Liposomal Amphotericin-B Infusion-related Reactions and Rate of Infusions: A Single Center Cohort Study

Iouri Banakh, Qiantong Hua, J. Metcalfe
{"title":"Liposomal Amphotericin-B Infusion-related Reactions and Rate of Infusions: A Single Center Cohort Study","authors":"Iouri Banakh, Qiantong Hua, J. Metcalfe","doi":"10.5799/jmid.1218636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Liposomal amphotericin B is a broad-spectrum antifungal treatment used for life-threatening infections, but it commonly induces infusion-related adverse events that may prevent treatment completion. Based on anecdotal evidence, a slow infusion guideline at treatment initiation has been suggested to reduce these reactions. This study aimed to determine if slowing down the infusion rate on treatment initiation would reduce the rate of infusion-related adverse events. \nMethods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted examining the primary outcome of adverse event rates between patients who received slow and standard (2-hour or faster) infusions at a major hospital in Australia. Secondary outcomes were risk factors associated with infusion reactions. The rates of adverse events were analyzed using Fisher’s exact test. \nResults: An 8-year audit identified 47 patients who were administered liposomal amphotericin-B. The average age of the study population was 61.7 years and 28 (59.6%) were male patients. Slower than standard infusions were given to 5 (10.6%) patients on treatment initiation. Infusion-related adverse events occurred in 2 (40.0%) patients with reduced rates and 5 (11.9%) patients with standard infusion rates (p=0.154). Typical reactions were myalgia, dyspnoea, and flushing. Four patients with adverse events had been rechallenged after further rate reductions and prophylactic medications with the completion of treatment. No risk factors for adverse events were identified among demographics, comorbidities, or co-prescribed medications. \nConclusion: Slowing the infusion rate of liposomal amphotericin-B administration does not appear to reduce the likelihood of infusion-related reactions, however, it can be trialed for adverse-event management. J Microbiol Infect Dis 2022; 12(4): 148-153.","PeriodicalId":16603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases","volume":"467 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5799/jmid.1218636","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Liposomal amphotericin B is a broad-spectrum antifungal treatment used for life-threatening infections, but it commonly induces infusion-related adverse events that may prevent treatment completion. Based on anecdotal evidence, a slow infusion guideline at treatment initiation has been suggested to reduce these reactions. This study aimed to determine if slowing down the infusion rate on treatment initiation would reduce the rate of infusion-related adverse events. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted examining the primary outcome of adverse event rates between patients who received slow and standard (2-hour or faster) infusions at a major hospital in Australia. Secondary outcomes were risk factors associated with infusion reactions. The rates of adverse events were analyzed using Fisher’s exact test. Results: An 8-year audit identified 47 patients who were administered liposomal amphotericin-B. The average age of the study population was 61.7 years and 28 (59.6%) were male patients. Slower than standard infusions were given to 5 (10.6%) patients on treatment initiation. Infusion-related adverse events occurred in 2 (40.0%) patients with reduced rates and 5 (11.9%) patients with standard infusion rates (p=0.154). Typical reactions were myalgia, dyspnoea, and flushing. Four patients with adverse events had been rechallenged after further rate reductions and prophylactic medications with the completion of treatment. No risk factors for adverse events were identified among demographics, comorbidities, or co-prescribed medications. Conclusion: Slowing the infusion rate of liposomal amphotericin-B administration does not appear to reduce the likelihood of infusion-related reactions, however, it can be trialed for adverse-event management. J Microbiol Infect Dis 2022; 12(4): 148-153.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两性霉素b输注脂质体相关反应和输注率:单中心队列研究
目的:两性霉素B脂质体是一种广谱抗真菌药物,用于治疗危及生命的感染,但它通常会引起与输注相关的不良事件,可能会阻止治疗的完成。根据传闻证据,建议在治疗开始时采用缓慢输注指南来减少这些反应。本研究旨在确定在治疗开始时减慢输注速度是否会降低输注相关不良事件的发生率。方法:在澳大利亚的一家大医院进行了一项回顾性队列研究,研究了接受慢速输注和标准输注(2小时或更快)患者不良事件发生率的主要结局。次要结局是与输液反应相关的危险因素。不良事件发生率采用Fisher精确检验分析。结果:一项为期8年的审计确定了47例使用两性霉素- b脂质体的患者。研究人群的平均年龄为61.7岁,男性患者28例(59.6%)。在治疗开始时给予比标准输液慢的患者5例(10.6%)。降低输注率的2例(40.0%)患者和标准输注率的5例(11.9%)患者发生了输注相关不良事件(p=0.154)。典型的反应是肌痛、呼吸困难和潮红。4名不良事件患者在治疗完成后,在进一步降低发生率和预防性药物治疗后再次受到挑战。在人口统计学、合并症或合用药物中未发现不良事件的危险因素。结论:减慢两性霉素- b脂质体输注速度似乎不会降低输注相关反应的可能性,但可以用于不良事件管理的试验。中华微生物学杂志[J];12(4): 148 - 153。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Role of miRNAs in Immune Regulation And Bacterial Infections Effect of Sodium Hypochlorite on Biofilm-Producing Organisms Isolated from A Hospital Drinking Water Assessment of Quantity and Quality of Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis DNA Extracts Stored at Different Temperatures Characterization of SP-T1 Phage for Potential Biological Control of Salmonella Enteritidis The Effect Of Corticosteroid Therapy on the Frequency of Secondary Bacterial Infections And Mortality in COVID-19 Patients in ICU
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1