Exploring the role of social proof of credibility and usability for internet banking adoption through media networks

{"title":"Exploring the role of social proof of credibility and usability for internet banking adoption through media networks","authors":"","doi":"10.4018/ijebr.290057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Present study has offered two theoretical models which may helpful to understand the importance of social proof during internet banking (IB) adoption. The existing technology adoption model such as TAM has ignored the importance of social proof of credibility such as risk, security, and privacy. People are actively involved to take recommendations from close sources, experts, customers, and crowd opinion using social media platforms (SMPs). The purpose to gather information is to save from risk, security, and privacy issues especially when customers must share their personal and financial information during IB. It has found that conventional banks have positive word of mouth, recommendations, and reviews therefore the number of IB customers, profitability, and growth is high compared to Islamic banks. Conversely, SMPs have more negative word of mouth and stories which creates social proof regarding the uncertainty and risk in IB adoption. Findings highlights that people have social trust, confidence, and believe in their close sources and conventional banks.","PeriodicalId":13628,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. E Bus. Res.","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. E Bus. Res.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/ijebr.290057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Present study has offered two theoretical models which may helpful to understand the importance of social proof during internet banking (IB) adoption. The existing technology adoption model such as TAM has ignored the importance of social proof of credibility such as risk, security, and privacy. People are actively involved to take recommendations from close sources, experts, customers, and crowd opinion using social media platforms (SMPs). The purpose to gather information is to save from risk, security, and privacy issues especially when customers must share their personal and financial information during IB. It has found that conventional banks have positive word of mouth, recommendations, and reviews therefore the number of IB customers, profitability, and growth is high compared to Islamic banks. Conversely, SMPs have more negative word of mouth and stories which creates social proof regarding the uncertainty and risk in IB adoption. Findings highlights that people have social trust, confidence, and believe in their close sources and conventional banks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过媒体网络探索可信性和可用性的社会证明对互联网银行采用的作用
本研究提供了两个理论模型,可能有助于理解社会认同在网上银行(IB)采用中的重要性。现有的技术采用模型(如TAM)忽略了风险、安全和隐私等可信性的社会证明的重要性。人们积极参与,通过社交媒体平台(SMPs)从密切的消息来源、专家、客户和大众意见中获得建议。收集信息的目的是为了避免风险、安全和隐私问题,特别是当客户在IB期间必须分享他们的个人和财务信息时。它发现,传统银行有积极的口碑、推荐和评价,因此,与伊斯兰银行相比,IB客户的数量、盈利能力和增长都很高。相反,smp有更多负面的口碑和故事,这就产生了关于IB采用的不确定性和风险的社会证明。调查结果强调,人们对社会有信任,有信心,并相信他们的亲密来源和传统银行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Factors Affecting Continuance Intention of M-Government: An Empirical Study Personality and Psychological Predictors of Instagram Personalized Ad Avoidance E-Business Career Opportunities and Implications for Fresh University Graduates in Pakistan A Study of Customer Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence Technology Factors Influencing the Usage of E-Business to Improve SME Performance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1