Strength and deformability of different types of geosynthetic barriers

A. Prosviryakov, M. Sainov, A. Zverev, R. Lukichev
{"title":"Strength and deformability of different types of geosynthetic barriers","authors":"A. Prosviryakov, M. Sainov, A. Zverev, R. Lukichev","doi":"10.22227/2305-5502.2020.2.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Water engineering facilities utilize geosynthetic barriers of various materials, but the most common are polyvinylchloride (PVC) and polyethylene (PE) considered to be the most efficient. However, the utilization of thermoset geosynthetics (PVC and PE) as watertight elements of the geosynthetic barriers of earth dams has also a number of drawbacks. In the course of time, PVC can lose its properties due to plasticizer loss, whereas PE is susceptible to cracking at thermal impacts. That is why it is necessary to consider geosynthetic barriers of other types as alternatives. For this purpose, we studied the deformability and the strength of geosynthetic barriers of thermoset material (chlorosulfonated polyethylene — CSPE), as well as of a rubber-type synthetic material (ethylene-propylene diene monomer — EPDM).\n\nMaterials and methods. Sample testing of geosynthetic barrier materials for monoaxial extension was conducted by means of a tensile-testing machine, which records during the experiment the changes of the tensile force and the longitudinal extension. The changes of the cross-section area of the samples were measured by means of a digital side caliper.\n\nResults. It was determined that of the considered geosynthetic barrier types (PE, PVC, CSPE and EPDM) the strongest one is the reinforced CSPE type and the most deformable is the EPDM barrier. Reinforced CSPE geosynthetic barrier has a tensile strength above 100 MPa, it is approximately 5 times higher than that of PVC and PE barriers. By deformability, reinforced CSPE barrier is similar to PE barriers. An EPDM geosynthetic barrier has the linear deformation modulus around 1 MPa, it is capable of a multiple extension without loss of strength.\n\nConclusions. By strength vs. deformability ratio, EPDM geosynthetic barriers can compete with PVC barriers.","PeriodicalId":30543,"journal":{"name":"Stroitel''stvo Nauka i Obrazovanie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroitel''stvo Nauka i Obrazovanie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22227/2305-5502.2020.2.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. Water engineering facilities utilize geosynthetic barriers of various materials, but the most common are polyvinylchloride (PVC) and polyethylene (PE) considered to be the most efficient. However, the utilization of thermoset geosynthetics (PVC and PE) as watertight elements of the geosynthetic barriers of earth dams has also a number of drawbacks. In the course of time, PVC can lose its properties due to plasticizer loss, whereas PE is susceptible to cracking at thermal impacts. That is why it is necessary to consider geosynthetic barriers of other types as alternatives. For this purpose, we studied the deformability and the strength of geosynthetic barriers of thermoset material (chlorosulfonated polyethylene — CSPE), as well as of a rubber-type synthetic material (ethylene-propylene diene monomer — EPDM). Materials and methods. Sample testing of geosynthetic barrier materials for monoaxial extension was conducted by means of a tensile-testing machine, which records during the experiment the changes of the tensile force and the longitudinal extension. The changes of the cross-section area of the samples were measured by means of a digital side caliper. Results. It was determined that of the considered geosynthetic barrier types (PE, PVC, CSPE and EPDM) the strongest one is the reinforced CSPE type and the most deformable is the EPDM barrier. Reinforced CSPE geosynthetic barrier has a tensile strength above 100 MPa, it is approximately 5 times higher than that of PVC and PE barriers. By deformability, reinforced CSPE barrier is similar to PE barriers. An EPDM geosynthetic barrier has the linear deformation modulus around 1 MPa, it is capable of a multiple extension without loss of strength. Conclusions. By strength vs. deformability ratio, EPDM geosynthetic barriers can compete with PVC barriers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同类型土工合成屏障的强度和变形能力
介绍。水利工程设施利用各种材料的土工合成屏障,但最常见的是聚氯乙烯(PVC)和聚乙烯(PE),被认为是最有效的。然而,利用热固性土工合成材料(PVC和PE)作为土工合成屏障的水密元件也有一些缺点。随着时间的推移,PVC会因增塑剂的损失而失去其性能,而PE在热冲击下容易开裂。这就是为什么有必要考虑其他类型的土工合成屏障作为替代品。为此,我们研究了热固性材料(氯磺化聚乙烯- CSPE)以及橡胶型合成材料(乙烯-丙二烯单体- EPDM)的土工合成屏障的变形能力和强度。材料和方法。利用拉伸试验机对土工合成屏障材料进行了单轴拉伸试样试验,记录了试验过程中拉伸力和纵向拉伸的变化情况。用数字式侧卡尺测量了试样的横截面积变化。结果表明,在土工合成屏障类型(PE、PVC、CSPE和EPDM)中,强度最大的是增强CSPE,变形最大的是EPDM屏障。增强CSPE土工合成屏障的抗拉强度在100 MPa以上,是PVC和PE屏障的5倍左右。从变形能力来看,增强CSPE屏障与PE屏障相似。EPDM土工合成屏障的线性变形模量在1 MPa左右,能够在不损失强度的情况下进行多次拉伸。根据强度与变形比,EPDM土工合成屏障可以与PVC屏障竞争。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Heat consumption for temporary heating of underground stations under construction Application of data analytics methods to assess the prospectivity of planned real estate developments Methods of structural analysis for resistance to progressive collapse Flash floods impact on the construction of rainwater harvesting structures Shaping of buildings based on rod arches with variable geometry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1