The influence of parents’ information processing on childhood vaccine acceptance after a vaccine crisis in China

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Health Risk & Society Pub Date : 2019-05-22 DOI:10.1080/13698575.2019.1619672
Jing Yan, Jiuchang Wei, Z. Ouyang, A. Vinnikova, Dingtao Zhao, Haibo Zhang
{"title":"The influence of parents’ information processing on childhood vaccine acceptance after a vaccine crisis in China","authors":"Jing Yan, Jiuchang Wei, Z. Ouyang, A. Vinnikova, Dingtao Zhao, Haibo Zhang","doi":"10.1080/13698575.2019.1619672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Drawing upon the protective action decision model and the heuristic-systematic model, this study investigated the determinants of parents’ response to the 2016 vaccine crisis in Shandong Province, China. A survey was conducted from Anhui Province (N = 456). The findings showed that both perceived vaccine knowledge and perceptions of risk from the vaccine crisis were vital in predicting parents’ information insufficiency (the perceived discrepancy between actual and desired levels of vaccine knowledge), information seeking, information processing (where parents make a judgement about information validity), and their intentions towards childhood vaccination. In addition, information insufficiency and information seeking also significantly facilitated parents’ information processing. When parents described processing information systematically, they were more likely to accept childhood vaccination. On the other hand, seeking more information about the crisis did not influence reported childhood vaccination practices. Implications and suggestions for health-related crisis communication research are discussed.","PeriodicalId":47341,"journal":{"name":"Health Risk & Society","volume":"29 1","pages":"284 - 303"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Risk & Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13698575.2019.1619672","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Drawing upon the protective action decision model and the heuristic-systematic model, this study investigated the determinants of parents’ response to the 2016 vaccine crisis in Shandong Province, China. A survey was conducted from Anhui Province (N = 456). The findings showed that both perceived vaccine knowledge and perceptions of risk from the vaccine crisis were vital in predicting parents’ information insufficiency (the perceived discrepancy between actual and desired levels of vaccine knowledge), information seeking, information processing (where parents make a judgement about information validity), and their intentions towards childhood vaccination. In addition, information insufficiency and information seeking also significantly facilitated parents’ information processing. When parents described processing information systematically, they were more likely to accept childhood vaccination. On the other hand, seeking more information about the crisis did not influence reported childhood vaccination practices. Implications and suggestions for health-related crisis communication research are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
疫苗危机后父母信息处理对儿童疫苗接受的影响
利用保护行为决策模型和启发式系统模型,研究了2016年山东省疫苗危机中家长应对的决定因素。调查来自安徽省(N = 456)。研究结果表明,感知到的疫苗知识和对疫苗危机风险的感知对于预测父母的信息不足(疫苗知识的实际水平与期望水平之间的感知差异)、信息寻求、信息处理(父母对信息有效性做出判断)以及他们对儿童接种疫苗的意图至关重要。此外,信息不足和信息寻求也显著促进了家长的信息处理。当父母描述系统地处理信息时,他们更有可能接受儿童接种疫苗。另一方面,寻求有关危机的更多信息并不影响报告的儿童疫苗接种做法。讨论了与健康相关的危机沟通研究的意义和建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Health Risk & Society is an international scholarly journal devoted to a theoretical and empirical understanding of the social processes which influence the ways in which health risks are taken, communicated, assessed and managed. Public awareness of risk is associated with the development of high profile media debates about specific risks. Although risk issues arise in a variety of areas, such as technological usage and the environment, they are particularly evident in health. Not only is health a major issue of personal and collective concern, but failure to effectively assess and manage risk is likely to result in health problems.
期刊最新文献
Risk factors for mental health and wellness: children’s perspectives from five Majority World Countries The role of trust in government and risk perception in adherence to COVID-19 prevention measures: survey findings among young people in Luxembourg Reassessing social trust: gossip, self-policing, and Covid-19 risk communication in Norway Organisational learning, or organised irresponsibility? Risk, opacity and lesson learning about mental health related deaths The “risk object” of cannabis edibles: perspectives from young adults in Canada
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1