Telehealth as a Means of Enabling Health Equity

C. Kuziemsky, Inga M. Hunter, Jai Ganesh Udayasankaran, P. Ranatunga, G. Kulatunga, S. John, Oommen John, José F FlÓrez-Arango, Marcia Ito, K. Ho, Shahi B Gogia, Kleber Araujo, V. Rajput, Wouter Meijer, Arindam Basu
{"title":"Telehealth as a Means of Enabling Health Equity","authors":"C. Kuziemsky, Inga M. Hunter, Jai Ganesh Udayasankaran, P. Ranatunga, G. Kulatunga, S. John, Oommen John, José F FlÓrez-Arango, Marcia Ito, K. Ho, Shahi B Gogia, Kleber Araujo, V. Rajput, Wouter Meijer, Arindam Basu","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1742500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary Objective : The goal of this paper is to provide a consensus review on telehealth delivery prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic to develop a set of recommendations for designing telehealth services and tools that contribute to system resilience and equitable health. Methods : The IMIA-Telehealth Working Group (WG) members conducted a two-step approach to understand the role of telehealth in enabling global health equity. We first conducted a consensus review on the topic followed by a modified Delphi process to respond to four questions related to the role telehealth can play in developing a resilient and equitable health system. Results : Fifteen WG members from eight countries participated in the Delphi process to share their views. The experts agreed that while telehealth services before and during COVID-19 pandemic have enhanced the delivery of and access to healthcare services, they were also concerned that global telehealth delivery has not been equal for everyone. The group came to a consensus that health system concepts including technology, financing, access to medical supplies and equipment, and governance capacity can all impact the delivery of telehealth services. Conclusion : Telehealth played a significant role in delivering healthcare services during the pandemic. However, telehealth delivery has also led to unintended consequences (UICs) including inequity issues and an increase in the digital divide. Telehealth practitioners, professionals and system designers therefore need to purposely design for equity as part of achieving broader health system goals.","PeriodicalId":40027,"journal":{"name":"Yearbook of medical informatics","volume":"20 1","pages":"60 - 66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yearbook of medical informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1742500","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Summary Objective : The goal of this paper is to provide a consensus review on telehealth delivery prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic to develop a set of recommendations for designing telehealth services and tools that contribute to system resilience and equitable health. Methods : The IMIA-Telehealth Working Group (WG) members conducted a two-step approach to understand the role of telehealth in enabling global health equity. We first conducted a consensus review on the topic followed by a modified Delphi process to respond to four questions related to the role telehealth can play in developing a resilient and equitable health system. Results : Fifteen WG members from eight countries participated in the Delphi process to share their views. The experts agreed that while telehealth services before and during COVID-19 pandemic have enhanced the delivery of and access to healthcare services, they were also concerned that global telehealth delivery has not been equal for everyone. The group came to a consensus that health system concepts including technology, financing, access to medical supplies and equipment, and governance capacity can all impact the delivery of telehealth services. Conclusion : Telehealth played a significant role in delivering healthcare services during the pandemic. However, telehealth delivery has also led to unintended consequences (UICs) including inequity issues and an increase in the digital divide. Telehealth practitioners, professionals and system designers therefore need to purposely design for equity as part of achieving broader health system goals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
远程保健是促进保健公平的一种手段
摘要目的:本文的目标是在COVID-19大流行之前和期间就远程医疗服务提供提供共识审查,以制定一套有助于系统复原力和公平卫生的远程医疗服务和工具设计建议。方法:imia -远程医疗工作组(WG)成员采用了两步方法来了解远程医疗在实现全球卫生公平方面的作用。我们首先对该主题进行了共识审查,然后进行了修改的德尔菲过程,以回答与远程医疗在发展有弹性和公平的卫生系统中可以发挥的作用有关的四个问题。结果:来自8个国家的15个工作组成员参与了德尔菲过程,分享了他们的观点。专家们一致认为,尽管在2019冠状病毒病大流行之前和期间的远程医疗服务促进了医疗保健服务的提供和获取,但他们也感到关切的是,全球远程医疗服务并非人人平等。专家组达成的共识是,包括技术、融资、获得医疗用品和设备以及治理能力在内的卫生系统概念都可能影响远程卫生服务的提供。结论:大流行期间,远程医疗在提供医疗服务方面发挥了重要作用。然而,远程保健服务也导致了意想不到的后果,包括不平等问题和数字鸿沟的扩大。因此,远程医疗从业人员、专业人员和系统设计者需要有意识地设计公平,作为实现更广泛的卫生系统目标的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Yearbook of medical informatics
Yearbook of medical informatics Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Published by the International Medical Informatics Association, this annual publication includes the best papers in medical informatics from around the world.
期刊最新文献
Reflections Towards the Future of Medical Informatics. The Impact of Clinical Decision Support on Health Disparities and the Digital Divide. Health Information Exchange: Understanding the Policy Landscape and Future of Data Interoperability. The Need for Green and Responsible Medical Informatics and Digital Health: Looking Forward with One Digital Health. Health Equity in Clinical Research Informatics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1