Impacts of cancer-associated stromal cells on growth of human gastric cancer cell lines

H. Niwa, Y. Maeyama, Shojiro Kikuchi, H. Kawaguchi, T. Daimon, Y. Furuya, Hiroshi Ito, N. Mizuno, M. Otsu, H. Yasuhara, M. Sasako
{"title":"Impacts of cancer-associated stromal cells on growth of human gastric cancer cell lines","authors":"H. Niwa, Y. Maeyama, Shojiro Kikuchi, H. Kawaguchi, T. Daimon, Y. Furuya, Hiroshi Ito, N. Mizuno, M. Otsu, H. Yasuhara, M. Sasako","doi":"10.14800/CCM.921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scirrhous gastric cancer (SGC) is highly resistant to treatment and has a poor prognosis. Tumor stromal cells are considered to play vital roles in the development of SGC. However, interactions between cancer cells and stromal cells are poorly understood. We evaluated the importance of direct contact between cancer cells and stromal cells in vitro . We obtained gastric cancer-associated stromal cells (GCSCs) and normal gastric stromal cells (GSCs) from six patients. We co-cultured these cells with MKN45 solid-type gastric cancer and HSC43 SGC cells, respectively, for 7 days. Both gastric cancer cell lines were labeled with fluorescent protein to distinguish them from stromal cells in culture. We used two co-culture models: direct contact (GCSCs and GSCs), in which cancer cells and stromal cells were mixed, and indirect contact (GCSCs only), in which cells were separated by cell culture inserts. We also compared the gene expression profiles of GCSCs and GSCs by microarray assays. The cell growth rate was significantly higher in the direct-contact GCSC model compared with that in monocultured cells in MKN45, but not in HSC43 cells. For either cell line, there was no significant difference in growth rates between indirect GCSC co-cultures and monocultures, and no difference between direct or indirect GSC co-cultures and monocultures. In terms of gene expression, fibroblast growth factor 9, which has an anti-apoptotic effect on gastric cancer cells, was more up-regulated in GCSCs than in GSCs. Flow cytometry revealed no difference between GCSCs and GSCs in terms of marker expression. In conclusion, although stromal cells can influence the growth of gastric cancer cells, our results suggest that the impacts of interactions with stromal cells might vary according to the specific characteristics of the cancer cells.","PeriodicalId":9576,"journal":{"name":"Cancer cell & microenvironment","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer cell & microenvironment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14800/CCM.921","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Scirrhous gastric cancer (SGC) is highly resistant to treatment and has a poor prognosis. Tumor stromal cells are considered to play vital roles in the development of SGC. However, interactions between cancer cells and stromal cells are poorly understood. We evaluated the importance of direct contact between cancer cells and stromal cells in vitro . We obtained gastric cancer-associated stromal cells (GCSCs) and normal gastric stromal cells (GSCs) from six patients. We co-cultured these cells with MKN45 solid-type gastric cancer and HSC43 SGC cells, respectively, for 7 days. Both gastric cancer cell lines were labeled with fluorescent protein to distinguish them from stromal cells in culture. We used two co-culture models: direct contact (GCSCs and GSCs), in which cancer cells and stromal cells were mixed, and indirect contact (GCSCs only), in which cells were separated by cell culture inserts. We also compared the gene expression profiles of GCSCs and GSCs by microarray assays. The cell growth rate was significantly higher in the direct-contact GCSC model compared with that in monocultured cells in MKN45, but not in HSC43 cells. For either cell line, there was no significant difference in growth rates between indirect GCSC co-cultures and monocultures, and no difference between direct or indirect GSC co-cultures and monocultures. In terms of gene expression, fibroblast growth factor 9, which has an anti-apoptotic effect on gastric cancer cells, was more up-regulated in GCSCs than in GSCs. Flow cytometry revealed no difference between GCSCs and GSCs in terms of marker expression. In conclusion, although stromal cells can influence the growth of gastric cancer cells, our results suggest that the impacts of interactions with stromal cells might vary according to the specific characteristics of the cancer cells.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
癌相关基质细胞对人胃癌细胞系生长的影响
顽固性胃癌(SGC)对治疗具有高度耐药性,预后较差。肿瘤间质细胞被认为在SGC的发展中起着至关重要的作用。然而,癌细胞和基质细胞之间的相互作用知之甚少。我们评估了癌细胞和基质细胞在体外直接接触的重要性。我们从6例患者中获得胃癌相关基质细胞(GCSCs)和正常胃基质细胞(GSCs)。我们将这些细胞分别与MKN45实体型胃癌细胞和HSC43 SGC细胞共培养7天。两种胃癌细胞系均用荧光蛋白标记,以区别于培养的基质细胞。我们使用了两种共培养模型:直接接触(GCSCs和GSCs),其中癌细胞和基质细胞混合在一起;间接接触(GCSCs),其中细胞通过细胞培养插入物分离。我们还通过微阵列分析比较了GCSCs和GSCs的基因表达谱。直接接触GCSC模型的细胞生长速率明显高于MKN45单培养细胞,而HSC43细胞生长速率不明显。对于两种细胞系,GCSC间接共培养与单培养之间的生长速率无显著差异,GSC直接或间接共培养与单培养之间无显著差异。基因表达方面,对胃癌细胞具有抗凋亡作用的成纤维细胞生长因子9在GCSCs中的上调幅度大于GSCs。流式细胞术显示GCSCs和GSCs在标记物表达方面没有差异。综上所述,虽然基质细胞可以影响胃癌细胞的生长,但我们的研究结果表明,基质细胞相互作用的影响可能因癌细胞的具体特征而异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Role of Monoamine oxidase A (MAO-A) in cancer progression and metastasis Cellular Homeostasis or Tumorigenesis: USP7 Playing the Double Agent Research Highlight: Metastatic Malignant Thymoma to the Abdomen Scaling up to study brca2: the zeppelin zebrafish mutant reveals a role for brca2 in embryonic development of kidney mesoderm. Cryptotanshinone suppresses cell proliferation and induces apoptosis in renal cell carcinoma as an STAT3 inhibitor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1