关性。结论:正如在本研究的卒中人群中所证明的那样,MGAM提供了一种独特的结果测量方法,不同于其他临床测量方法,因为它捕获了与多学科环境中一系列领域的个人需求相关且有意义的客户结果。这些正式的目标设定实践和结果,如MGAM,可能有助于在各种社区康复环境中提供标准化的结果过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Rehabilitation of a patient with spinal cord lesion due to surgical removal of the spinal tumor with chronic idiopathic demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP): A case report Swallowing difficulties among traumatic brain injury patients in Bangladesh Activation of middle and lower trapezius and strengthening of serratus anterior muscle for the rehabilitation of a patient with chronic lateral epicondylalgia: A case report Evidence-based physiotherapy management of fall prevention for the patient with Alzheimer disease: A case-based study The effect of anger expression and perceived injustice on the formation of a beneficial therapeutic alliance in chronic pain management: A systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1