The report of technical-scientific or medico-legal finding and its correlation with the judicial expertise report

Artiom Pilat
{"title":"The report of technical-scientific or medico-legal finding and its correlation with the judicial expertise report","authors":"Artiom Pilat","doi":"10.52388/1811-0770.2021.3(245).07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the criminal process, without the judges’ rigorous knowledge of the criminal act, actually produced, of the perpetrator’s person, of the objective circumstances that preceded, accompanied or followed the commission of the crime, of the subjective circumstances, as well as without clear knowledge of other circumstances. related to the case, the administration of justice is sometimes impossible. In order to ascertain the objective truth in the criminal cases of the factual data in the vast majority of cases it is necessary to apply special knowledge. In all the cases in which the expertise is spoken, a research carried out by the judicial expert is considered in order to clarify some questions that require special knowledge in one area or another. The most frequently asked questions are in the field of science, technique, art or craft. The law on judicial expertise and the status of the judicial expert defines judicial expertise as a scientific-practical research activity, carried out in the civil, criminal or contraventional process (hereinafter referred to as the judicial process) in order to find out the truth by carrying out methodical investigations with the application of special knowledge and technical-scientific procedures for drawing some argued conclusions about certain facts, circumstances, material objects, phenomena and processes, the human body and psyche, which can serve as evidence in a judicial process","PeriodicalId":83195,"journal":{"name":"The National law journal","volume":"65 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The National law journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52388/1811-0770.2021.3(245).07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the criminal process, without the judges’ rigorous knowledge of the criminal act, actually produced, of the perpetrator’s person, of the objective circumstances that preceded, accompanied or followed the commission of the crime, of the subjective circumstances, as well as without clear knowledge of other circumstances. related to the case, the administration of justice is sometimes impossible. In order to ascertain the objective truth in the criminal cases of the factual data in the vast majority of cases it is necessary to apply special knowledge. In all the cases in which the expertise is spoken, a research carried out by the judicial expert is considered in order to clarify some questions that require special knowledge in one area or another. The most frequently asked questions are in the field of science, technique, art or craft. The law on judicial expertise and the status of the judicial expert defines judicial expertise as a scientific-practical research activity, carried out in the civil, criminal or contraventional process (hereinafter referred to as the judicial process) in order to find out the truth by carrying out methodical investigations with the application of special knowledge and technical-scientific procedures for drawing some argued conclusions about certain facts, circumstances, material objects, phenomena and processes, the human body and psyche, which can serve as evidence in a judicial process
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
技术-科学或医学-法律调查结果的报告及其与司法鉴定报告的相关性
在刑事诉讼过程中,法官对犯罪行为的实际产生,对行为人本人,对犯罪前、伴、后的客观情况,对犯罪的主观情况,以及对其他情况的不明确认识的情况,都没有严格的认识。与案件有关,司法管理有时是不可能的。在绝大多数情况下,为了确定刑事案件的事实资料的客观真理,有必要运用专门的知识。在所有使用专门知识的案件中,都考虑到司法专家进行的研究,以便澄清需要某一领域或另一领域的专门知识的一些问题。最常见的问题是在科学、技术、艺术或工艺领域。《司法鉴定和司法鉴定人地位法》将司法鉴定定义为在民事、刑事或常规程序(以下简称司法程序)中进行的科学实践研究活动,目的是运用专门知识和技术科学程序进行有系统的调查,以查明事实真相,对某些事实、情况、实物得出一些有争议的结论。在司法程序中可以作为证据的现象和过程,人的身体和精神
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Aggravating circumstances of the crime of disclosure of state secret Strategies and tactics for resolving territorial conflicts in Georgia through the prism of international law Contesting the conclusion of the rejection of the application for lifting the exception of unconstitutionality: the attitude of the Constitutional Court Protection of honor, dignity and business reputation of citizens in international law Translation of legal language and the problem of equivalence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1