Understanding well-being outcomes in primary care arts on referral interventions: a mixed method study

Samantha Hughes, D. Crone, Rachel C. Sumner, Mark Redmond
{"title":"Understanding well-being outcomes in primary care arts on referral interventions: a mixed method study","authors":"Samantha Hughes, D. Crone, Rachel C. Sumner, Mark Redmond","doi":"10.5750/EJPCH.V7I3.1768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Arts on Prescription programmes are designed to support mental health and well-being of patients with a variety of clinical needs within the community. Despite a number of studies reporting benefits, there are some patients that do not see improvements in well-being. Yet, there is limited research investigating the reasons for this. Methods: Using a sequential mixed-methods design the present study sought to understand why some participants (N=312) experienced an increase in well-being and others did not (N=95) after attending an Arts on Prescription intervention based in the South West of England between 2009 and 2016. Results: Quantitative comparisons between the two groups identified little differences, aside from age and baseline well-being (WEMWBS scores), with those that improved being slightly younger, and having lower well-being at the outset compared with those that did not improve. A process model depicting the perceived facilitative and inhibitive factors of attending the programme was developed from the qualitative findings. This model suggests that the social aspect of the course may be implicated in the participants differential outcomes; with those that showed a decrease in well-being reporting difficulties in interacting with others during the intervention. Further, the participants who reported an increase in well-being felt vulnerable to “relapse” when finishing the course due to uncertainties regarding future support and at their ability to maintain their well-being without the provision of the programme. Conclusions: This research suggests a need to promote communication amongst groups in such interventions with the hope that this will provide a more facilitative environment for all participants to benefit. Also, such programmes should consider follow-on options to ensure the participants feel supported and confident in managing their well-being once the course comes to an end. Findings will be pertinent to those commissioning primary care art interventions, ensuring that referral policies and pathways are designed for optimal effectiveness and for potentially tailoring social prescribing programmes to suit the participants specific needs.","PeriodicalId":72966,"journal":{"name":"European journal for person centered healthcare","volume":"2 1","pages":"530-539"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal for person centered healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5750/EJPCH.V7I3.1768","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Arts on Prescription programmes are designed to support mental health and well-being of patients with a variety of clinical needs within the community. Despite a number of studies reporting benefits, there are some patients that do not see improvements in well-being. Yet, there is limited research investigating the reasons for this. Methods: Using a sequential mixed-methods design the present study sought to understand why some participants (N=312) experienced an increase in well-being and others did not (N=95) after attending an Arts on Prescription intervention based in the South West of England between 2009 and 2016. Results: Quantitative comparisons between the two groups identified little differences, aside from age and baseline well-being (WEMWBS scores), with those that improved being slightly younger, and having lower well-being at the outset compared with those that did not improve. A process model depicting the perceived facilitative and inhibitive factors of attending the programme was developed from the qualitative findings. This model suggests that the social aspect of the course may be implicated in the participants differential outcomes; with those that showed a decrease in well-being reporting difficulties in interacting with others during the intervention. Further, the participants who reported an increase in well-being felt vulnerable to “relapse” when finishing the course due to uncertainties regarding future support and at their ability to maintain their well-being without the provision of the programme. Conclusions: This research suggests a need to promote communication amongst groups in such interventions with the hope that this will provide a more facilitative environment for all participants to benefit. Also, such programmes should consider follow-on options to ensure the participants feel supported and confident in managing their well-being once the course comes to an end. Findings will be pertinent to those commissioning primary care art interventions, ensuring that referral policies and pathways are designed for optimal effectiveness and for potentially tailoring social prescribing programmes to suit the participants specific needs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解初级保健艺术对转诊干预的健康结果:一项混合方法研究
背景:处方艺术方案旨在支持社区内具有各种临床需求的患者的心理健康和福祉。尽管有许多研究报告了益处,但仍有一些患者没有看到幸福感的改善。然而,调查其原因的研究有限。方法:本研究采用顺序混合方法设计,试图理解为什么2009年至2016年期间在英格兰西南部参加处方艺术干预后,一些参与者(N=312)经历了幸福感的增加,而另一些参与者(N=95)没有。结果:两组之间的定量比较发现,除了年龄和基线幸福感(WEMWBS评分)之外,差异很小,与那些没有改善的人相比,改善的人更年轻,一开始的幸福感更低。一个过程模型描述了参与该方案的可感知的促进和抑制因素,该模型是根据定性研究结果开发的。该模型表明,课程的社会方面可能涉及到参与者的差异结果;那些表现出幸福感下降的人在干预期间报告与他人互动困难。此外,报告幸福感增加的参与者在完成课程时感到容易“复发”,因为不确定未来的支持和他们在没有提供方案的情况下保持幸福感的能力。结论:这项研究表明,在这种干预措施中,有必要促进群体之间的沟通,希望这将为所有参与者提供一个更便利的环境。此外,这些方案应考虑后续选择,以确保学员在课程结束后感到得到支持和有信心管理自己的福祉。研究结果将与那些委托初级保健艺术干预措施有关,确保转诊政策和途径的设计具有最佳效果,并可能根据参与者的具体需求量身定制社会处方方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The ethical and epistemic roles of narrative in person-centred healthcare Person-Centred Healthcare versus Patient Centricity - what is the difference and how are pharmaceutical companies aiming to secure internal representation of the patient voice? Moving past phronesis: clinical reasoning in person-centered care Persons over models: shared decision-making for person-centered medicine lifestyle and degeneracy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1