Factors Affecting the Accuracy of Coding Selection of Major Diagnoses on the Homepage of Medical Records

X. Ye, Li Ma, Yutao Qiu, Jipeng Yang
{"title":"Factors Affecting the Accuracy of Coding Selection of Major Diagnoses on the Homepage of Medical Records","authors":"X. Ye, Li Ma, Yutao Qiu, Jipeng Yang","doi":"10.6913/mrhk.040209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"[Objective] This study aimed to investigate current issues, root causes, and improvement measures of the main diagnostic codes on the homepage of a hospital's inpatient medical records, and to improve the accuracy of the hospital's main diagnostic codes.[Methods]A retrospective analysis was carried out on the homepage data of inpatient medical records in a hospital. After implementing the quality control of medical record coding, we compared and analyzed 1000 medical records before the intervention (March 1 to June 30, 2020) and 1000 medical records after the intervention (March 1 to June 30, 2021). The accuracy of the homepage data of the medical records was compared and the quality control efficacy after the intervention was evaluated.[Results] Following the intervention, the number of major diagnostic errors on the homepage of medical records decreased by 84% (from 38 cases per 1000 to 6 cases per 1000, p<0.05). Among them, the main diagnosis error was reduced from 6 cases to 1 case, the main diagnosis selection error was reduced from 5 cases to 2 cases, the ambiguous (QY) medical records were reduced from 19 cases to 2 cases, and the medical records with codes not merged were reduced from 9 cases to 1 case. According to the analysis of influencing factors, after the intervention measures were taken, the filling errors by physicians decreased from 17 cases to 2 cases, the errors by coders decreased from 12 cases to 2 cases, and the errors from information management decreased from 9 cases to 2 cases.[Conclusions] After the intervention, the number of errors in filling by physicians, coding by coders, and information management on the homepage of medical records decreased significantly. In addition, the accuracy of the main diagnostic codes on the homepage has been greatly improved, which helps ensure the reliability of information statistics and effectively improves the quality and safety of medical care.","PeriodicalId":50132,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Research","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6913/mrhk.040209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

[Objective] This study aimed to investigate current issues, root causes, and improvement measures of the main diagnostic codes on the homepage of a hospital's inpatient medical records, and to improve the accuracy of the hospital's main diagnostic codes.[Methods]A retrospective analysis was carried out on the homepage data of inpatient medical records in a hospital. After implementing the quality control of medical record coding, we compared and analyzed 1000 medical records before the intervention (March 1 to June 30, 2020) and 1000 medical records after the intervention (March 1 to June 30, 2021). The accuracy of the homepage data of the medical records was compared and the quality control efficacy after the intervention was evaluated.[Results] Following the intervention, the number of major diagnostic errors on the homepage of medical records decreased by 84% (from 38 cases per 1000 to 6 cases per 1000, p<0.05). Among them, the main diagnosis error was reduced from 6 cases to 1 case, the main diagnosis selection error was reduced from 5 cases to 2 cases, the ambiguous (QY) medical records were reduced from 19 cases to 2 cases, and the medical records with codes not merged were reduced from 9 cases to 1 case. According to the analysis of influencing factors, after the intervention measures were taken, the filling errors by physicians decreased from 17 cases to 2 cases, the errors by coders decreased from 12 cases to 2 cases, and the errors from information management decreased from 9 cases to 2 cases.[Conclusions] After the intervention, the number of errors in filling by physicians, coding by coders, and information management on the homepage of medical records decreased significantly. In addition, the accuracy of the main diagnostic codes on the homepage has been greatly improved, which helps ensure the reliability of information statistics and effectively improves the quality and safety of medical care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影响病案首页重大诊断编码选择准确性的因素
【目的】了解某医院住院病案首页主要诊断码存在的问题、原因及改进措施,提高医院主要诊断码的准确性。[方法]对某医院住院病案主页资料进行回顾性分析。在实施病案编码质量控制后,对干预前(2020年3月1日至6月30日)的1000份病案与干预后(2021年3月1日至6月30日)的1000份病案进行对比分析。比较病案首页数据的准确性,评价干预后的质量控制效果。[结果]干预后,病案首页重大诊断错误数量下降了84%(由38 / 1000下降到6 / 1000,p<0.05)。其中,主要诊断错误从6例减少到1例,主要诊断选择错误从5例减少到2例,模棱两可(QY)病历从19例减少到2例,未合并代码的病历从9例减少到1例。通过对影响因素的分析,采取干预措施后,医生差错从17例减少到2例,编码员差错从12例减少到2例,信息管理差错从9例减少到2例。[结论]干预后,医师填写错误、编码员编码错误、病案首页信息管理错误明显减少。此外,主页上主要诊断代码的准确性也大大提高,有助于保证信息统计的可靠性,有效提高医疗质量和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessing Influenza Vaccine Adherence Among Pregnant Women: A Health Center-Based Study in Qatar Micronodular thymic carcinoma with lymphoid hyperplasia : A case report and review of the literature Long-term Clean Intermittent Catheterization Users’ Experience and Practical Barriers: A Qualitative Systematic Review and Meta-synthesis Whether serum albumin/leukocyte ratio combined with Go-FAR score more accurately predicts the neurological outcome of patients who suffered cardiac arrest Creation of a oblique colon valve: a new methods to wake up the stem cell of colon
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1