The “risk object” of cannabis edibles: perspectives from young adults in Canada

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Health Risk & Society Pub Date : 2023-04-02 DOI:10.1080/13698575.2023.2198558
Charlene Elliott, M. Ventresca, Emily Truman
{"title":"The “risk object” of cannabis edibles: perspectives from young adults in Canada","authors":"Charlene Elliott, M. Ventresca, Emily Truman","doi":"10.1080/13698575.2023.2198558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Young adults are the most prominent users of cannabis in Canada, which was legalised for recreational use in 2018. Edibles are a highly popular form of cannabis delivery for this age group, yet little qualitative research explores young adult perspectives on edibles, including how edibles function socially for them, or are viewed in terms of risk. This study fills this research gap, conducting focus groups with 57 young adults (ages-18–24) in Calgary, Alberta, Canada to explore the ‘risk object’ of cannabis edibles. Findings reveal that delivery mechanism of cannabis – that is, cannabis in food form compared to smoked/inhaled – significantly shifts perceptions of risk by young adults. Edibles were viewed as less risky than smoking cannabis, and participants stated they were more willing to consume edibles than in any other form (and especially in social settings). Risks associated with edibles were primarily short-term/related to over-consumption and were largely mitigated by legalisation. However, participants also emphasised risks for others (including children and inexperienced consumers). Overall, the ‘risk object’ of cannabis edibles shifts depending on the audience considered. Participants described individual consumers as shouldering primary responsibility for managing risks related to cannabis edibles, despite manufacturer and government roles in regulating product quality and protecting vulnerable populations.","PeriodicalId":47341,"journal":{"name":"Health Risk & Society","volume":"96 1","pages":"252 - 267"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Risk & Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13698575.2023.2198558","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Young adults are the most prominent users of cannabis in Canada, which was legalised for recreational use in 2018. Edibles are a highly popular form of cannabis delivery for this age group, yet little qualitative research explores young adult perspectives on edibles, including how edibles function socially for them, or are viewed in terms of risk. This study fills this research gap, conducting focus groups with 57 young adults (ages-18–24) in Calgary, Alberta, Canada to explore the ‘risk object’ of cannabis edibles. Findings reveal that delivery mechanism of cannabis – that is, cannabis in food form compared to smoked/inhaled – significantly shifts perceptions of risk by young adults. Edibles were viewed as less risky than smoking cannabis, and participants stated they were more willing to consume edibles than in any other form (and especially in social settings). Risks associated with edibles were primarily short-term/related to over-consumption and were largely mitigated by legalisation. However, participants also emphasised risks for others (including children and inexperienced consumers). Overall, the ‘risk object’ of cannabis edibles shifts depending on the audience considered. Participants described individual consumers as shouldering primary responsibility for managing risks related to cannabis edibles, despite manufacturer and government roles in regulating product quality and protecting vulnerable populations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大麻食品的“风险对象”:来自加拿大年轻人的观点
在加拿大,年轻人是大麻的主要使用者,2018年,加拿大将大麻用于娱乐用途合法化。在这一年龄组中,食用大麻是一种非常受欢迎的形式,但很少有定性研究探讨年轻人对食用大麻的看法,包括食用大麻对他们的社会作用,或在风险方面的看法。这项研究填补了这一研究空白,在加拿大阿尔伯塔省卡尔加里对57名年轻人(18 - 24岁)进行了焦点小组调查,以探索大麻食品的“风险对象”。研究结果表明,大麻的输送机制——即与吸食/吸入的大麻相比,以食物形式存在的大麻——显著改变了年轻人对风险的认知。食用食品被认为比吸食大麻风险更小,参与者表示,他们更愿意食用任何其他形式的食品(尤其是在社交场合)。与可食用食品相关的风险主要是短期的/与过度消费有关,并通过合法化在很大程度上减轻了风险。然而,参与者也强调了其他人(包括儿童和没有经验的消费者)的风险。总体而言,大麻食品的“风险对象”根据所考虑的受众而变化。与会者说,尽管制造商和政府在规范产品质量和保护弱势群体方面发挥作用,但个人消费者对管理与大麻食用物有关的风险负有主要责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Health Risk & Society is an international scholarly journal devoted to a theoretical and empirical understanding of the social processes which influence the ways in which health risks are taken, communicated, assessed and managed. Public awareness of risk is associated with the development of high profile media debates about specific risks. Although risk issues arise in a variety of areas, such as technological usage and the environment, they are particularly evident in health. Not only is health a major issue of personal and collective concern, but failure to effectively assess and manage risk is likely to result in health problems.
期刊最新文献
Risk factors for mental health and wellness: children’s perspectives from five Majority World Countries The role of trust in government and risk perception in adherence to COVID-19 prevention measures: survey findings among young people in Luxembourg Reassessing social trust: gossip, self-policing, and Covid-19 risk communication in Norway Organisational learning, or organised irresponsibility? Risk, opacity and lesson learning about mental health related deaths The “risk object” of cannabis edibles: perspectives from young adults in Canada
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1