Optimal mechanism in governmental project screening: A theory of Kornai's soft budget constraint

Chong-en Bai , Yijiang Wang
{"title":"Optimal mechanism in governmental project screening: A theory of Kornai's soft budget constraint","authors":"Chong-en Bai ,&nbsp;Yijiang Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.jge.2022.100049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Soft budget constraint refers to the phenomenon that money losing inefficient projects keep on getting subsidies and operating. It was first phrased and analyzed by the late Hungarian economist Janos Kornai when he studied former socialist economies and by now, economists generally have agreed that soft budget constraint also exists extensively in market economies. As an important area of research in government and economics, existing explanations of soft budget have focused on the government's lack of commitment to terminate inefficient investment projects. In this paper, we propose a new theory in which soft budget constraint is an optimal governmental mechanism to induce greater effort in project selection. The idea is that if a manager (banker) selects a bad project, he has to keep on subsidizing it and lose more. Anticipating this, soft budget constraint makes the manager work hard to avoid choosing bad projects. Our theory sheds light on research in government and economics from the perspective of mechanism design.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100785,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Government and Economics","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100049"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667319322000209/pdfft?md5=23f7df2add680737836fcae1cf9bb43d&pid=1-s2.0-S2667319322000209-main.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Government and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667319322000209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Soft budget constraint refers to the phenomenon that money losing inefficient projects keep on getting subsidies and operating. It was first phrased and analyzed by the late Hungarian economist Janos Kornai when he studied former socialist economies and by now, economists generally have agreed that soft budget constraint also exists extensively in market economies. As an important area of research in government and economics, existing explanations of soft budget have focused on the government's lack of commitment to terminate inefficient investment projects. In this paper, we propose a new theory in which soft budget constraint is an optimal governmental mechanism to induce greater effort in project selection. The idea is that if a manager (banker) selects a bad project, he has to keep on subsidizing it and lose more. Anticipating this, soft budget constraint makes the manager work hard to avoid choosing bad projects. Our theory sheds light on research in government and economics from the perspective of mechanism design.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
政府项目筛选的最优机制:科尔奈软预算约束理论
预算软约束是指资金亏损的低效项目继续获得补贴并继续运营的现象。这是已故匈牙利经济学家Janos Kornai在研究前社会主义经济时首先提出和分析的,到目前为止,经济学家普遍认为软预算约束在市场经济中也广泛存在。软预算是政府和经济学的一个重要研究领域,对软预算的现有解释主要集中在政府缺乏终止低效投资项目的承诺。本文提出了一种新的理论,认为软预算约束是促使政府在项目选择中做出更大努力的最优机制。其理念是,如果一位经理(银行家)选择了一个糟糕的项目,他必须继续资助它,然后损失更多。预见到这一点,软预算约束使管理者努力避免选择不好的项目。我们的理论从机制设计的角度为政府和经济学的研究提供了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board The contributions of foreign aid and natural resource wealth to democratic institutions: Evidence from over 40 years of sub-Sahara Africa's history Editor's note: Market-preserving government, global value chains, trade remedies, center-state transfers, and foreign aid. The nature of market-preserving government Trade remedy measures and their effects on industry performance, and implicit government intentions: Changes in revealed comparative advantage indices in China, India, and Japan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1