PREDICTION OF STEM WEIGHT IN SELECTED ALFALFA VARIETIES BY ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS, MULTIVARIATE ADAPTIVE REGRESSION SPLINES AND MULTIPLE REGRESSION ANALYSIS

Ş. Çelik, E. Çaçan, S. Yaryab
{"title":"PREDICTION OF STEM WEIGHT IN SELECTED ALFALFA VARIETIES BY ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS, MULTIVARIATE ADAPTIVE REGRESSION SPLINES AND MULTIPLE REGRESSION ANALYSIS","authors":"Ş. Çelik, E. Çaçan, S. Yaryab","doi":"10.36899/japs.2023.4.0694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, artificial neural networks (ANNs), Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines (MARS) algorithm and multiple regression analysis (MLR) were used for plant stem weight prediction. Stem length, stem diameter, number of lateral branch, branch length, leaf number, stipule length and distance between stipules have been selected as input variables in these mentioned methods. A total of 150 plants were examined. Fifty plants from each of Gea, Bilensoy and Basbag alfalfa cultivars were analyzed separately. Our alfalfa varieties in this study are Gea, Bilensoy and Başbağ. In the ANN method, 70% of the data were allocated for training 20% for validation and 10% for testing. ANN training data were used in MARS algorithm and MLR. To measure which models can predict better, the coefficient of determination (R 2 ) and mean square error (MSE) were compared each other. Correlation coefficients (r) of ANN, MARS and MLR in Stem Weight estimation were 0.801, 0.999 and 0.753 for Gea clover variety, respectively; 0.864, 0.997 and 0.711 for Bilensoy variety, respectively, and 0.781, 0.998 and 0561 for the Basbag variety, respectively. In the same models, R 2 was 0.642, 0.998 and 0.567 for the Gea variety, respectively, 0.746, 0.994 and 0.505 for the Bilensoy variety, respectively, and 0.610, 0.997 and 0.315 for the Basbag variety, respectively. MSE values were 0.023, 0.008 and 2.498 for the Gea variety, respectively, 0.113, 0.014 and 1.409 for the Bilensoy variety, respectively, and 0.151, 0.017 and 4.641 for the Basbag variety, respectively. According to these criteria, the MARS algorithm provides a more realistic prediction than ANNs and MLR. The order of used algorithms in obtaining better prediction results in stem weight estimation in alfalfa plants was MARS> ANN> MLR.","PeriodicalId":8656,"journal":{"name":"August 1985","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"August 1985","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36899/japs.2023.4.0694","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this study, artificial neural networks (ANNs), Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines (MARS) algorithm and multiple regression analysis (MLR) were used for plant stem weight prediction. Stem length, stem diameter, number of lateral branch, branch length, leaf number, stipule length and distance between stipules have been selected as input variables in these mentioned methods. A total of 150 plants were examined. Fifty plants from each of Gea, Bilensoy and Basbag alfalfa cultivars were analyzed separately. Our alfalfa varieties in this study are Gea, Bilensoy and Başbağ. In the ANN method, 70% of the data were allocated for training 20% for validation and 10% for testing. ANN training data were used in MARS algorithm and MLR. To measure which models can predict better, the coefficient of determination (R 2 ) and mean square error (MSE) were compared each other. Correlation coefficients (r) of ANN, MARS and MLR in Stem Weight estimation were 0.801, 0.999 and 0.753 for Gea clover variety, respectively; 0.864, 0.997 and 0.711 for Bilensoy variety, respectively, and 0.781, 0.998 and 0561 for the Basbag variety, respectively. In the same models, R 2 was 0.642, 0.998 and 0.567 for the Gea variety, respectively, 0.746, 0.994 and 0.505 for the Bilensoy variety, respectively, and 0.610, 0.997 and 0.315 for the Basbag variety, respectively. MSE values were 0.023, 0.008 and 2.498 for the Gea variety, respectively, 0.113, 0.014 and 1.409 for the Bilensoy variety, respectively, and 0.151, 0.017 and 4.641 for the Basbag variety, respectively. According to these criteria, the MARS algorithm provides a more realistic prediction than ANNs and MLR. The order of used algorithms in obtaining better prediction results in stem weight estimation in alfalfa plants was MARS> ANN> MLR.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应用人工神经网络、多元自适应样条和多元回归分析预测苜蓿品种茎重
本研究采用人工神经网络(ANNs)、多元自适应样条回归(MARS)算法和多元回归分析(MLR)对植物茎重进行预测。在这些方法中,茎长、茎粗、侧枝数、枝长、叶数、托叶长和托叶之间的距离作为输入变量。共检查了150种植物。分别对Gea、Bilensoy和Basbag苜蓿品种各50株进行了分析。本研究的紫花苜蓿品种为Gea、Bilensoy和ba baul。在人工神经网络方法中,分配70%的数据用于训练,20%用于验证,10%用于测试。将人工神经网络训练数据用于MARS算法和MLR。为了衡量哪些模型可以更好地预测,决定系数(r2)和均方误差(MSE)相互比较。三叶草品种茎重估算的ANN、MARS和MLR相关系数(r)分别为0.801、0.999和0.753;Bilensoy品种分别为0.864、0.997和0.711,Basbag品种分别为0.781、0.998和0561。在同一模型中,Gea品种的r2分别为0.642、0.998和0.567,Bilensoy品种的r2分别为0.746、0.994和0.505,Basbag品种的r2分别为0.610、0.997和0.315。Gea品种的MSE分别为0.023、0.008和2.498,Bilensoy品种的MSE分别为0.113、0.014和1.409,Basbag品种的MSE分别为0.151、0.017和4.641。根据这些标准,MARS算法提供了比ann和MLR更真实的预测。在紫花苜蓿茎重估计中,获得较好预测结果的算法顺序为MARS> ANN> MLR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ASTRAGALOSIDE-IV INHIBITS TIBIAL DYSCHONDROPLASIA VIA PI3K/AKT /HIF-1α SIGNALING IN CHICKENS ASSESSMENT OF DAMAGE AND BIOCONTROL AGENTS OF FALL ARMYWORM SPODOPTERA FRUGIPERDA (JE SMITH, 1797) (LEPIDOPTERA, NOCTUIDAE) ON MAIZE IN SOUTHERN OF BENIN REPUBLIC NEW RECORD OF CESTODE GENUS DILEPIS WENILAND, 1858 IN AVIAN HOST LITTLE CORMORANT, MICROCARBO NIGER (AVES: PHALACROCORACIDAE) OF DISTRICT KAMBER-SHAHDADKOT, SINDH PROVINCE, PAKISTAN. ASSESSMENT OF STABILITY PARAMETERS FOR MULTIPLE TRAITS IN NEWLY DEVELOPED SINGLE CROSS HYBRIDS OF MAIZE (Zea mays L.) EVALUATION OF HAEMATOBIOCHEMICAL AND CARDIOPULMONARY PARAMETERS IN GOATS UNDERGOING ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY USING TOTAL INTRAVENOUS ANAESTHESIA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1